Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Was There 3 Explosions At The WTC  
User currently offlinePlanespotterx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1442 times:

take a look at this site: http://www.100777.com/node/view/243 Im sorry but i dont remember seeing anything other than the WTC's on fire before i saw the website, was there really 3 explosions, or is it a fake..

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 5977 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1417 times:

To me it looks like a dust cloud, caused by the collapse of one of the towers.

User currently offlineINNflight From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3765 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

I'm with CPH-R on this point... Maybe the smoke came from some lower floors or from the main entrace?  Insane

Also, shouldn't it be "WERE there 3 Explosions At the WTC"?  Smile  Insane


regards, Florian




Jet Visuals
User currently offlinePlanespotterx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1410 times:

yeah I was thinking the same thing, but in the text the website mentions the "3rd explosion" was a few minutes before the tower collapsed...I think you could be right about it being a dust-cloud, but if it was before the tower collapsed i cant explain it...

User currently offlineTWISTEDWHISPER From Sweden, joined Aug 2003, 711 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1379 times:

There was indeed three explosions... the first one occured a few years before 9/11 -2001  Big thumbs up




Read between the lines.
User currently offlineDamirc From Slovenia, joined Feb 2004, 723 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1374 times:

It's a dust cloud just after the first tower collapsed (you will see that only the north tower is still standing in this animation).

D.


User currently offlineKBOS From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 429 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1356 times:

Well, there was a lot of flaming wreckage strewn about the entire area which could easily touch off other fires....of course, there will be folks who claim it was a CIA plot, it was caused by missiles or it was an aborted Alien invasion..I don't know....I'll have to discuss it with Elvis when he comes over for dinner....


I don't care if the sun don't shine, I do my drinkin in the evening time when I'm in Rhode Island
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1347 times:

It's all a conspiracy!
The CIA exploded the towers, everyone knows they were designed so an aircraft could never take them down so it has to have been the CIA...

[sarcasm mode off]



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineVSLover From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1897 posts, RR: 22
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1341 times:

1) in the clip, BOTH towers are still standing, nothing yet has collapsed
2) i believe it to be a hoax.

i only say that because between the time the last tower were hit and the first began to fall, i was out on the street near where this third supposed explosion took place. i dont recall any big explosive cloud other than when the south tower began to fall, at which point i began to run for my life.


User currently offlineAvi From Israel, joined Sep 2001, 939 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1302 times:

Both towers are still standing so this is not a dust from a collapse.
However, don’t forget that the second plane hit the tower in the corner and parts of it passed through it and crashed on the ground and other buildings. The 2 towers were not the only building on fire that day (another 2 or 3 building collapsed too). It is possible that it is a smoke from another small building that is on fire.



Long live the B747
User currently offlineB2707SST From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 1369 posts, RR: 59
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1293 times:

It looks to me like the South Tower had just finished collapsing in the video - look at the smoke plume behind the North Tower. From video of the South Tower collapse, some of the dust plume initially climbed up higher than the rest, probably after hitting a nearby building (maybe the World Financial Center) and being forced upward:



A few seconds later, the rest of the debris cloud began to expand.

--B2707SST



Keynes is dead and we are living in his long run.
User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1215 times:

Planespotterx:

There are at least five fairly obvious reasons why this footage should be treated as suspect:

(i) Look at the smoke/dust cloud behind the buildings. It runs all the way from the top of the WTC to the base. This only occurred AFTER the collapse of the first tower. Before then the smoke was confined only to the upper section of the buildings, as seen here:




(ii) Look at the top of the towers. Can you see that vertical protrustion between them, in the smoke? At first glance it looks like the antenna on the north tower. But it doesn't appear to be in the correct position (namely the centre of the roof). I believe that it's not the antenna but a clumsy dividing line - evidence that one of the towers in the footage has been doctored in afterwards.

(iii) If the two towers in the footage are supposed to be the north and south tower, how come the black patches on the building face appear to be at the same level, when the towers were clearly hit at different levels?

(iv) And while we're on that subject - look at the way the smoke billows from the top of the buildings. Doesn't it appear just a little too symmetrical, especially given that the towers were hit at different heights?

(v) Most damning of all - this site looks like a crackpot conspiracy exercise. Funny how it's always those folks who see these blatantly-obvious things that millions of others miss...


In short, I believe what you're seeing is a doctored version of the footage taken as the south tower collapsed (note the way the camera draws back) - which explains your "third" explosion - simply a dust-cloud thrown up from the debris at street-level.

Someone has added the other tower - possibly a mirror image - afterwards.

The prosecution rests, m'lord.


User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1172 times:

These poeple have waaaaaaaaaay to much time on there hands.

User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1152 times:

Oh man. I really don't like those pictures. They really bring back bad memories of a really sad day..

User currently offlineUnattendedbag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2323 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1122 times:

There was indeed three explosions... the first one occured a few years before 9/11 -2001

try 2003



Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineUnattendedbag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2323 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1083 times:

try 2003

my mistake, my mistake, try 1993

how embarassing, my bad

sorry



Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineDc10guy From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 2685 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1067 times:

People still think TWA 800 was shot down too,,,, But it wasn't.


Next time try the old "dirty Sanchez" She'll love it !!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is There A Terrorist At The Airport? posted Fri Oct 28 2005 22:09:40 by Airlinelover
Was There Warning Of The Tsunami? posted Fri Dec 31 2004 00:06:29 by Ual747
Good Vs Evil...The Devil Sighted At The WTC Crash posted Thu Sep 13 2001 11:45:51 by L-188
Gettin' A Thumpin At The Rodeo posted Wed Nov 8 2006 20:08:32 by Flyf15
Headaches At The Polls-voting Machines Screw Up posted Tue Nov 7 2006 21:53:52 by 727LOVER
Boring Day At The Music Store posted Sat Oct 28 2006 04:24:29 by AsstChiefMark
Anyone At The Mac Expo 28/10/06 In London? posted Sun Oct 15 2006 02:50:03 by Jkw777
What Programs Are You Really Into At The Minute? posted Wed Oct 11 2006 22:19:04 by Jamesbuk
PRG Meet At The Short Finale, Aka Part IV posted Thu Aug 24 2006 14:35:24 by Zruda
Trip Report: Lazy Sunday At The Gliding Club (pix) posted Mon Jul 17 2006 23:08:02 by Birdwatching