AWspicious From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1001 times:
Maybe they weren't typos... really. Perhaps, some printers having fun... The same printers from Psalm 119:161. Then again, it could have been an english language translation issue.
But, I wonder... Because, after all, women do adorn themselves in modern apparel
Gc From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2003, 356 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 996 times:
" The source of these typos is unknown" (from the linked article)
Anywhoo you've found the reason that Christians often have several different translations, concordonces and commentaries to cross reference and check accuracy. Also for the very important reason that some of us are actually intelligent enough to realise that the English version wasn't the first so we need to look at the cultural, spiritual and grammatical contexts.
Having a conversation with God while you're reading it helps too, you should try it, you'll probably surprise yourself!
ConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 989 times:
C-Boy, don't say that too loud around here.
Some of your countrymen might start a flame war.
Nah. I'm about as hard-core Southern Baptist as a mix-raced fag can be.......... but even I realize and can admit that there are tons of inaccuracies from version to version of the bible. Like King James' blatant omissions.
Horus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 59
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 965 times:
Can someone here explain to me the difference between the varying 'versions' of the Bible. I mean obviously they all convey the same message but why are there differences in the text? Like would the bible of a Coptic Orthodox differ from that of a Protestant?