Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Should U.S. 'give' Saddam To New Iraqii Govmt?  
User currently offlineCptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3220 posts, RR: 12
Posted (10 years 3 months 5 days ago) and read 1079 times:

Just heard on TV (a CNN? pole) that over forty percent of U.S. citizens polled think that the U.S. government should NOT turn over Saddam to the new Iraqi government at the end of the month for trial.

I'm sure this topic will be prominent at a family gathering on the wife's side this coming weekend and thought I'd ask for opinions from our international A.net forum community. Reasons pro and con will surely be presented, but I'm more interested in a 'yes' or 'no' percentage in reference to how all of you feel. Thanks, and regards....Jack


all best; jack
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 5 days ago) and read 1075 times:

The crimes he committed were (for the most part) against the Iraqi people. If the US kept him, he could only be tried for crimes committed against US citizens (I presume). The choice is obvious.

User currently offlineCaptoveur From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 5 days ago) and read 1071 times:

Maybe we could trade him for oil or something.

Not like he is going to get much of a trial, this is all just to determine who gets to decide if he gets life imprisonment or death.


User currently offlineMt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6593 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1059 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

They should. It would validate the new "independent" iraq.


Step into my office, baby
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29799 posts, RR: 58
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1050 times:

Well, whatever happens to him, it needs to happen to him in an Iraqi court.

Maybe we could promise to guard him, while they judge him.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineJamesag96 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 2095 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1049 times:

Give him to the Iraqis. They suffered under him...they can handle him.


Why Kate, You're not wearing a bustle. How lewd.
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29799 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1045 times:

I just don't trust the people that would guard him.


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineJarek From Poland, joined May 2001, 347 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1032 times:

I don't think they have an option. AFAIK according to the international law they have to give him to Iraqi on June 30th.

Regards
JArek


User currently offlineCptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3220 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1021 times:

Thanks for the replies; all UNDERWHELMING total of you. Hmmmm....evidently most people here are more intersested in bashing/supporting their favorite love/hate politics instead of a simple answer.

Thanks, again, JGH1A, Captoveur,Mr99, Jamesag96, L188 (I had a li'l right-seat time in Electras back in the 1970s , Mr.L  Smile ) and Jarek. Y'all take care and I appreciate the replies...Jack



all best; jack
User currently offlineAcidradio From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1874 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 999 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

They need to make a sitcom with Saddam starring in it. It would be kind of like Dennis the Menace and Saddam would play a role similar to Mr. Wilson, with some annoying kid next door constantly harassing him and making it difficult to run his dictatorship.


Ich haben zwei Platzspielen und ein Microphone
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 998 times:

Iraq Without Me - The Real Hussein II
A Wartime Parody to the Tune of Eminem's "Without Me".

Great stuff : http://www.frontsteps.com/creations/1001/89/index.php?t=1087726393

I say give him back. The only reason to put someone on trial in an international court is if the home country does not have an effective judicial system, and if America wants to show the world that Iraq now has an independant, legitimate, and soveriegn government, they have to let Saddam be tried in his own country.

Charles


User currently offlineMidnightMike From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2892 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 987 times:


We have to turn Saddam over to the New Govmt of Iraq, it is what we said we would do from the very beginning.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineGalaxy5 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2034 posts, RR: 24
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 981 times:

Wouldnt it be the end all, if we give the Iraqi people Saddam to have for trial, then they release him and he regains his power, Say they "elect" him some how. Then saddam orders the US troops out of the region.

As improbable as this sounds, could you imagine if something like that happened.



"damn, I didnt know prince could Ball like that" - Charlie Murphy
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16866 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 969 times:

I might be the only one who feels this way but I think Saddam should be turned over to the Hague and have a open trial where the World could hear the true depth of the tyranny and pain Saddam caused the people of Iraq (and Iran).

I don't think the World really has a clue to the crimes he committed, and Im afraid that the Iraqi's would just lynch him real quick without any trial, not that Im worried about Saddam getting fair treatment but I think the truth about what he did needs to come out and he needs to answer questions.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 967 times:

Maybe we could trade him for oil or something.

I hope that was just a joke...

I agree with an earlier statement. If Saddam is given back to the Iraqis and not immediatly executed, its just a matter of time before he rises to power. It happened before, why couldn't it happen again? Especially when many people in Iraq are expressing the feeling that things were bad under Saddam, but are worse now that he's gone.

Who in the country has the power to return relative peace and order but someone who is ruthless? The US is losing control even with the enormous military capability and ruthless actions.

I might be the only one who feels this way but I think Saddam should be turned over to the Hague and have a open trial where the World could hear the true depth of the tyranny and pain Saddam caused the people of Iraq (and Iran).


The US has pretty much turned its back on the World Court. Much like it has turned its back on the UN in this matter. Why should the World Court now adopt the mess the US has made? There is a chance that Saddam would be exhonorated on a technicality or be released on lack of evidence.

The whole issue is pretty much a moot point anyway, as even if the Iraqis elevated Saddam to power, he will be little if no threat to the US. As little as he ever was.



User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 962 times:

Maybe we could trade him for oil or something.

Boy, there's a great idea. The man committed crimes against the Iraqi people, by the U.S. shouldn't give him up unless Iraq gives US something.

I will take that as a joke, unless told otherwise. He's an Iraqi, he lives in Iraq. His crimes were against the country of Iraq. Give him up. If you don't this talk of Iraq being more free is a sham.

I just don't trust the people that would guard him.

Life just sucks, L-188. Let Iraq handle him.

And what do we do if Iraq lets him walk, or seek asylum, or finds him "not guilty"? Does the U.S. interfere, and take him back? We'll see how "autonomous" Iraq will be in such a situation.

Wouldnt it be the end all, if we give the Iraqi people Saddam to have for trial, then they release him and he regains his power, Say they "elect" him some how. Then saddam orders the US troops out of the region.

As improbable as this sounds, could you imagine if something like that happened?


There was a poll out on one of the networks the other day-prolly CNN, that said 35% of Iraqi's want Saddam back in power, so, while far-fetched, I think such a scenario is possible, under the right circumstances.


User currently offlineSchoenorama From Spain, joined Apr 2001, 2440 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 965 times:

STT757:

I might be the only one who feels this way but I think Saddam should be turned over to the Hague and have a open trial where the World could hear the true depth of the tyranny and pain Saddam caused the people of Iraq (and Iran).

I agree with you that he should be turned over to an international recognized tribunal. There’s only one such Tribunal and that’s the International Criminal Court in The Hague (the Netherlands). The ICC can only act in case Saddam is not put on trial in Iraq (for whatever reason). Given Bush’s latests statements on the handover of Saddam to the Iraqi people, some concern about Saddam being put on trial in Iraq at all are not too far fetched.

I don't think the World really has a clue to the crimes he committed, and Im afraid that the Iraqi's would just lynch him real quick without any trial,...

I don’t agree with you on that one. There’s also another group of people that would like to see Saddam dead asap, although they never say so. If Saddam were to be put up in trial in, let’s say, The Hague, he might just start telling everyone which countries supported his attack on Iran, where he got his military intelligence from on Iranian military positions, which countries provided him with biological weapons, which multinational oil companies tried to buy his oil after he gassed the Kurds, etc., etc.

The fact that the US, under this administration, is not a signatory of the ICC, does not mean Saddam can’t be put on trial there. Iraq might decide to sign up, eventually. In this regard, it might be interesting to know that while all military operations in Iraq are normally labelled as ‘Coalition Operations’, Saddam is in American Custody, probably because other ‘Coalition Members’ are signatories of the ICC. If Saddam would have been in the custody of ‘Coalition Forces’, the US would have had a hard time in avoiding Saddam be put on trial at the ICC, IMHO.



Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Saddam To Give A Historic Speech posted Mon Mar 24 2003 08:30:03 by United777
Study: Major Repairs Needed To New Cars posted Sat Jan 27 2007 06:07:35 by Jutes85
Angelina Jolie And Brad Pitt Move To New Orleans posted Wed Jan 17 2007 13:31:17 by MSYtristar
Dutch Give Medal To Srebrenica Troops posted Fri Dec 8 2006 03:25:13 by 777236ER
Westboro Baptist Stoops To A New Low posted Thu Nov 23 2006 00:48:39 by BHMBAGLOCK
Give Us Back New York posted Mon Nov 20 2006 19:10:47 by BR076
Cat Give Birth To Puppies posted Fri Nov 17 2006 16:19:36 by BR076
Saddam To Be Hanged In India (sort Of...) posted Fri Nov 10 2006 10:32:00 by Thom@s
2nd Cruise Ship Returns To New Orleans posted Fri Oct 27 2006 14:54:45 by MSYtristar
Campaign Scare Tactics Stoop To A New Low posted Mon Oct 23 2006 04:15:15 by Cba