Banco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 970 times:
I think you got to the guts of it there, Mark.
Um. Why is this news? It isn't like he's ever going to win the thing is it? He's a decent player, but not the best, nor will he ever be. Don't slag him off for not being what he isn't, praise him for what he is, the only decent player from these shores in half a century (THAT is another issue).
She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
Mikedlayer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 399 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 945 times:
It was completly Henman's fault that loss. Ancic played well right from the first serve...and Henman spent more time watching the ball rather than actually moving his ass to try and return the volley!!
Oh well, there's always next time (hmm, where have we heard that before?? lol)
Worldoftui From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 935 times:
So he didn't win. Ancic was a better player.No shame in losing to a superior opponent. Like Banco said, he has played well. Just think, 10 years ago all we had was Bates. At least he has gotten somewhere. Hopefully this is the srat of things to come. Alas, I dont think Henman will improve from now on. He may have missed his chance now.