Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bush Allies Illegally Helping Nader In Orgeon  
User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4125 posts, RR: 8
Posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1236 times:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) said phone banks encouraging Bush supporters to attend a Nader nominating convention last Saturday amounted to an illegal in-kind contribution to the Nader campaign by the Oregon Family Council and Oregon Citizens for a Sound Economy.

Bush's re-election campaign and the Oregon Republican Party were also named in the complaint for allegedly participating in the effort. The complaint alleges the groups worked together to promote Nader and siphon potential votes away from Sen. John Kerry, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.


I wonder what Republicans have to say about that? If they are so sure of victory, why all this?


"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePPGMD From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2453 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1206 times:

Every little bit helps.

Nader can do to the Democrats, what Perot did to the Republicans in 1992. If I was handed a Nader petition, I would gladly sign it, signing it just means that I want him on the ballot not that contract that I have to vote for him. Your kidding yourself if you think that Democrats would do any differently if there was a viable 3rd party conservative candidate.

I do think that they went about it in the wrong way, they did it in a way that is possibly illegal.



At worst, you screw up and die.
User currently offlineN6376m From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1198 times:

I'm a big GOP supporter and I've given $100 to Ralph. Run Ralph Run.

Funny but you didn't hear these complaints from the left when Ross was trying to get on the ballot.


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13602 posts, RR: 61
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1185 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

You also didn't hear these complaints from the left when Pat Buchanan ran as an independent, thinking his votes would come from potential Bush supporters.

Can't have it both ways, folks. Why is what was fair four years ago an underhanded tactic today?  Insane



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16259 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1148 times:

Why is this illegal? Here in Canada, we have 4 major political parties, and they often play one off against the other.

The problem with the US is that it is effectively a 2-party dictatorship each with about 50%. A strong third party would increase democracy in the US.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8507 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1140 times:

I agree with Yyz717, if this truly is illegal in the US, it shouldn't be.

More illegality from our Nanny State.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29799 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1139 times:

The fact that this is happening in Oregon, doesn't surprise me in the least.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1132 times:

I agree this is a redicilous aqusition.
Specially when the Democrats did exactly the same thing.
But is exactly the same thing here in Denmark. There are only 2 candidates for the Prime minister post. And that irritates me alot. Especially if you don't like any of them.


User currently offlineMxCtrlr From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 2485 posts, RR: 35
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1119 times:

The reason (and there are far more than just this simple one) that an Independent Party Candidate has not succeeded yet is because they are always the "fringe" politicians. Previously, the George Wallace, Ross Perot, Pat Buchannan and Ralph Nader types are the ones we normally get for Independent Party candidates. If we had someone more mainstream, the Democrats & Republicans would be in trouble.

Also, consider the political ramifications if the White House were run by someone not controlled by either main political party!  Big thumbs up

MxCtrlr  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Freight Dogs Anonymous - O.O.T.S.K.  Smokin cool



DAMN! This SUCKS! I just had to go to the next higher age bracket in my profile! :-(
User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4503 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1112 times:

You know what I find fucking disgusting is president Bush's use of the CHURCH to garner support. Bush-biased voter registration, bush parties, soliticiting church membership lists for campaign use.....all having the effect of making this election a religious issue while risking the tax-exempt status of said churches. The IRS, i understand, is looking into it and likely to give a wrist-slap to the bush campaign, but the same shit will keep going on.


THAT, is the mark of a desperate campaign, they'll do any goddamn thing to win. That man by claming religious superiority and saying it's his god-given right to be re-elected is the most despicable and unworthy presidential scumbag since Richard Nixon. The doesn't DESERVE to win, he deserves a swift kick in the ass. Or at the very lease, a rebuke from the POPE.


User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4503 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1108 times:

I'm a big GOP supporter and I've given $100 to Ralph. Run Ralph Run.


Why?? I don't understand how you can support these people? Perhaps this radical right extremism somehow appealing to you, or the reversal of pollution controls, or how about the country's deficit which, you probably aren't concerned with; how about such things as the patriot act pushed through congress right in the wake of 9/11 when such legislation would never pass today which is being abused to trample on our civil liberties, etc.



How, I ask you, can you possibly support these people?

[Edited 2004-07-02 10:32:59]

User currently offlineVectorVictor From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1087 times:

...soliticiting church membership lists for campaign use.....all having the effect of making this election a religious issue

Did you know that many predominantly African American religious congregations often invite those seeking public office to address their services? Are you aware that almost never is the invitation extended to the republican candidate or to a non-African American who's running against an African American for the same office from the same party?

Democrats have been "Sunday Solicitors" for decades. Where are your complaints about the tax status of these churches?


User currently offlineNancy From United States of America, joined May 2004, 467 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1066 times:

*Can't have it both ways, folks. Why is what was fair four years ago an underhanded tactic today?


When did the Democrats use illegal soft money contributions to support Buchanan or Perot? Maybe they did, but I'm not aware of it.



*Why is this illegal? Here in Canada, we have 4 major political parties, and they often play one off against the other.


It is illegal if they violated OR's campaign funding laws. There are legal ways to fund a campaign. This may not have been one of them. It's pretty clear in the article. If they didn't do it, then it's fine. Encouraging people to attend to political event legal, using illegal sources funding for publicity is.


User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4503 posts, RR: 15
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1044 times:

Did you know that many predominantly African American religious congregations often invite those seeking public office to address their services?


BIG difference there. These candidates were invited to ADDRESS SERVICES. However, I don't see them actively soliciting church membership lists, I don't see them asking bishops to preach in favour of them in churches across the nation, and I CERTAINLY do not see them asking the POPE for political intervention.


So, partner, I believe there's a difference. What Bush is doing is just sick. If he had just been invited to speak at a few churches...by the people of those churches, with no other religious intervention, fine. The church solicited him.

But it's the other way around now. Bush is trying to infiltrate the churches himself...forcing them to turn over their membership lists...to "be a good christian". He's trying to make it look "unfaithful" for those of a religious nature to vote for John Kerry. THAT is despicable. There is a big difference here and Bush has crossed the line and a nice healthy rebuke from the Pope oughtta nip this shit in the bud right now and expose yet another desperate disgusting measure by this waste of a president. As I hear, the pope wasn't all rosy about Bush. I'd LOVE a rebuke for Bush trying to make FAITH ITSELF a campaign issue by guilt-tripping believers out of voting for Kerry because Bush is "god's choice".

Yeah, some god's choice. Sure has a sense of humor.

[Edited 2004-07-02 20:15:23]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Beckham Given A Helping Hand In Denmark posted Wed Jan 12 2005 19:31:27 by SAS-A321
Bush Recieves The Most Votes In US History posted Wed Nov 3 2004 15:41:09 by Techrep
No Nader In Pennsylvania posted Thu Oct 14 2004 05:18:22 by N670UW
Bush To Delay Major Assaults In Iraq posted Mon Oct 11 2004 06:14:46 by Rsmith6621a
Bush Wrongly Quotes Liberal Media In NY posted Sun Sep 5 2004 16:17:08 by Dtwclipper
Bush Adviser Quits After Appearing In Swiftboat Ad posted Sun Aug 22 2004 08:09:27 by Diamond
Bush And Kerry Tied: Nader Would Effect Outcome. posted Fri Mar 5 2004 00:57:56 by North County
Bush's Immigration Bill Is Dead In The Water! posted Sat Feb 7 2004 01:22:06 by North County
Chasing Bush, Webpage To Defy Security In London posted Thu Nov 20 2003 09:43:15 by Zak
What Does Pres. Bush & 2 HP Pilots Have In Common? posted Tue Jul 2 2002 21:05:31 by Bobcat