Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
John Kerry "Too Busy" For Terrorism Briefing  
User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 23
Posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1470 times:

CNN LARRY KING LIVE
Interview With John Kerry, Teresa Heinz Kerry
Aired July 8, 2004 - 21:00 ET


KING: Tonight -- exclusive: Senator John Kerry and Teresa Heinz Kerry, their first interview event since he named John Edwards his vice presidential pick. Why do you think they'll win and should win the White House? And their reaction to this morning's terror warning, and more.
John Kerry, Teresa Heinz Kerry next, together for the hour on LARRY KING LIVE.

Good evening. Welcome to a special edition of LARRY KING LIVE here in New York with Senator John Kerry, who's frequently appeared on this show, and Teresa Heinz Kerry, her first appearance on this show. We thank you both very much for coming.

Let's get to, first thing's first, news of the day. Tom Ridge warned today about al Qaeda plans of a large-scale attack on the United States, didn't increase the -- do you see any politics in this? What's your reaction?

KERRY: Well, I haven't been briefed yet, Larry. They have offered to brief me; I just haven't had time. But all Americans are united in our efforts to defeat terrorism.

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0407/08/lkl.00.html

Now, that wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't for what Tom Daschle was saying about the information presented in this terrorism briefing.

Daschle concerned about 'sobering' terror briefing
BY DONNA SMITH, Black Hills Pioneer July 09, 2004

SPEARFISH -- Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said Thursday that he was very concerned about homeland security issues in the face of what he called the most sobering terror report he had heard recently....

Asked if the timing of the terror concerns might be aimed at stealing political thunder from the announcement of John Edwards as the democratic vice presidential candidate, Daschle replied, "The report is so sobering and so serious that I cannot bring myself to believe anyone in this administration would use this for political purposes."

Daschle said the most recent terror briefing was the second this week and contained information that there is a higher threat than there has been at any time since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?BRD=1300&dept_id=156927&newsid=12283083&PAG=461&rfi=9


"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

Can we stopped with the war on terror and it should need to make rest in the peace for right now. It was over of 3 years in September 2004.

User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1454 times:

Breaking news! Bush COMPLETELY overlooks August 6th memo....


I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1452 times:

Vafi88, have you even read the aug 8th memo?

It was about as much of a warning of a terror attack as a high school current events report.

All background, absolutely no substance and positively nothing actionable.

but of course you never hear the left wing media point that out.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1447 times:

but of course you never hear the left wing media point that out.


Of course not...

Here's a tip, get to know me before making something that stupid. I watch Fox news just as much as I watch CNN...

But you're not going to read that... that's not in your agenda, is it?



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineRussophile From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1445 times:

All background, absolutely no substance and positively nothing actionable.

Are we talking about a 'threat' of terrorism in 2001? Or the reasoning GWB provided for invading Iraq? Just curious.


User currently offlineVS340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1440 times:

Vafi88, have you even read the aug 8th memo?

It was about as much of a warning of a terror attack as a high school current events report.

All background, absolutely no substance and positively nothing actionable



Of course now that we know it was nothing really important AFTER the fact it is totally excusable that Bush ignored it in the first place



User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1439 times:

Good for bringing that up,

The Aug 8th memo is the one that liberals hold up as a clear warning that 9/11 was going to happen.

Totally unrelated to Iraq.

The report issued today by the Senate is critical of the CIA in both Iraqi and 9/11 intel. So the reference is relevent to a point.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1436 times:

I have heard testimony on the August 6th memo by not only the committe (9/11) members, but by Condi Rice... She said it didn't have anything other than that Al Qaida members wanted to strike within America by Hijacking a or some commercial aircraft and possibly targeting government buildings...

Wow... that's pretty much enough stuff to take some action... like maybe locking the cockpit doors...



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1433 times:

Vafi88, cockpit doors where reqired to be locked prior to 9/11, that has been FAA reg for years.

Like I said, the report basicly stated that Quackers where floating multiple ideas around.

There was no indication that any security changes needed to be made.


The only thing the 9/11 attack did was change Binnie, from a law enforcement to a military problem.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineBoeing4ever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1427 times:

Who's to blame for 9/11. Wow...that's a tough question...NOT!

Is it Bush who ignored a general memo that stated what everybody knew in the back of their minds? NO.

Was it Clinton who let Bin Laden go, but was reasonably sure that OBL wasn't sophisticated enough to launch a massive attack and that another administration would eventually get him? Or that since the US has felt the hand of Muslim extremism before but he was in no politically correct position to flex military power in a world that basically had its head in the sand? Well, was it his fault? NO.

It was EVERYONE'S fault. YES, it was! Yours, mine, everyones'! Yes, Al Qaida did the deed, but the WHOLE world had its head in the sand. Everyone from Saudi Arabia, to the EU, to the US. No one took the threat of terrorism seriously even after the '93 WTC bombings. Not Clinton, not Bush, not the FBI, CIA, the FAA, or any of us. Just what were we focused on before that tragic September Tuesday?

Well, if I may borrow Scotty's time machine, I'll take you back to September 10th. What was America focused on? Gary Condit and Chandra Leavy, Shark Attacks, reality TV, and other stupid pop culture bullshit. Boy, did we take our safety for granted.

It's easy now for all the mooks on this site to blame Clinton or Bush for 9/11/01...be it for the Sudan affair, to the inane August 6th memo. What could either of those two do exactly before 9/11? Launch strikes? Clinton did that...they had no effect, and the bloody Europeans went on a "US is an imperialistic aggressor!" rant. Imagine Dubya doing the same!

So, once again, leave it to an independent to get the facts straight. All the partisans should get their heads out of their asses and quit politicizing this tragic event! What happened to the unity our country experienced!? Well, it was pissed away by the partisans...shame on them!

So seriously, get off all of your high horses, because it's nothing more than a "Coulda, woulda, shoulda" affair. Did any of YOU predict the attacks? Cuz if you did, then you should be in jail for not notifying anyone!  Insane

Hindsight is 20/20.

B4e-Forever New Frontiers

[Edited 2004-07-10 07:57:48]

User currently offlineAn-225 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 3950 posts, RR: 40
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

I am surprised that 757300 has nothing better to do than just post every time someone from Democratic party takes a breath or farts. Seriously, man... it's getting ridiculous.

Alex.



Money does not bring you happiness. But it's better to cry in your own private limo than on a cold bus stop.
User currently offlineKDALAggie From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 66 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1407 times:

We American's must admit that something similar has happened before. Not in the meaning of terrorists attacks, but something close to it...

For those history buffs, please help or correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember somewhere during the annual Pear Harbor celebration times that it was said that the United States government put on an exhibition on an attack on Pearl Harbor in the late 1930's (please help with the correct year!) with the Japanese representatives in attendance. Didn't we even have Admiral Yamamoto attend school in the United States as well? Still, there were court martials and blame placed on many people after the fact.

In some ways we are all right and all wrong. I for one am still happy that we as Americans still are optimistic and loving society to not think about the tragedies that happened, but maybe that makes us naive as well.....is there really one right anwser?

Just my two cents.....



Gig'em Ags!!!!
User currently offlineSchoenorama From Spain, joined Apr 2001, 2440 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

Boeing4ever:

"...WHOLE world had its head in the sand. Everyone from Saudi Arabia, to the EU, to the US. No one took the threat of terrorism seriously even after the '93 WTC bombings."


That's simply not true. Loads of foreign (non-US) intelligence agencies, including the French, German and British, had multiple indications from different sources in the years before 9/11, that a major attack (by air) was going to take place within the US. "In 1999, British intelligence gave a secret report to the US embassy. The report stated that al-Qaeda had plans to use "commercial aircraft" in "unconventional ways", "possibly as flying bombs."
In June 2001, German intelligence warned the US, Britain, and Israel that Middle Eastern terrorists were planning to hijack commercial aircraft and use them as weapons to attack "American and Israeli symbols which stand out."

In late July 2001, Egyptian intelligence received a report from an undercover agent in Afghanistan that "20 al-Qaeda members had slipped into the US and four of them had received flight training on Cessnas." To the Egyptians, pilots of small planes didn't sound terribly alarming, but they passed on the message to the CIA anyway, fully expecting Washington to request information. "The request never came." (Source: http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/essaytheytriedtowarnus.html or a simple Google search)

If any foreign intelligence can be accused of sticking its head in the sand, than that is certainly the case of the Israeli. The numerous reports indicating the Israeli were tracking the 9/11 hijackers before the attacks took place, are alarming. See http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=271607, or http://abcnews.go.com/sections/2020/DailyNews/2020_whitevan_020621.html, among many others.


"What could either of those two do exactly before 9/11? Launch strikes? Clinton did that...they had no effect, and the bloody Europeans went on a "US is an imperialistic aggressor!" rant."

Well, you tell me now, were those strikes Clinton launched very effective? Apparently not, which is another good indication one can't fight terrorism by launching a couple of missiles on a foreign country.


"Did any of YOU predict the attacks? Cuz if you did, then you should be in jail for not notifying anyone"

There were many more warnings coming in from non-US intelligence agencies than you seem to be aware of.



Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1381 times:

Actually Schoenorama brings up a good point.

Prior to 9/11 there where several airliner plots, such at the transpacific airliner one that where FOILED which would indicate that the terrorism countersteps being taken at that time where doing their job.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1380 times:

Kerry is under no threat from terrorists. After all, the terrorists WANT their champion to win, the man who will grant them their wishes at last.


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineSchoenorama From Spain, joined Apr 2001, 2440 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1370 times:

L-188:

"Actually Schoenorama brings up a good point."

I've just made a screen-capture of that remark! Wow! It must be the first time (and probably the last) that YOU, of all, make such a remark about of posting of mine.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Jwenting (Jeroentje):

"Kerry is under no threat from terrorists. After all, the terrorists WANT their champion to win, the man who will grant them their wishes at last."

Actually, they'd be much better of with another four years of Bush. Look at the increase of terrorism-attacks around the world since he decided to attack Iraq, look at the support al-Qaeda and alike is getting right now.




Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1371 times:

I doubt it is the first and doubt it will be the last, you just see the world a bit different.


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineNosedive From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1368 times:

Kerry is under no threat from terrorists. After all, the terrorists WANT their champion to win, the man who will grant them their wishes at last.

And pray tell, what would Kerry do, bend over backwards for them? I think not.

As for the Larry King incident, so what? If he didn't have the time today, that doesn't mean he wont have the time later on. Kerry never implicitly stated that'd he'd never read the report, just that he hasn't had the time, yet. Furthermore, read a few lines down: KING: When do you -- when do you get your briefing?
KERRY: We're arranging it. It's at the end of the week I'll get it.


Also, as Kerry also pointed out , KING: Executive... KERRY: ...some executive, some public. Ronald Reagan came to the office as a governor with no foreign policy experience. George Bush came with zero foreign policy experience and used Dick Cheney as his buffer to say, well, this will be OK. So if we want to polarize this, let's spin it both ways  Laugh out loud. But my point here is that Kerry is using his resources given to him, and is better off than many of his predecessors were at this stage of the game- remember the "stategery" v "lockbox" skit on SNL? A stretched example, but political satire can reflect the mood for or against a person. In 2000, as witnessed by my very stretched example (I really just wanted to use SNL  Smile), the mood was that Bush was extremely weak in foreign policy. Yet he still got the presidency, no matter how much you dispute it. The same went for Reagan, who faced that grave threat of communism and history looks at him kindly.

So my question is again, so what? So what if Kerry hasn't read the report by the interview? As witnessed by other presidents, you can get into office if you're "too busy" to be briefed on foreign policy. Will the same thing happen come November, hopefully November? Stay tuned.

Asked if the timing of the terror concerns might be aimed at stealing political thunder from the announcement of John Edwards as the democratic vice presidential candidate, Daschle replied, "The report is so sobering and so serious that I cannot bring myself to believe anyone in this administration would use this for political purposes."

Well Daschle may say that, but we here at A.net know how to spin things!


User currently offlineCptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3220 posts, RR: 12
Reply 19, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1342 times:

Nosedive wrote: "...Will the same thing happen come November...?..."

Don't you mean December?  Smile (Courtesy: Jay Leno) Regards...Jack



all best; jack
User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1316 times:

Kerry is under no threat from terrorists. After all, the terrorists WANT their champion to win, the man who will grant them their wishes at last.

Jwenting, if you REALLY believe that Kerry is "champion" for the terrorists, then you've lost all sense of reality. John Kerry is no friend of a terrorist, and he won't be. If you think that, you're a lunatic. Not "maybe" but "for sure".

I could easily argue that Mr. Bush as been a boon for terrorists, looking at the situation in Iraq these days, but that isn't the truth, and neither is what you alluded to. You're veiled jab that somehow Kerry is sympathetic of terrorism is load of horse shit that could fertilize a thousand-acre farm for a year.


User currently offlineGo Canada! From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 2955 posts, RR: 11
Reply 21, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1280 times:

Actually, al queda sources have been reported to say that they want Bush to win because if Kerry wins then theres more chance of america and europe being united and that Kerry would still hunt the terrorists down.


It is amazing what can be accomplised when nobody takes the credit
User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4125 posts, RR: 8
Reply 22, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1270 times:

B4e- You said it perfectly. I completely agree with you. Welcome to my RU.

I think its disgusting how both Democrats and Republicans have made 9/11 into something political. We all screwed up.



"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
User currently offlineBoeing4ever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1232 times:

Schoenorama,

Long time no speak! When was it last time? Big grin

Now, on to your post...it's simply a case of coulda, woulda, shoulda...and it's much deeper and even more complex than that. You forget the state of mind of the whole world...and yes, the US is part of the world, last I checked.  Big grin How many terrorist warning does the US and other countries get a day now? Better yet, how many up to September 10th? Not all warning were credible. All those warnings raised red flags, but they never warned what was going to be hit, and when. On top of that, at the time, neither the FBI or CIA could have felt those warnings to be credible. Whatever went through their minds, we'll never fully know.

Well, you tell me now, were those strikes Clinton launched very effective? Apparently not, which is another good indication one can't fight terrorism by launching a couple of missiles on a foreign country.

The fact is, every time the US defends itself (this is before the Iraq war), we are labeled as warmongers by our allies. It literally did take 9/11 to finally get a number of countries willing enough to deal with the Taliban. Missiles aren't always effective, no, but military action was going to have to be taken sooner or later. (again, leave out Iraq, it has nothing to do with 9/11). Before 9/11 though, Clinton or Bush would have been crucified.

There were many more warnings coming in from non-US intelligence agencies than you seem to be aware of.

Many more warnings? Again, we get thousands of warnings every day. Not all are credible. To insist that one party or another dropped the ball is sad considering there are multiple factors at play. Perhaps MD-90's 767 in the WTC thread should also have been seen as a warning...or this little tidbit that I saw on TV on its airdate:

http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/Lone%20Gunmen/The_Lone_Gunmen_Episode_1.htm

When I first heard about the attacks, I immediately thought of that episode. The whole event seemed lifted from a B rate Hollywood spy movie.

Again, Hindsight is 20/20.

B4e-Forever New Frontiers


User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 6013 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1226 times:

The fact is, every time the US defends itself (this is before the Iraq war), we are labeled as warmongers by our allies. It literally did take 9/11 to finally get a number of countries willing enough to deal with the Taliban.

Eh, leading members of the Taliban visited Texas while Dubya was govenor there - not to mention that they visited the State Department in D.C. IIRC, the Taliban even offered bin Ladin on a silver platter, though I'm not sure if it was in the last few months of Clinton or in the early days of Dubya.


25 Goose : "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
26 Mdsh00 : Before 9/11 though, Clinton or Bush would have been crucified. To add to that, I think many of the Clinton accusers seem to forget that many of his Re
27 Schoenorama : Boeing4ever: "Now, on to your post...it's simply a case of coulda, woulda, shoulda...and it's much deeper and even more complex than that. You forget
28 JGPH1A : So what - Tom Ridge yelling "Oh God we're all gonna be murdered in our beds ! " for the 11th time that week - oooh major breaking news ! Why should Jo
29 Boeing4ever : Terrorism isn't something which was invented on 9/11. It has been around for ages in different forms. Whether a terrorist strike kills 1 person or 3 o
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Cessna "Cleared For Takeoff" Kit For Sale (NEW) posted Thu Nov 16 2006 19:36:13 by L-1011Alpha
Child's Dead Body Staged For Filming By "helper" posted Fri Aug 11 2006 15:37:37 by Jamesag96
Another "What's For Dinner" Thread posted Mon May 15 2006 18:35:45 by ANCFlyer
Students Arrested For Planning Another "Columbine" posted Fri Apr 21 2006 17:31:29 by Greyhound
Does Hugo Chavez Have "Takeover" Plan For Southern posted Tue Apr 4 2006 15:57:50 by Mrmeangenes
Some "Passion" Tips For Skidmarks posted Thu Mar 30 2006 19:19:56 by Cosec59
Here's One For The "wtf" Department posted Tue Feb 28 2006 00:12:10 by Corey07850
UK Graduates "Unfit For Work" posted Tue Feb 7 2006 13:49:57 by Cornish
Cronkite "Time For U.S. To Leave Iraq" posted Mon Jan 16 2006 06:50:17 by Clipperhawaii
Refusing To "volunteer For The Draft" posted Sun Mar 27 2005 18:43:20 by Duke