Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bush 'bounce' Dissipates  
User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4429 posts, RR: 15
Posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 960 times:

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html


The overblown Bush bounce


The lights inside Madison Square Garden had barely been shut off late last week when Time and Newsweek magazines both unveiled new polls declaring that George W. Bush had blazed ahead to a double-digit lead in the presidential race. While some Kerry supporters were surely deflated by the news, others were skeptical, noting that it would be nearly impossible to meaningfully assess the effect of the Republican Convention before the holiday weekend. (We won't bother speculating whether Time and Newsweek were simply rushing to weigh in first on the expected Bush bounce, or whether their Bush-friendly numbers had anything to do with the "liberal" mainstream media that conservatives keep griping about.)

Over at Donkey Rising, Ruy Teixeira says today's new CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll is vindication for those who were more prepared to buy a Labor Day vacation package to Florida than they were Friday's headline poll numbers.

Teixeira notes that today's is the first poll that truly measures Bush's bounce -- a modest two-point one, among registered and likely voters alike -- and that the minor gain actually doesn't look so rosy for Bush when put into historical perspective.

"Bush's 2-point bounce from his convention (which, remember, is defined as the change in a candidate's level of support, not in margin) is the worst ever received by an incumbent president, regardless of party, and the worst ever received by a Republican candidate, whether incumbent or not. In 2000, Bush received an 8-point bounce. And even his hapless father received a 5-point bounce in 1992."

The new survey does reflect some favorable results for the Bush campaign: For example, the typically gloomy-faced Vice President Cheney is now viewed "slightly more positively" than before the convention, rising four points to 48 percent of voters who think of him "favorably." But the Gallup poll also shows that the Democratic gathering in Boston was more effective in persuading Americans:

"Forty-one percent of Americans say what they saw or read of the Republican convention makes them more likely to support Bush, while 38% say less likely. Americans were slightly more enthusiastic about the Democratic convention, as 44% said it made them more likely to vote for Kerry, and 30% said less likely. That 41% figure for the Republican convention is actually the lowest Gallup has measured dating back to the 1984 Democratic convention."

Apparently, Americans didn't much care for the dark musings of Sen. Zell Miller, or the rest of the GOP attacks leveled at Kerry from the GOP stage in Manhattan.

"Half the public thought the Republicans 'spent too much time criticizing the Democrats' at their convention, while 39% thought the Republicans 'achieved the right balance between criticizing the Democrats and saying positive things about themselves.'

"Similarly, 52% of Americans say the Republican Party has attacked John Kerry unfairly, compared with 48% who said this before the Republican convention."

The last time a GOP get-together was rated as being more negative in tone than this one? Late August of 1992, according to Gallup, when 56 percent of surveyed voters were turned off by Republican rancor -- and the first incumbent President Bush was on his way to losing to Bill Clinton.

-- Mark Follman


Likewise, today, Rassmussen reports showed Bush and Kerry tied, while the American Research Group showed Kerry leading Bush by one point.

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWhitehatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 948 times:

"Similarly, 52% of Americans say the Republican Party has attacked John Kerry unfairly, compared with 48% who said this before the Republican convention."

Probably the most telling point of the above post.

Dirty politics isn't pretty to watch, and those who practice it often forget that their sharp jabs often carry a recoil. It happened here in 1997. The electorate didn't like the Conservatives trying to shift their campaign on to personal attacks on Tony Blair.

The Swift Boat people have probably done a lot more harm than good to the Bush campaign.


User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5477 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 931 times:

Bush 'bounce' Dissipates

It'll be completely wiped out by the end of the week.

The Iraq Death Toll and the airing last night of 'Uncovered' is bound to do irrevesible damage.


BN747



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 23
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 929 times:

If you're using Salon.com as a source, then you need to find some new ones. Salon is nothing but a left wing rag that is kept out of insolvency by millions of dollars dumped into it by a bunch of rich liberals.

Likewise, today, Rassmussen reports showed Bush and Kerry tied, while the American Research Group showed Kerry leading Bush by one point.

Rasmussen is an unreliable pollster who has been off in every election. He missed 2000 by 8 points and missed the 2002 elections as well. His poll goes back and forth within a 5 point range. As for ARG, they're so biased toward the Democrats they might as well be part of the Kerry campaign. They oversample Democrats by up to 15% in many of their polls.

[Edited 2004-09-08 00:42:38]


"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 16931 posts, RR: 48
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 908 times:

"Bush 'bounce' Dissipates
"

What did you expect a BOUNCE to do? Wouldn't be a bounce if it stayed up now would it....



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 906 times:

Rasmussen is an unreliable pollster who has been off in every election.

Yet, I believe you have used them as a source in the past.

N


User currently offlineAloha73g From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2335 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 892 times:

with all polls you HAVE to look at whether they are among registered voters or likely voters

republicans generally do much better with likely voters

the time and newsweek polls showed a 1 point bush lead with registered voters and an 11 point lead with likely voters. i think the CNN/Gallup poll showed that too

aloha!



Aloha Airlines - The Spirit Moves Us. Gone but NEVER Forgotten. Aloha, A Hui Hou!
User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1892 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 877 times:

I think he should just bounce out of the White House.


Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8616 posts, RR: 43
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 872 times:

"I think he should just bounce out of the White House."

Very, very, very well said.  Big thumbs up To any American who wants to do the rest of the world a favour, too: Vote Kerry/Edwards! Even if they screw up, they won't do as much damage as George Bush.



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13254 posts, RR: 62
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 865 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Interesting - even the Today show this morning was citing a new poll out showing a 7 point gap.

Nevertheless, it's even more interesting to note that Kerry received absolutely NO "bounce" whatsoever following the Democratic National Convention - and while these figures don't necessarily mean anything, if Bush's bounce looks bad, Kerry's total lack of one is an absolute disaster!




"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8616 posts, RR: 43
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 859 times:

"if Bush's bounce looks bad, Kerry's total lack of one is an absolute disaster!"

Which applies to almost all of Kerry's campaign up to this date... as it seems here in Europe. I thought this man wanted to unseat a US president, one would imagine he'd have got off of his butt by now.  Sad



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineSolarix From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 841 times:

Even if they screw up, they won't do as much damage as George Bush.

Why is that?


User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8616 posts, RR: 43
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 837 times:

Just look at the damage Bush has done:

He created unprecedented genuine hatred (not inflicted by governments like during the Cold War) against the US and, to a lesser extent, the Western World in general when declaring war on Iraq.

He alienated NATO and other allies with his "either with us or against us" rhetoric, a major fault in a time when a strong and united western alliance was needed to fight terrorism.

He has created a record budget deficit which will have to be paid off in the future - and if that harms the US economy, it will harm each and every economy on this planet.



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 832 times:

But look at what Kerry would do:

Nothing!

His policies are almost identical, that is if he'd actually bothered to tell us his policies. The only real thing Kerry has going for him is that he's not George Bush. In most other countries, he'd be right wing both economically and socially.


User currently offlineWhitehatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 826 times:

In most other countries, he'd be right wing both economically and socially.

That's actually very true!

In Britain he'd fit nicely into the Conservatives as one of their moderate wing.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 825 times:

In most other countries, he'd be right wing both economically and socially.

That's just not quite true. He is a moderate Democrat, yes.

I am in the camp that will vote for Kerry just because he's not George Bush. He's not a great candidate, but he's by far and away the lesser of two evils.

N


User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8616 posts, RR: 43
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 823 times:

Well, I don't like Kerry either, and he sure has failed to do a lot of (campaign) work that needed to be done. BUT: compared to George Bush, nothing can be worse, although it's sad that this election is all about this.


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4429 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 812 times:

Kerry has not run as effective a campaign as we had hoped, I'll give you that one. There should be NO reason for Bush to be in a position to win at all this year. NONE.

Bush is running his campaign like a challenger....completely ignoring the last 4 years and saying things like how much some parts of america are struggling and what he'll do to fix it.


GEORGE, YOU HAD 4 YEARS TO FIX IT, DAMN IT!!


Broken and empty promises. He's acting like the last 4 years were just handed to him. There is no reason for him to win.


And the blame can only rest on Kerry for not having soundly trounced Bush at this point. There were several opportunities, Kerry blew almost all of them.



Yeah, I'm pissed.



But I don't support Bush and never will. And I'll fight to get Kerry elected anyway. This one is too damn important and I think even you bushies will regret your vote in due time, should Bush get re-elected.


Nevertheless:

Nevertheless, it's even more interesting to note that Kerry received absolutely NO "bounce" whatsoever following the Democratic National Convention


Bullshit. Kerry had an 11-point lead according to the L.A. Times after the convention, and guess what, that poll was in error because they polled more democrats than republicans.


KINDA LIKE TIME AND NEWSWEEK DID?


The double-digit bounce was a myth for Bush. And so was Kerry's double-digit bounce as well.


So there you have it. Oh yeah, I suggest checking out washingtonpost.com and the new york times for some reliable news sources.


Hey....B757300, you said that gallup was a reliable source before. Would they still be reliable...if they show Kerry in the lead?

For all your accusations against Kerry you sure flip-flop as much as the wind changes direction so long as it serves to better the image and perception of your candidate.


User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 809 times:

That's just not quite true. He is a moderate Democrat, yes.

But it is though - name me a country where he'd be considered left wing.

He doesn't have any real policies that stand out against Bush. If he just came out and said "I'm against the war on Iraq", or "I'd end farm subsidies", or "I'll reduce CO2 emissions by 20% in 5 years" rather than trying to be everything at once, then at least people would have an actual alternative to Bush.


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13254 posts, RR: 62
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 805 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Nevertheless, it's even more interesting to note that Kerry received absolutely NO "bounce" whatsoever following the Democratic National Convention


Bullshit. Kerry had an 11-point lead according to the L.A. Times after the convention, and guess what, that poll was in error because they polled more democrats than republicans.



From what I've seen so far, Kerry never increased his margin over President Bush following the Democratic National Convention.



http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-08-01-poll-kerry_x.htm

In the survey, taken Friday and Saturday, Bush led Kerry 50%-46% among likely voters. Independent candidate Ralph Nader was at 2%.

The survey showed Kerry losing 1 percentage point and Bush gaining 4 percentage points from a poll taken the week before the Boston convention.

The change in support was within the poll's margin of error of +/-4 percentage points in the sample of 763 likely voters. But it was nonetheless surprising, the first time since the chaotic Democratic convention in 1972 that a candidate hasn't gained ground during his convention





[Edited 2004-09-08 03:22:48]


"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineItsjustme From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 2768 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 770 times:

Broken and empty promises. He's acting like the last 4 years were just handed to him

They WERE handed to him! Thanks to brother Jeb and his Floridians who don't know how to count.


User currently offlineNWA Man From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1828 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 759 times:

Of course, the lack of a large "bounce" for either candidate this year has much to do with the fact that unlike in previous election years, the major broadcast networks didn't televise the conventions.

Great decision, by the way. Let's not even mention the acceptance speeches... why air something like Barack Obama's rousing speech or Zell Miller's heartfelt anti-Kerry diatribe when you can run reruns of "The King of Queens" or "Celebrity Fear Factor"?

What a country, man... what a country.


Regards,

N-Dub



Create your own luck.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bush’s Convention Bounce Vanishes As Race Tightens posted Fri Sep 17 2004 14:31:23 by Qb001
Congress Sends Bush Bill To Ban Contact With Hamas posted Fri Dec 8 2006 18:42:31 by RJpieces
3 Show Up In Same Dress As Laura Bush In Party posted Thu Dec 7 2006 18:34:25 by Jimyvr
Impeach Bush? posted Wed Dec 6 2006 17:07:33 by Matt D
Bush's Iraq War Tactiic Backfired..Heres Why.. posted Wed Dec 6 2006 15:03:19 by Wardialer
Bush Wants Flu Shots For Illegals.. posted Wed Nov 29 2006 17:23:22 by Airlinelover
Bush Still In Denial Over Iraq posted Tue Nov 28 2006 22:09:12 by Falcon84
Finally We Can All Now Forgive George W. Bush... posted Mon Nov 27 2006 03:45:45 by Derico
Purse, Cell Phone Taken From Bush Daughter posted Wed Nov 22 2006 02:31:05 by AerospaceFan
Caption The 'Bush On Tour' Pic posted Tue Nov 21 2006 19:17:30 by 9V