Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Sinking Of The Titanic Was An Insurace Fraud  
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 25
Posted (10 years 2 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3258 times:

So, was the ship that sank really the Titanic?

It is the the most infamous disaster story in shipping history.

The "unsinkable" Southampton liner Titanic went down in the freezing waters
of the Atlantic Ocean with the loss of more than 1,500 lives on April 15, 1912.

Or Did She?

Theroists say that the titanic was swapped with her crumbling sister the Olympic. As the Olympic had been involved in an accident with no insurance payout because it was her fault. They say that the White Star Lines swapped the ships identity, News reels can confirm that two different ships were once publicised as the titanic. Which one was sent to its death in the atlantic?

There is alot of support to this story, if you search on the web you will find it...

Really interesting to read and think about.

Do you belive in this new story?


Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3240 times:

Interesting, if a bit "tin foil hat" - do you have any sources for this ? I'd like to read them. If true, it would be an amazing story ! Thing is though, how would you keep it secret from the 1000-odd crewmembers who used to work on the old Titanic, who have to pack up and move to the new Titanic (formerly Olympic) or at least get new hats that say "Olympic" on them. You can be pretty sure that at the very least, the poor mug who had to paint over the name of the Olympic with "Titanic" would have mentioned the fact down the pub after the damn thing sank  Smile

User currently offlineMikedlayer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 399 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3239 times:

I saw it on that Conspiracies programme on Sky One the other week, a very interesting theory!

I think I do believe the accusations to be honest...I mean White Star Line must have been pretty angered with no insurance pay out from the collision the Olympic had a year before the Titanic set sail from Southampton, so I can see them changing it around and sinking it to get the pay out.

I've always thought the circumstances that night in 1912 were always a little convenient. For example a clear sky, no moon, black ice, the Titanic at full throtte and heading straight towards an ice burg field even though they'd had several warnings...and also the s.o.s. message not being sent until something like 30 minutes after the collision with the ice burg! Seems all a bit fishy to me...maybe this might spark more interest in raising the Titanic and more money will be put into a project to do so, maybe we might find out the truth then!

Mike


User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 32
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3233 times:

It's an old theory, and one that has been pretty thoroughly discredited. Olympic was far from 'crumbling' in 1912; in fact she was still new, and very, very similar to her sister. The accident with the warship was during trials and resulted in a hull plate being punctured, but this was repaired very quickly.

Crucially, the sisters were not identical. Olympic's promenade deck did not have any cladding along the side it's whole length. The ship on the seabed off Nova Scotia does.



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3212 times:

And of the pieces brought back from the seabed, everything is marked with Titanic's build number, not Olympic's. If the ships had been swapped you would expect to see the opposite.

As Sulman says, the theory has been thoroughly discredited.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently onlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21496 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 23 hours ago) and read 3182 times:

...apart from the fact that committing insurance fraud by murdering a large number of your best customers and in the process basically destroying your own company doesn´t look like a really appealing idea...  Insane

User currently offlineStudentFlyer From Australia, joined Sep 2004, 688 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 23 hours ago) and read 3167 times:

Hmm.... a very interesting conspiracy here..... and everything seems a bit fishy, but anyway, it could be that someone is just trying to gain popularity by conspiring to this accident... Mind you I do agree with Sulman and Banco's facts.

User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 23 hours ago) and read 3164 times:

To be fair to the conspiracy theorists Klaus (and it isn't something I do very often!  Big grin ) I don't think they are suggesting that the sinking was deliberate the way it turned out. They believe that the intention was to get everyone off the ship faking a crisis and then scuttle it. Allegedly a rescue ship was "nearby" where the Titanic was supposed to be to carry out an orderly evacuation. The ship wasn't meant to hit an iceberg at full speed (no kidding).

Ultimately, the theory founders (pun intended) on too many facts. The artifacts of the wreck being unquestionably Titanic, not Olympic, the requirement for thousands of dockyard workers needing to be in on the scam and then keeping their traps shut etc etc.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently onlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21496 posts, RR: 53
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 22 hours ago) and read 3149 times:

Banco: They believe that the intention was to get everyone off the ship faking a crisis and then scuttle it. Allegedly a rescue ship was "nearby" where the Titanic was supposed to be to carry out an orderly evacuation. The ship wasn't meant to hit an iceberg at full speed (no kidding).

They would certainly not have left Titanic with far too few boats if that would have been the plan. It´s not even plausible! Other conspiracies at least have thatBig grin


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 22 hours ago) and read 3142 times:

Actually Klaus, in the convoluted logic that characterises these kind of things, the lack of lifeboats is regarded as part of the evidence for the conspiracy.  Insane Big grin

In other words, since a ship will be taking people off there's no need for a full complement of lifeboats because they can go to and from the rescue ship etc.

I know, I know! Don't have a go at me about it, I'm on your side!  Insane  Big grin



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently onlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21496 posts, RR: 53
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 22 hours ago) and read 3136 times:

So let´s share a healthy laugh about it...!  Big thumbs up

User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5423 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 22 hours ago) and read 3129 times:

Oh come ON you guys, don't you know? A Wright Flyer with a missile launcher attached to it sank the Titanic

-Signed,
Phil Jayhan of letsroll911.org



South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offlineDtwclipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 22 hours ago) and read 3124 times:

This is up there with the legend that Titanic Pax viewed a Silent version of the Poseiden Adventure the night the ship sank!

A much lesser known -- but no less remarkable coincidence -- is that at the very moment the Titanic struck an iceberg in the north Atlantic late in the evening of 14 April 1912, the film The Poseidon Adventure -- a movie about the desperate efforts of a group of passengers to survive the sinking of an ocean liner -- was being screened aboard ship.

The film industry was still in its adolescence in 1912, but it was already taking rapid strides towards maturity. The short flip card films viewed on customer-cranked Kinetoscopes and Mutoscopes in nickelodeons had given way to more elaborate films that were projected onto screens for audiences in movie theaters. These films were short (generally no more than one reel in length), and of course they were both silent and black-and-white, but they had already captured the imagination of a population eager for new forms of entertainment. The White Star line, proudly dedicated to sparing no expense in ensuring that its new flagship Titanic provided every luxury their passengers could desire, did not overlook this still relatively novel one: the Titanic carried its own projector and a complement of movies rented from the British office of a U.S. film distributor.




http://www.snopes.com/lost/poseidon.htm


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 months 20 hours ago) and read 3082 times:

Case closed, 'Clipper.  Big grin


She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineDl021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 months 20 hours ago) and read 3073 times:

I read that the Poseidon Adventure was showing on the Titanic.

I just did not know Ernest Borgnine was that old.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 months 20 hours ago) and read 3065 times:

Not forgetting that Gene Hackman somehow survived, gave up the cloth and became a submarine captain - presumably so he could search for the Titanic. Hmm, the conspiracy theorists may have had a point...  Big grin


She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (10 years 2 months 20 hours ago) and read 3056 times:

Still, toys with your mind over the truth...


Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineB2707SST From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 1369 posts, RR: 59
Reply 17, posted (10 years 2 months 16 hours ago) and read 2987 times:

Aside from a total lack of positive evidence, there are many problems with this theory, some of which have been noted:

- Photographs from the wreck show that the propellers bear Titanic's Harland & Wolff hull number (401), not Olympic's (400).

- Olympic and Titanic had subtle but significant structural differences. These included the enclosure of the A-Deck forward promenade, the Cafe Parisian on B-Deck for first class passengers, and the replacement of B-Deck's public promenade with cabins and two suites featuring private promenades. These changes (especially the last) were involved major structural redesigns, and it would have been very expensive to retrofit Olympic with them (and possibly remove them on Titanic, depending on when the scheme was launched).

- After the Titanic disaster, Olympic's double bottom was extended up to the waterline, requiring a lengthy and very costly dry-docking, and more importantly, major structural work in the very areas damaged by the Hawke. There seems little reason to swap ships and sink the Olympic when such substantial modifications followed the accident. Even an intentional (non-iceberg) sinking must have involved hull damage, and given the Olympic class' "unsinkable" reputation, White Star must have known that substantial refitting work would be required after the loss of one.


White Star did propose that the rescue ship Carpathia, which was en route to the Mediterranean and not provisioned for hundreds of extra passengers, rendezvous with the Olympic in mid-ocean and transfer the Titanic survivors to her. Needless to say, the survivors were not enthusiastic about boarding Titanic's nearly identical twin, so the Carpathia returned to New York.

--B2707SST



Keynes is dead and we are living in his long run.
User currently offlineLogan22L From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 2 months 16 hours ago) and read 2970 times:

...and Shelley Winters still looked like an 80 year old cow in 1912.

Logan



User currently offlineJAXpax From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (10 years 2 months 16 hours ago) and read 2947 times:

The 1972 Poseidon Adventure was a remake of the 1911 film... if you bother to read what is at Dtwclipper's link.

User currently offlineDtwclipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (10 years 2 months 16 hours ago) and read 2941 times:

Everything in this section is a spoof.... passengers on the Titanic viewing a 1912 silent version of The Poseidon Adventure while their doomed ship was sinking out from under them

http://www.snopes.com/lost/false.htm


Even the link to the IMDB is bogus.

[Edited 2004-09-30 21:58:13]

User currently offlineAGC525 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 989 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (10 years 2 months 14 hours ago) and read 2902 times:

I've heard that too, but I think it's more of an urban legend.


I'm suprised no one has blamed Bush for it, yet  Insane



American Aviation: From Kitty Hawk to the Moon in 66 years!
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2820 times:

Impossible... The OLYMPIC was sold for scrap in the late 1930s. This whole post...


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 23, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2785 times:

And let's not forget Morgan Robertson's book "Futility" published in 1898 about the sinking of the Titan when the "unsinkable" ship hit an iceberg on its maiden voyage with huge loss of life because there were insufficient lifeboats.

Must be a conspiracy eh?  Big grin



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2739 times:

Banco.. I did come across a copy of that book a couple years back and had the chance to read it. It was my great-grandmother's copy. That was one scary book.

25 777ER : Why would a company want to murder hundreds of its customers and staff just to get money?
26 JetService : the Titanic carried its own projector and a complement of movies rented from the British office of a U.S. film distributor. White Star Lines was only
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
You Thought The Olsen Twins 18 Countdown Was Weird posted Mon Jun 5 2006 09:21:00 by TedTAce
It Was The Summer Of 1976 A True Story posted Thu Mar 23 2006 17:53:35 by Dougloid
Why Did The USA Invade Iraq And Was It Worth It posted Mon Mar 6 2006 23:30:34 by Highpeaklad
The Statement Of Purpose - Core Of An Application posted Tue Sep 20 2005 18:59:02 by Mrniji
What Is The Speed Of An Explosion? posted Sun Mar 6 2005 23:57:04 by Lehpron
Wolfowitz Spilling The Beans.. War Was For Oil posted Wed Jun 4 2003 18:14:35 by CPH-R
What Was The Name Of That German Easter Dish? posted Sun Apr 20 2003 15:07:39 by L-188
Baggage Handler In Paris Was The Victim Of A Plot posted Fri Jan 10 2003 16:53:00 by Ah727
What Is The Worse Acting In An Otherwise Good Film posted Fri Oct 18 2002 11:11:15 by L-188
The Basque Party Was Outlawed In Spain. posted Thu Jun 27 2002 12:52:44 by Ronen