Wietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 54 Posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1534 times:
Could you please have a look at http://www.wietsedegraaf.com/ and tell me what your observations are? How is the speed of it, how is the content, do you like the lay-out and functionality? Any remarks are welcome!
VSLover From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1901 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1498 times:
wow, some truly fantastic work there!
i dont like the font on the primary page. it is too much serif you know? with such a basic (yet tasteful) home page, the font maybe ought to be a bit more simple/smooth.
i like the home page. on the portfolio page, i dont like how one of the links is "about me" where there really ought to just be a text link at the bottom to "about me" as you already have rather than a linked pic.
oh on the about me section, maybe have a separate link through there that links to your equipment.
Thecoz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1481 times:
I like it. The first page is very simple. That's how it should be. Most of the time, web sites are so cluttered that people don't bother to explore further.
Since your photography is great, and you have a photography based site, why not incorporate one of your photos into the interface to create a strong focal point. Perhaps even use it to further develop a solid color scheme. You never know what you may discover.
Qb001 From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2053 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1447 times:
I used to be a project director in web site production. I've directed the production of monstrous web sites.
The basic design of the screen should follow the rule of the "inverted L", that is the top part of your main screen is for the main areas of the site, and the left hand side is a sub-menu.
Take a look at this site (yep, one of mine). Click on the "About" and "Help" and look how the left-hand side menu reacts. That's an "inverted L" in action and it has been demonstrated to be the most usable Web site design. Also, Verdana is the best font to use.
Now, you do what you want with this advice.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good theory.
F9Widebody From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1604 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1398 times:
One thing I would suggest is using a Title, kinda unprofessional imo to have the title be http://www.wietsedegraaf.com. Other than that, it looks great, never knew your photography was of such a wide array of subjects.
MYT332 From Australia, joined Sep 2003, 9114 posts, RR: 68
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1310 times:
Hey, I like the site.
The layout is good as you can nearly always get back to the homepage using the 'Home' link at the bottom. I like the way you used frames to set out the pages but even more so that you actually bothered making another site that uses tables, very thoughtful!
The design is nice too. The black, grey and whites go nice together and you have your titles at the top in a size and font that stands out to the rest of the page. Looks good, as do your smaller titles.
You have some sort of roll over effect for the links as well which isn't too fancy but it's a nice user friendly addition to the site.
A few small things that could do with changing are that on the portfolio home page, the images are a little bit too large. I know you want to keep the quality there but in total all the images add up to 0.5mb (514kb) which isn't great for people with dial-up connections. I even found it a bit slow to load and I have a from of broadband. Try making the total page size be around 100kb, that's the mean size.
Another minor detail is that when you view your large photo's in the portfolio section, say in the aviation category, they don't actually stay in a web page anymore thus they loose any link back to the site unless you hit 'back' in the browser. This is fine I guess but what you could do is either target the photos to open in a new window, resized slightly larger than the actual photo and then insert a close button. This would also give you room for some type of caption.
Another way would be you could keep the photos in the same window as now but place them in a slideshow with html links, such as the one Dreamweaver can make. It makes it a bit easier to navigate about.
Oh and I would also make the 'large' version of the photo's bigger in size. They look like great photos but are only fairly small. Show them off like they deserve to be!
I've kind of yacked on a bit here but you did ask for it, literally!
I'm not really that great at web design myself, I know what you are supposed to do, I'm just too lazy to do it hence why my site is in disarray!
Good job on the meta tags and the site in general.
Asbg From Israel, joined Feb 2000, 538 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1261 times:
You have a really nice website. The photos are great, really professional. The only thing that bothers me is the design itself. It's dull in my taste and a bit gothic, somewhat depressing. You were right using a design that blends in with the photos but I would give the background more life.
BREmer From Germany, joined May 2004, 551 posts, RR: 15
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1260 times:
I like the site, and especially the photos.
Here's what I would do differently if were you (which I'm not, so it's all just my personal opinion). I think some of my points have already been mentioned.
1) I'd use a different font, which is basic and thin like Arial Narrow (maybe a little more stretched), it looks more stylish on a black background
Also, fontwise you could distinguish your name a bit from the rest of the site - since you are the brand (the photographer) in that case, just do some experiments with some fonts (depends on how you wanna spell yourself - if you go for 'wietsedegraaf' Haettenschweiler would look cool)
2) If you do Frames on the left, make sure they are always there with the same links. If I click on your photo equipment link for example it changes from 'Home-About Me-Portfolio' to 'Home-Up'. To me that's a bit confusing.