Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Separating Chemicals From Another?  
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 976 times:

Can this be done, or has it been done:

A machine that can create/strain methane or hydrogen out of some/any standard hydrocarbon fuel(s). what needs to go in/out to make this happen?









The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN6376m From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 962 times:

Isn't this called a fractional distillation tower? As long as the boiling points are different you can do it.

User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8735 posts, RR: 42
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 958 times:

To get the hydrogen, just burn the fuel you have, collect the water vapour contained in the exhaust gases and separate Hydrogen from Oxygen electrically. Use the heat of the fire to generate the electricity needed if you care about efficiency.  Laugh out loud

Methane? Some nasty cracking would be needed for that one, and you'd get a load of residuals such as sulphur compounds. Not exactly an easy way to produce Methane.



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineCaptoveur From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 954 times:

It is simple.. just heat the source material and find the temp in the tower where the product you want condenses.. put your collection source there.. probably not something to do in your basement but it can be done.

User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14131 posts, RR: 62
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 937 times:

If you have liquid hydrocarbons, this usually means long chains of -C-c-c-c-, you can split them up in smaller parts using a process called "cracking".
The simplest way is to expose the hydrocarbon to great heat, this will cause C-C bonds to break up, afterwards you distill and seperate the new molecules. Other cracking processes use catalysts like Al2O3 and lower heat (better control). Methane is the simplest hydrocarbon CH4.

There are also processes for dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons, usually they are used to create hydrocarbons with double bonds -C=C- or triple bonds, these hydrocarbons are very reactive and form the base of many plastics.

Just get yourself a textbook on basic organic chemistry.

Jan


User currently offlineLogan22L From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 926 times:

Cracking can be done to produce methane; however, it is typically cheaper to perform hydraulic fracturing, where a fluid and sand is injected at high pressure into coal beds. The sand helps to prop open the natural fractures in the formation, and extraction wells recover naturally-occurring methane from the coal beds. Incidentally, Halliburton (of Dick Cheney fame) is a big player in this field.

Most standard hydrocarbon fuel (i.e., crude oil) is low in methane simply because of its gaseous nature, so the methane is lost relatively easily from the crude. As for hydrogen, it can be generated electrolytically from water, but not really from hydrocarbons. Not the easiest (or cheapest) thing to do, and not very safe on a large scale.

Logan


User currently offlineFDXmech From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3251 posts, RR: 34
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 913 times:

It's actually simple, until you combine them.

If their not combined, simply push the jars further apart.



You're only as good as your last departure.
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 897 times:

fractional distillation tower? I will look that up for sure thanks, and chemical uses for the word 'cracking'. I worry if i search for cracking and methane in google I'll end with meth-lab-how-to's.  Nuts

Aren't the flash points and boiling points for hydrocarbons close to each other, how are they kept from going off when doing this procedure of cracking?

Specifically, I was wondering about those ideas about hypersonic/suborbital airliners in our distant future...instead of hauling the cryogenic fuel to the airport, why not make it from standard JetA/B by placing one of these "cracking towers" at the airport facility? Wouldn't it be way cheaper?



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4128 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 891 times:

I think everyone got it right over here. You can separate by fractionation, polarity and organic vs. inorganic. Just remember that like dissolves in like.


"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
User currently offlineLogan22L From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 890 times:

Lehpron: I don't think that cracking is the best way to go here. While it will break down larger hydrocarbons, getting the process to go all the way to methane (and not hundreds of other side products) may not be feasible. The time and expense to do this is probably prohibitive. Why not just use the fuel you already have? I don't see the advantage to breaking it down. If you are looking at this from a cleaner burning perspective, then the cracked fuel would still have all the impurities that cause inefficiencies in combustion with Jet A. While they could be removed, this would be a difficult task at the airport itself. I don't think we want to have an active refinery alongside our runways. Given the expense of crude and the cracking/purification process, I think we're talking expensive here.

Your interest in alternatives to the norm is good - one thing about this is that at least the petroleum industry would be involved still, and that's about the only way alternatives can get developed. Talk of hydrogen, etc. just doesn't have the lobbying power. Maybe more research into zeolites (the catalysts used in cracking) would help move this idea along. I am trained as a chemist, but cracking isn't my area of expertise. Maybe some other member has more experience.

Logan



User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 883 times:

>> "Why not just use the fuel you already have?

Actually I have read that standard jet fuels like Jet A prematurely break down and decay when burned at higher temps which is usually associated with hypersonic combustion chambers -- that was why I asked.

It is just that liquid methane or hydrogen cannot be hauled like jet fuel, so I was thinking of making them at the airport facility, it would cut down costs of transportation and long term storage and safety. In this case it would be a temporary storage as direct input into the plane's refrigeration system.

Besides environment, it is really an efficiency issue. I was wondering if it would be chemically practical to build these machines at airports that would service future hypersonic airliners.


Of course, if this machine were placed inside the airplane as a fuel converter, then yes we may be able to use regular fuel, just there may be stuff dumped during the process...I assume cracking fuel will give off by-products?



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineJetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 876 times:

It's actually simple, until you combine them.

If their not combined, simply push the jars further apart.


LOL!!!

Then order the #2 at Taco Bell to get your methane.



"Shaddap you!"
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6840 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 871 times:

Methane at airports....? Lots of cows to eat the grass. They produce loads of the stuff.

Seriously though, I'd guess that the energy involved in breaking down the long chain HCs into methane would not make the process cost effective. Using bacteria might work, though not necessarily in the desired volumes.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 856 times:

What aspect of this process would make it costly? Size, output volume, rate of previous, the fact that there might not be this many number of units, etc.

Gimme an idea.



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineSOUTHAMERICA From Colombia, joined Dec 2003, 2497 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 851 times:


Not to mention time, which can also be a huge issue. While the vast majority of inorganic/mineral reactions take no more than a few seconds to happen, almost all organic proceedures take a lot of time and patience, unless an accelerator (which can be sometimes very expesive) is used.

A lot of energy, as Oly720man said, is to be used. While the C=C type of ties are relatively easy to brake, the C-C groups, representative of saturated hydrocarbons, are extremely stable and hard to break. That's why saturated or simple hydrocarbons do not tend to participate much in chemical reactions, while other type of hydrocarbons (insaturated ones) do.


SOUTHAMERICA


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Separating Chemicals From Another? posted Wed Oct 6 2004 02:26:15 by Lehpron
AC-130 Video Footage ( From Another Poster ) posted Sun Dec 22 2002 20:54:34 by Galaxy5
How Do You Post A Pic That Is From Another Site? posted Sat Oct 13 2001 23:33:23 by Dragon-wings
Another "Bright" Idea From CA: Ban Lightbulbs posted Thu Feb 1 2007 00:10:39 by Matt D
Another Great Video From The VAW-116 Sunkings posted Sun Jan 28 2007 04:04:31 by AirTran737
Moving A 4.3 GB File From A Drive To Another posted Wed Oct 25 2006 15:00:53 by Aak777
From 1 Bush To Another posted Thu May 11 2006 08:59:54 by QANTAS077
Another Annoying Html Question From LHMark posted Tue Jul 13 2004 17:25:54 by LHMark
Another Great Republican From Illinois (Ryan) posted Sun Jan 12 2003 03:08:20 by Superfly
Another Wreckage Site 6 Miles From PA Crash posted Thu Sep 13 2001 17:51:03 by Milldoh