GKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24621 posts, RR: 58 Posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1261 times:
Was just wondering, if anyone knows offhand the actual population of London, England. By London, I only mean the actual place London, and not the area's which make up "London" if you know what I mean.
I think it's quite small, but wasnt sure
When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
GKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24621 posts, RR: 58 Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1245 times:
Thats something like the toal of the whole area of London. I want to know the actual population of London on it's own e.g not Westminster, Tottenham, Brentford, West Ham etc
When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
KEno From Malaysia, joined Feb 2004, 1841 posts, RR: 31 Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1222 times:
Strictly speaking, the only 'proper' London is the City of London i.e. the financial district. The area has a population of just over 7000 according to the year 2001 census. No surprise there because the area is mostly filled with financial institutions and no proper designated residential zone.
Arsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7791 posts, RR: 23 Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1177 times:
The population of the London metropolitan area (32 boroughs) is around 8 million as Thomas said, the population of greater London, i.e. the areas of which include bit's of Essex, Hertfordshire, Surrey etc is about 12 million.
PROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5439 posts, RR: 5 Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1155 times:
The population of the London metropolitan area (32 boroughs) is around 8 million as Thomas said, the population of greater London, i.e. the areas of which include bit's of Essex, Hertfordshire, Surrey etc is about 12 million.
If you defined London as including the commuter zone, in other words areas from which significant numbers of people commute to jobs in the metropolitan area, the total population no doubt would be a lot higher.
"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
Scotty From UK - Scotland, joined Dec 1999, 1875 posts, RR: 3 Reply 15, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1073 times:
Well Banco, I have heard it said that Scotland may have 5 million people but London has the densest population in the UK.
btw whats your favourite tube station? Mine's Earls Court because I always seem to get asked for directions by crowds of Japanese tourists like they think I know the place - makes me feel like a local (which I was for a time)
Banco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 55 Reply 18, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1065 times:
Well, you're worse than me in that case Scotty. I've never lived in London, and never intend to. Nice place to visit, but living in a city? Ugh. Horrible.
She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
Safety1 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 30 posts, RR: 0 Reply 24, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1001 times:
Being an ex-Londoner myself The City of London only has about 8000 residents, most of who live in the Barbican or surrounding area, I used to be one of the few. However about 250,000 people actually work in the City during the day!!.
Safety1
25 Scotty: You must have a small penthouse flat then? Or alternatively a very large bank balance, a villa in St. Tropez and a castle in Wales, having sold the sm
26 Safety1: Scotty Thats why I moved down here to Sussex, too small a bank balance, too small a flat, cost more per month in rent to live there, than my current m