747-600X From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2742 posts, RR: 17 Posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2476 times:
All you HTML gurus out there, this one should be pretty simple.
Working with frames, there's a NORESIZE tag which, obviously, prevents readers from resizing the frame. I'm not using that tag, but the frame is non-resizable anyway, it just sits there at the predefined height. So, is there an "ALLOWRESIZE" tag or something similar? It seems like without NORESIZE it should be resizable, but it's just not...???
Thanks!
"Mental health is reality at all cost." -- M. Scott Peck, 'The Road Less Traveled'
747-600X From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2742 posts, RR: 17 Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2453 times:
I guess I'm getting a bit confused with the BORDER, FRAMEBORDER tags. In the FRAMESET tag you can use BORDER and FRAMEBORDER, and I was under the impression that both were necessary so that Internet Explorer and Netscape could read it. But then, what's the purpose of putting them in the FRAME tag itself?
"Mental health is reality at all cost." -- M. Scott Peck, 'The Road Less Traveled'
Joge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1441 posts, RR: 48 Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2449 times:
From HTML 4.01 Reference:
Frameborder: Specifies whether or not to display border around the frame
This can have values 0 and 1 (hidden or visible).
I suppose that BORDER is what you need to solve your issue. I also suggest you remove all the extra attributes. The only ones you'll actually need are COLS in FRAMESET tag for vertical frameset (border should be visible by a default) and SRC in the FRAME tags.
747-600X From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2742 posts, RR: 17 Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2446 times:
Thanks! I've got it working now.
What's the word for someone from Finland? Fin? Finnish? Finacin?
"Mental health is reality at all cost." -- M. Scott Peck, 'The Road Less Traveled'
747-600X From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2742 posts, RR: 17 Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2437 times:
Hey, don't hit me, but - I'm (as you may have guessed) reading out of a book here, and it says that to get a framed page to link to an entirely new page - replacing your frames and all, the TARGET value should read "_TOP". It also says that "_WINDOW" opens your target in a new window. Unfortunately, they're both doing that. Is there a new HTML value in place of "_TOP" for replacing everything in the current window?
Thanks again... *sssigh*...
"Mental health is reality at all cost." -- M. Scott Peck, 'The Road Less Traveled'
NoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7796 posts, RR: 13 Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2432 times:
target = "_top" should replace the frameset not open a new window. To open a new window, the target is usually called "_blank" but any other name (as long it is not already used) oes it as well.
It's, however a good idea to stick to the terms, used by most developers.
747-600X From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2742 posts, RR: 17 Reply 8, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2430 times:
It was a "case" of case-sensitivity. I was using "_TOP" rather than "_top". Gotat' watch that, I guess!
"Mental health is reality at all cost." -- M. Scott Peck, 'The Road Less Traveled'
Mikey711MN From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1380 posts, RR: 8 Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2421 times:
Now if I may be the first one to mention this, but shame on you for using frames! They are the devil's work.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2742 posts, 
From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1441 posts, 
From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7796 posts, 
They are the devil's work.
Printer friendly format 
