Klaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21521 posts, RR: 53 Posted (10 years 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1587 times:
German ambassador to the US Wolfgang Ischinger has written an interesting article in the Atlantic Times about the perspectives of the transatlantic relationship. I think it should get attention on both sides of the pond.
Excerpt: [...] In my personal view, one of the significant perception problems in the transatlantic arena over the last several years has been the impression that America is constantly pushing forward, demanding action, trying to solve problems without delay, whereas Europeans are seen as being defensive, arguing either in favor of non-action or of delayed action, and neither willing nor capable of joining the United States in transforming the world into a better place.
This perception, the best intellectual expression of which is Robert Kagan’s essay on “Paradise and Power,” are false and misleading. As we strive to establish a new and more harmonious balance, perceptions of a driving and driven America, and of a reluctant or unwilling Europe, need to be reexamined and adjusted.
First, the concept of transformation is not a patent owned by America. Americans often forget or ignore the fact that there is no region in the world which equals the countries of Central and Eastern Europe in their capacity, determination, and success in transforming themselves from repressed societies into free democracies, and from state-planned economies into full participants in the global market place. More importantly, Europeans discovered the significance of working with the countries of the Middle East toward the goals of modernization, democracy, human rights , and the rule of law a long time ago - long before Washington got into that game.[...]
DL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1531 times:
First, the concept of transformation is not a patent owned by America. Americans often forget or ignore the fact that there is no region in the world which equals the countries of Central and Eastern Europe in their capacity, determination, and success in transforming themselves from repressed societies into free democracies, and from state-planned economies into full participants in the global market place.
The gentleman is correct, Central and Eastern Europe have proven themselves capable of transformation.
.....What was the catalyst for this transformation?
How did Europe manage to effect this transformation? Were the factors involved totally self-contained?
How long did it take these countries to realize a successful graduation to democracy?
Europe does have an agenda, I also think that it's agenda reads differently depending on the language in which it is being written and read.
Qb001 From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2053 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1522 times:
I agree with 90% of the article.
As for the remaining 10%, I have to take side with Americans sometimes, when they express the view that many countries (Europe and Canada, among others) don't do their fair share in terms of policing the world. Of course, the Iraq war has nothing to do with policing the world - it's an illegal invasion which goal seems to be to control the oil.
In today's Europe, would the EU be able and willing to successfully intervene in former Yugoslavia and succeed without the help and support of the USA, like in the early 90s ? I still have my doubts about that. France is doing a great job in Ivory Coast, but what about Liberia ? And Darfour ?
The world needs a stronger Europe, economically (done), politically (still too weak) and militarily (very, very weak).
Never let the facts get in the way of a good theory.
Boeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1469 times:
I think the bigger issue is actually France, which could actually implode on them, when it comes to Europe. While the US and Europe disagree on some issues right now, I see France as going overboard a bit. First they want to push their agenda the EU nations, and on an issue near and dear to A.netters then they tried to backdoor Germany's CEO partnership with EADS. Over here, we view these kinds of moves on the same level of arrogance that France views us with regard to the war.
what about Liberia ? And Darfour ?
That's a whole other mess.
Bottom line, the EU is much like the transformation of US States to a single nation. That didn't happen overnight, hell we had a civil war in the process. Some folks over there do need to tone down their politcal pushing and shoving for it to work.
MD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14139 posts, RR: 63
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1447 times:
AFAIK, any UN move into Sudan has been blocked in the security council by the vetos of Russia and China, who see it the legitimate right of a Nation´s government to terminate dissident parts of the population as "internal affairs, which are no business of anybody outside". For them territorial integrity is a priority before anything else, and don´t forget that, beyond the ethnical level in Sudan (Black Christians/Animists versus Arab Muslims) the whole thing is also bout oil (the Sudanese oil fields lie in the predominantly Animist/Christian region, but the Arab/Muslim government wants to exploit them). For a solution we´ve got to get rid of the right to veto for the 5 permanent members of the WSC, which I can´t see them giving up voluntarely.
Spinzels From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 days ago) and read 1425 times:
While the US and Europe disagree on some issues right now, I see France as going overboard a bit. First they want to push their agenda the EU nations,
Can you give a single example of this pushing?
In fact, they're not doing any pushing. On the major issues preoccupying Europe: Nukes in Iran, the Chinese Weapon Embargo, Israel/Palestine, Kyoto, the European position is much closer to the French one than the American one. Yes, I think a lot of people view the French as being a little too antagonistic, but that is style; on substance the French aren't pushing, the U.S. policies are deeply unpopular.
If France and Chirac were so disliked in Europe, Chirac wouldn't be so widely used as a spokesman advocating for passage of the new constitution. As it is, he is the number one public figure for passage of the new constitution.
True when you go beyond the original 15, you may find more opposition to France and more empathy for the American position. However, as Nick Kristof's excellent recent series in the Times show, ("Brother Can you Spare a Brigade") that empathy doesn't translate into actual support.
and on an issue near and dear to A.netters then they tried to backdoor Germany's CEO partnership with EADS.
Spinzels From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1323 times:
You're 0/2. I ask for explanations and you give me the results of your Google searches. And as a special Christmas bonus, none of the first few articles returned in either of the Google searches readily support your assertions.
GKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24964 posts, RR: 56
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1317 times:
I understand the EU want to co-operate more closely with China in a bid to try to become equal to the US.
I feel that if the EU progress down this path, then the divide between the EU and US will become much larger, and much more dangerous.
When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
Stratofish From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1055 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (10 years 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1256 times:
"Falcon84, dont worry, the EU have 2 equivalents of Bush, Jacques Chirac and that German guy - wanting to control the whole of Europe
Well, on a more serious note, that coming from a Bri...exc.me.. Scot is troubling. The only reason why Europe isn't formed in a way that fits you more is because your puppy of Bush doesn't really care about Europe, which is a shame if you ask me, because I sometimes prefer the British ideas/ways over the French or even German ones.
From the article above: "This perception, the best intellectual expression of which is Robert Kagan’s essay on “Paradise and Power...”
I happen to have read this imperialistic and fascist peace of cr@p. It was an irresponsible act to publish a piece of sh** of such a mad man, it's full of wrong exertations, wrong views and even wrong metaphors.
Kagan fits nicely in line with Max Weber and Josef Goebbels.
But then again, we must work on a more mature, trans-atlantic relationship, no doubt. But lets be honest: chances are slim.
Btw, I think Bush should definately NOT visit Germany next year! Let Condie come first and see.
Gary2880 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 5 days ago) and read 1249 times:
...care to refresh us as to exactly what was illegal about it?
what was legal about it?? you invaded another country without being attacked yourselfs, it was called the geniva convention im not sure if many americans are familiar with it, untill one of your own is captured (dont spout 9/11 crap to me we all know it had nothing to do with saddam) maybe if you hadnt trained and armed binladen in the first place it wouldnt have happend. you invaded iraq so that you wouldnt have to fight people in your own country, very cowardis, did anyone ask you to invade iraq? did it need invadeing? are you planning on invadeing scotland for our northsea oil? if its such america was only conserned for the peace of the world why not help the poor people in the sudan? why not just let saddam get on with it and send your hundreds of thousands of dollars to help the tens of thousands starving in africa?
another thing that amused me was when the news networks went on about it being legal to assassinate saddam because he was in charge of the army... so obviousley you wouldnt want one rule for someone and another rule for yourselfs would you, so i guess it must be 110% legal to assassinate bush, being commander in cheif and everything. i wish.
Pilotaydin From Turkey, joined Sep 2004, 2539 posts, RR: 51
Reply 19, posted (10 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1213 times:
the people really suffering are americans...they travel to Europe less now, they def travel less to Asia and Africa, and if i said they travel less to Middle east, people would post about how this place is a shit hole....well that "shit hole" is my home....
americans will travel less to Europe, ties will reduce, economies will suffer and they will become like indigenous people in north america, bc u cant tell me that an american can go backpaking freely in the world with a large US flag on their backs without getting it or being killed....
the poor tax payers, get it right back at them from the rest of the world. Gary2880 has valid points...
The only time there is too much fuel onboard, is when you're on fire!
Foxiboy From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 208 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (10 years 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1180 times:
maybe gary has got some good pionts ,however i feel that it was good that saddam was removed that can only be a good thing for the iraqi people,as for oil i dont think any country should be attacked for natural resources,but what saddam was putting his people through was pure evil.
How do i know this well a few years ago i operated some flight on behalf of the UN evacuating iraqi kurds to the US via GUAM and to see that was heart breaking kids on thier own as their parents had been killed cos they did not agree with old MR SADDAM and the one thing i will never get over as long as i live was the 12 month old baby travelling with a UN nurse he was the size of a 6 month old and his mum,dad,2 sisters,brother, grand parents and aunt had all been shot as an example to rest of the population of his town to toe the saddam line or face the same,and the 14 year old girl who lost her parents then was raped by iraqi soldiers for fun.
Now can anyone tell me saddam should still be in charge of iraq,and he would not have gone without force nor would his evil sons.
EZEIZA From Argentina, joined Aug 2004, 4968 posts, RR: 25
Reply 21, posted (10 years 12 hours ago) and read 1124 times:
Saddam is not a saint and the world would probably be safer without him. I say "would" because the problem is that the world still has to deal with another mass murderer who became president without being elected.