Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Going Too Far--Where Do You Draw The Line?  
User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8507 posts, RR: 12
Posted (9 years 7 months 3 days ago) and read 1587 times:

I think this would be a good example of stepping over the line. I'm not a huge fan of Condi anymore, although I do respect her and her achievements, but this is taking it way too far. Anyone else see this in their paper last Saturday?


http://www.ucomics.com/boondocks/2005/01/15/


Sometimes I wonder about society's declining sense of decency...


[Edited 2005-01-23 09:44:53]

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSLC1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1576 times:

I've read that comic and I have to say that it was a bit odd...not the usual material from McGruder. I can't say that it offended me, I just don't get what it was trying to say.

As for Affirmative Action, that's a difficult issue because it's truly irreconcilable. I used to be firmly against it (despite the fact that I'm pretty liberal), then for it, now I straddle the fence.


User currently offlineFlybyguy From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 1801 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1567 times:

The boondock author seems to be a very bitter person. I don't care much for his relentless sarcasm.


"Are you a pretender... or a thoroughbred?!" - Professor Matt Miller
User currently offlineSLC1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1560 times:

Flybyguy, It does get a bit nauseating.

User currently offlineUAL777CONTRAIL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1548 times:

His comics are lame,IMO.

As far as affirmative action goes? I am 90% against it. I don't agree with it, you hold back to many good people to get a person of color or a women in a position where it could have been filled with a person who earned it.

Then again, and now the 10% is concerned. You get new views and fresh blood in the position.

UAL 777 CONTRAIL


User currently offlineSLC1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1543 times:

I believe that not only should affirmative action take into account color/ethnicity, but also socioeconomic status, political views, gender, ability/disability, geographic region, (gasp!) sexual orientation, religion, national origin, etc, and on a limited scale.

User currently offlineAir2gxs From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1524 times:

Affirmative action is racial and gender discrimination. No matter how you try to paint it by saying you are trying to correct past discrimination and in-justices, affirmative action is discrimination.

User currently offlineSLC1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1516 times:

Air2gxs, it is discrimination, but is all discrimination inherently a bad thing?

User currently offlineAir2gxs From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1507 times:

All discrimination a bad thing? No, I would certainly discriminate against a convicted child molester baby-sitting my little girl.

But we're not talking about that kind of discrimination, are we? We are saying that someone who is more qualified for a position passed over in favor of someone who, though qualified, is not as qualified. All because of some protected status. That is wrong. It is also unfair, to both groups.

With affirmative action we are telling protected groups that they don't have to be as good as the other group, only good enough to be considered and the quotas will take care of the rest. I'm sorry, but that would offends the hell out me.

Affirmative action was probably necessary in the civil rights era to balance the playing field. But, here we are 50 or so years later and we are still telling groups that they are not good enough to compete at the higher levels, so we'll give you a leg up. President Bush said that "...our country must abandon all the habits of racism, because we cannot carry the message of freedom and the baggage of bigotry at the same time." Affirmative action is a habit of racism (and sexism). There is no systematic racism in the US anymore. We have had several laws on our books since the 50's that abolished those practices (and created affirmative action). But, I believe racism does exist as a habit in many parts of this country and affirmative action just fuels those habits and makes it difficult to shed the habit.

A person discriminated against because of affirmative action would surely harbor some dis-like or even hate for the protected group. That is one of the ways of making a racist; tell someone he did not get a position because, even though he was good enough for the job, he was not a member of a protected group and the person that got the job was a member and less qualified. How is that person supposed to feel? The seeds of racism are planted.


User currently offlineSLC1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1504 times:

btw...Quotas were struck down by Gratz v. Bollinger

And I don't agree with a less qualified person being favored over a more qualified person, but I do think that factors of diversity (not just racial) and overcoming true disadvantage (not just racial, actually mostly not racial) should be taken into account when weighing candidates within a reasonable margin of similar qualifications. Like I said, I'm strattling the fence. As for the question I posed, I'm not sure of the answer to it myself.


User currently offlineAerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7184 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1500 times:

It is a biological thing to differentiate differences in our environment - we are programmed to find them as a survival skill, and so discrimination of differences is an inherently human trait. However, As I live in a racially divided country I feel that it is not a good idea to have 'Affirmative Action' as it does provoke hostility/resentment and a real 'Them and us' mentality which is not good in a supposedly democratic country. We are all in the same boat, so we must all have the same rules.

As far as taking something too far, We take ourselves far too seriously. You have to be able to laugh at yourself as well as at others. Most cases of 'Going too far' occur when one or other party cannot see themselves or others in a humourous light. I noted several comments about tasteless & insensitive jokes in GKirks post with religious jokes. If you worry about that kind of thing you build up unnecessary stress in your life and it can manifest itself in other parts of your life.

Just my thoughts,


User currently offlineSLC1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1499 times:

Aerorob,

That "us and them" mentality is precisely one of the reasons why "Affirmative Action" must be abolished to be replaced by something that considers a broad spectrum of factors.


User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4124 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

I believe that not only should affirmative action take into account color/ethnicity, but also socioeconomic status, political views, gender, ability/disability, geographic region, (gasp!) sexual orientation, religion, national origin, etc, and on a limited scale.

I believe that race/ethnicity should not be a factor at all. If anything, only socioeconomic class should be the factor. That way, the poor white, black, asian, and hispanic applicant can be considered on their income.

Why should a hispanic or black applicant from a wealthy family (and we know there are those) benefit, while a poor white or asian student (and there are those too) suffer because of what happened in the past?

So put me down as being vehemently against Affirmative Action.



"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Being Unfaithful - Where Do You Cross The Line? posted Tue Mar 16 2004 13:59:15 by Saintsman
Choclo: Where Do You Find It In The US? posted Tue Jan 18 2005 00:13:13 by MaverickM11
Proper Clubbing In The UK - Where Do You Go? posted Wed Mar 31 2004 20:04:26 by CHRISBA777ER
Where Do You Live In The UK? posted Sun Feb 1 2004 20:41:16 by Pe@rson
Do You Play The Lottery? posted Tue Aug 8 2006 07:22:50 by FXramper
How Do You Pronounce The Word 'livery' posted Fri Jul 7 2006 21:22:35 by SFOerik
How Do You Find The License Number In Program? posted Mon Jul 3 2006 19:55:34 by RootsAir
Skiing, Where Do You Go? posted Sat Jul 1 2006 19:44:48 by BA787
How Do You Cook The Perfect Steak? posted Mon Mar 6 2006 21:30:15 by Saintsman
Where're You Spending The Holidays? posted Fri Dec 23 2005 01:55:37 by KiwiNanday