SKYSERVICE_330 From Canada, joined Sep 2000, 1438 posts, RR: 5 Posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1100 times:
So, it has been established that Sponge Bob is apparently gay and allowing kids to watch him spreads the "evil gay doctrine" ... well atleast according to our friends on the right. Seems though the next evil homo spreading agenda is 'No-Name Calling Week' which supposedly spreads homosexuality as well.
“No Name-calling Week” takes aim at insults of all kinds — whether based on a child’s appearance, background or behavior. But a handful of conservative critics have zeroed in on the references to harassment based on sexual orientation.
“I hope schools will realize it’s less an exercise in tolerance than a platform for liberal groups to promote their pan-sexual agenda,” said Robert Knight, director of Concerned Women for America’s Culture and Family Institute. http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6858602/
I am not ignorant to the fact that this is only a small portion of the political right (thank goodness) but these crusades against gays are just getting laughable anymore.
MaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17998 posts, RR: 46
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1079 times:
What on earth is the "pan sexual agenda"? If all of those people in the Republican party that whine about a "gay agenda" could be separated from the party and marooned on an island, I'd register as a Republican in an instant. But until then I'll just have to continue to secretly convert kindergarteners to homosexuality...
ConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1063 times:
I'd register as a Republican in an instant
...I thought you were?
You see, social conservatives of the James Dobson
Don't even get me started on that quack..
..and what's so sickening is that the bile-spewwing hatemonger knows damn well how to post this kindly grandfather-next-door such that no one sees him for what he truly is.
"I have nothing against homosexuals, I love them as my brothers and sisters just like God commanded".... yet somehow, he always manages to omit the remainder of his agenda (YES, agenda), being: I just don't want them to have social relationships, sexual relationships, committed partnerships, recognition by any form of media or congreggation, and sure as hell not any interaction with children.
Lehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 985 times:
Do any regular folk see through this...uh...to me it appears to be an insecurity on behalf of those with such conviction that not only do they not regard themselves as extremists or fundamentalists, but that they would probably claim to be have been the choosen ones as they claim they are the only one's speaking up about it. Cuz see only those really in the shit can see the shit, so to speak.
I'm speechless; obviously with our current voting population, we cannot remove the hyperconservatives unless we are willing to take in a hyperliberal.
Cuz see minority rules 'n stuff...pick your poison.
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
Matt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 45
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 959 times:
So he's gay. Big deal. I grew up watching Bugs Bunny kissing Elmer Fudd, both of whom spent numerous episodes dressed in drag. I didn't think anything of it. I didn't turn out gay. I enjoyed those cartoons as a kid, and I still enjoy them as a 31 year old adult. Why, in some 50 or 60 years on the air, has anyone complained about those cartoons?
Even I know that there should be bigger fish to fry.