Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Children's Freedom Of Religion?  
User currently offlineL.1011 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2209 posts, RR: 9
Posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2025 times:

After hearing stories of children dying because their parents were Christian Science and their silly belief against modern medicine prevented them from being treated for leukemia or whatever, I must pose a question. Do you feel children do or should have a legal basis to refuse and rebel against the religious beliefs of their parents? For example, getting an injunction to recieve medical treatment against their parents wishes? Should there be a cutoff age here? Should other family members have the right to act on the behalf a child too young to realize what is going on? Do children have the right to abandon the religious beliefs their parents raised them with? If so, is there a cutoff age? What are your thoughts on the rights of parents and children related to religion?

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2012 times:

I think using the wackos that let their kids die with no treatment completely skews the question you pose. Its almost like comparing the question of kids rebelling against a healthy diet vs. rebeling against being neglected and malnourished. One is no, one is yes.


"Shaddap you!"
User currently offlineAirlinerfreak From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2008 times:

Personally I do not think children should be born into a religion. I think they should be able to choose at a later age. But I do not think they should be punished nor should adults. But unfortunatly, the world would be no fun if everyone was treated the same and was the same.

User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 30
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1996 times:

Quoting Airlinerfreak (reply 2):
Personally I do not think children should be born into a religion. I think they should be able to choose at a later age.


Sounds fun. Just like going shopping.  sarcastic 

Why in the world does the government have to get involved in this, and probably screw it up somehow? Stay out of family life and don't legislate what choices parents can make for their children. I'm sick of people going off on anything religious as a violation of separation of church and state, and then suggesting interfering with how families practice their own religion. If a child is being harmed, such as the above case, appropriate legal action should be followed, but because of the well being of the child, not the religious reason for it.

Harry



Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineL.1011 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2209 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1961 times:

Quoting JetService (reply 1):
I think using the wackos that let their kids die with no treatment completely skews the question you pose.


And yet their "right" to impose their religious beliefs on their children still stands.

Quoting Airlinerfreak (reply 2):
Personally I do not think children should be born into a religion. I think they should be able to choose at a later age.


I personally find that's a little extreme. But I feel that the current situation is excessively biased. I was born and raised Roman Catholic. A few years ago, I realized I found most of their beliefs ridiculous and abandoned it for Deism. My mom (who is the Catholic) isn't too happy. My dad (who is technically Lutheran but really doesn't give a crap; I'd call him an Agnostic) didn't really care. For a couple years, before I decided to tell my parents, I struggled with feelings of guilt and fear from the indoctrination and dogma of a religion I didn't believe in. All because my mom decided, without having a clue of my personal beliefs, what my beliefs would be. I love my mom, but she and other parents are wrong on this.

Quoting Newark777 (reply 3):
Stay out of family life and don't legislate what choices parents can make for their children.


Quoting Newark777 (reply 3):
and then suggesting interfering with how families practice their own religion.


Why should parents be able to make decisions for their children? You're a Republican, you should be an advocate of personal freedom. The fact is that parents forcing children to maintain a certain religious belief and telling them that everyone who isn't a member of religion xyz is wrong, is not personal freedom. Although it is not a ban on an act, is the subconcious coercion against an act.

Quoting Newark777 (reply 3):
I'm sick of people going off on anything religious as a violation of separation of church and state,


Who said that?


User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 30
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1957 times:

Quoting L.1011 (reply 4):
Why should parents be able to make decisions for their children?


Because they are the parents, and the kids are free to make up their own mind when they are adults. I'm a pretty strong Catholic, and education about religion begins at a fairly young age. Wait for them to be adults, and you miss most of the sacraments and almost twenty years of their lives. It is the responsibility of the parents to make decisions that are in the best interest of their children, and if that means practicing religion, so be it.


Quoting L.1011 (reply 4):
Who said that?


Not you or anyone else in this thread. I was saying it in a general sense, regarding many issues in the news in the recent past.

Harry



Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineSprout5199 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1849 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

Religion is fine to a point. When a child may die then it is child abuse. Would anybody let me beat my child becuase it is part of my religious beliefs? So why should we as a nation look the other way because of religion?


Dan in Jupiter


User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 30
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1953 times:

Quoting Sprout5199 (reply 6):
When a child may die then it is child abuse. Would anybody let me beat my child becuase it is part of my religious beliefs? So why should we as a nation look the other way because of religion?


We shouldn't, and I don't think we have. Most of these cases have resulted in the children going to relatives or foster care, and the parents going to jail, where they belong. There is a difference between making your kids going to church every week and starving them. The line is crossed when the well being over the child is threatened in any way, and this is when the authorities should step in and stop what is going on.

Harry



Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13005 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1948 times:

There has been numerous cases in the USA of conflicts with medical needs of the minor children of Christ. Scientists, other such religious groups and naturalist nutcases. In some cases, the doctors took the responsibilty from the parents in fear of legal liability if they died. Such doctors are caught in a tough place as the parents have control, but so too does the government if the parents will not be responsible for their child.

User currently offlineSLC1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1941 times:

I think it is just fine for parents to have their children follow certain religious beliefs, because, well, what are you going to do? I just think it is important that children also learn at an age appropriate level what belief systems exist outside their religion and there are alternative means of thought. I was raised mormon, by mormon parents, and never felt mormonism, or religion in general was for me, however I wonder if I had never been exposed to anything else (as many mormons aren't) if I would still be mormon, nah on second thought, I wouldn't be.

Edit: thought

[Edited 2005-03-04 04:41:16]

User currently offlineUAL747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1939 times:

Children have no freedom of relgion. They are not cognitively capable of understanding even some of the most fundamental facets of organized religious philosophy. Even during adolescence and early adulthood, they truly lack the abilites to analyze, question, and formulate "faith".

Once, in Church, our pastor said, "As parents, it is your duty to make sure that your children get to heaven." That mentality causes children to be the products of their parents beliefs, accepting what is said blindly.

UAL


User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1901 times:

Quoting L.1011 (reply 0):
For example, getting an injunction to recieve medical treatment against their parents wishes?


Simple answer - Child Endangerment legislation. Any parent denying reasonable medical treatment to their child should be locked up and have the child taken into care.

Of course in countries without socialised medicine, the issue of money comes into it, which makes it more difficult. But deliberately denying available medical care to a sick child needs to be a crime.


User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 849 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1897 times:

Why are americans so obsessed w religious questions? Is it ´cuz US is a melting pot of religions?
I´m curius to know. Personly I have no identity crise w religion: I dont belive in it!!

Thx!

Micke//SE  Confused



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineAerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7120 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

Quoting JGPH1A (reply 11):

Simple answer - Child Endangerment legislation. Any parent denying reasonable medical treatment to their child should be locked up and have the child taken into care.

Absolutely. To do this is easily as equally undesirable as Abortion, yet this is ok but Abortion is not in the eyes of these few.

Quoting UAL747 (reply 10):
Children have no freedom of relgion. They are not cognitively capable of understanding even some of the most fundamental facets of organized religious philosophy.".

Totally Correct, which is why If the consequences of witholding due care on a minor will cause death/severe disability, their parent's power of attorney should be automatically overriden by medical professionals and the parents charged with abuse/neglect/attempted murder/assisting suicide etc. If as an adult you want to die rather than have a tranfusion or whatever that's fine, it's your decision to make but to refuse your child adequate healthcare because of your religious beliefs is no better than a Fundamentalist Muslim parent that wants to blow their child up as a martyr for their faith.


User currently offlineGkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24899 posts, RR: 56
Reply 14, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1880 times:

Religion is the true form of hatred/terrorism in the world. Somebody that won't let their sick child get treated purely because of their religious ways, are truly sick minded and should never have become a parent in the beginning


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineL.1011 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2209 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1877 times:

Quoting Solnabo (reply 12):
Why are americans so obsessed w religious questions? Is it ´cuz US is a melting pot of religions?
I´m curius to know. Personly I have no identity crise w religion: I dont belive in it!!


I'd say that indeed it would be our religious diversity. Even though America is technically 75% or so Christian, we're 25% Catholic and 50% Protestant, and rather than one Protestant group, there are dozens, with no one dominant group. Many of those people don't believe anything close to the full slate of their religion's beliefs. Then there are about 10% of people who are Atheists, or part of one of the Freethinking religions. Then you have the Jewish and Muslim groups. Buddhism is growing, and just about every religious group in the world is represented in the United States.


User currently offlineJetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1870 times:

Quoting Gkirk (reply 14):
Religion is the true form of hatred/terrorism in the world.


I disagree. I'd say politics is.



Quoting Gkirk (reply 14):
Somebody that won't let their sick child get treated purely because of their religious ways, are truly sick minded and should never have become a parent in the beginning


If you ask me, denying medical care for your child for any reason is pretty sick.



"Shaddap you!"
User currently offlineGkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24899 posts, RR: 56
Reply 17, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1868 times:

JetService, you make good points. But IMO, religion is worse than politics


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineAir2gxs From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1861 times:

I grew up Greek Orthodox. I knew of no other religion until I was about 6 and went to the hospital for an injury. I was asked my religion and my father answered for me after a blank stare from me.

Later that day, my father sat with me and explained that there are multiple religions, all believing different things. Some are very similar and some are very different. He told me that soon, I would start thinking about religion and eventually may choose to go away from our Church. But, it was my choice.

That's how we're raising our daughter. She is being raised as a Roman Catholic, but will be exposed to other religions as she gets older. She will learn of Christianity, Islam, Judaism and any other religion she wants to learn about. Of course, we will stress Christianity, but the decision will be her's, when she reaches the appropiate age.

We're trying to raise a rational person who can contribute to society in ways other than just paying taxes and existing. We want her to think for herself and make decisions for herself, not take our biases as her own.

But, make no mistake, until she is old enough to take the information, process it, and come up with a decision, she is subject to our rules and lifestyle. We have chosen Roman Catholisim, and she is being raised as such. We are conservatives, and she is being raised as such. We are hard working, and she is being raised to appreciate and understand work ethic. We are compassionate, and she is being raised with compassion. so she can learn to be compassionate. But, when she's older she can change.


User currently offlineTACAA320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1857 times:

Quoting L.1011 (reply 0):
After hearing stories of children dying because their parents were Christian Science and their silly belief against modern medicine prevented them from being treated for leukemia or whatever, I must pose a question. Do you feel children do or should have a legal basis to refuse and rebel against the religious beliefs of their parents?



I think that there is something wrong. One thing is the right to "choose a religion", that I personally think belongs to adults only[when you get your majority, 18, 21] and the right to live or to have full access to "health and medical services" that belong to every single person.

You may raise a child as a Baptist, Lutheran, Muslin... and when he/she grow up, he/she will take his/her own decision about religion.

I see the same problem with the Jehova's Witnesses, that don't allow any blood transfusion, no matter if they are minors or adults.


User currently offlineCsavel From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1362 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1845 times:

I think the rule should be
"Does the parents' religious beliefs mean a permanent change in the child that canot be changed back when the child is of age."

I mean the parents could be Bible Belters but the kid could grow up and rebel. or vice versa. You could force a kid to go to church every Sunday but if he doesn't want to as an adult, well that's that. But if the parents refuse medical treatment because of their religious beliefs and the kid dies, well the line is crossed. The child is harmed permanantly (obviously) and no amount of rebellion is going to change that.

PS at the risk of starting a flame war, I must say as a nice Jewish boy that circumcions is one of the things that would be prohibited. If a kid wants to make is winkie kosher when he is of age, go right ahead, but since even a rebel can't undo the loss of his foreskin, it should be illegal. And let's not even get into female genital mutilation.



I may be ugly. I may be an American. But don't call me an ugly American.
User currently offlineDuke From Canada, joined Sep 1999, 1155 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1791 times:

I think it's ridiculous to say that someone can't understand religion before they're 18. I was an atheist until 12, then started to believe in Orthodox Christianity OF MY OWN FREE WILL. I am still an Orthodox Christian today at 25.

User currently offlineTACAA320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

Quoting Duke (reply 21):
I think it's ridiculous to say that someone can't understand religion before they're 18.




Is not ridiculous, is not the average.


User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 53
Reply 23, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1766 times:

Quoting Duke (reply 21):
I think it's ridiculous to say that someone can't understand religion before they're 18.


I agree totally, having undergone a switch from Judaism to atheism during my childhood...

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineTACAA320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1740 times:

We must consider some aspects, before giving a general rule [not specific ones among hundreds].

http://rac.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=894&pge_prg_id=4368


25 Post contains links TACAA320 : Such right is shared with the parents. And as I said, I'm not talking about an specific case but in general. http://www.savethechildren.ca/en/whoweare
26 L.1011 : Why? Is switching religions going to impair their development as drinking would at an early age? Are they going to kill somebody with their new relig
27 L.1011 : TACA's link is (I presume) based on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Article 14: 1. States Parties shall respect the right of
28 TACAA320 : Because parents most of the time [not always] want the best for their children. They're simply older and wiser [not always again].
29 L.1011 : And how is following one religion or another "what's best"?
30 SLC1 : Well, in that case, it's not religion it's a cult that endangers children that should be illegal. Well, it certainly can be, God and Hell are pretty
31 Newark777 : That's for the parent to decide, not you. Harry
32 L.1011 : Why....
33 TACAA320 : Catholic parents decide to baptize their children[1]. Jews circumcises them[2]. And on and on. And they can ask later to get rid of the sacrament[1]
34 TACAA320 : Pls. read "can't" instead of "can". Sorry for the error.
35 Newark777 : So are you saying parents shouldn't baptize or circumcise, or the opposite? Harry
36 TACAA320 : Harry, What I am saying is that parents take such decisions [religious decision on behalf of their children], to support my thesis that the Children's
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
No Longer "Freedom Of Speech" In France :( posted Fri Oct 13 2006 23:53:48 by Wing
Freedom Of Speech posted Tue Feb 21 2006 00:13:10 by Vc10
Must We Give Up Freedom Of Speech? posted Sun Feb 12 2006 23:19:51 by Halls120
Stifling Freedom Of Speech Or Maintain Order? posted Tue Feb 7 2006 14:31:50 by ANCFlyer
Freedom Of Speech Vs Islam, The Dutch Experience. posted Mon Nov 8 2004 17:44:33 by DIJKKIJK
Disrespect Of Religion posted Wed Jun 9 2004 20:12:41 by Mdsh00
US And Freedom Of Speech posted Mon Mar 31 2003 22:18:23 by Derico
Freedom Of Speech Denied CT High School Students posted Fri Mar 21 2003 02:16:41 by STT757
Goodbye To Freedom Of Speech? posted Tue Mar 4 2003 13:04:20 by GDB
Freedom Of Speech posted Thu Sep 12 2002 23:39:03 by Lehpron