Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Zarqawi Aide Arrested In Iraq Is American  
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14132 posts, RR: 62
Posted (9 years 8 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1330 times:

A man arrested in Iraq for being an aide to Al Qaeda terrorist leader Al Zarqawi has been discovered to be a naturalised American citizen:

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...o_ca_st_pe/zarqawi_aide_captured_9

I wonder if they will get him for treason?

Jan

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1329 times:

Quoting MD11Engineer (Thread starter):
A man arrested in Iraq for being an aide to Al Qaeda terrorist leader Al Zarqawi has been discovered to be a naturalised American citizen:

Still a terrorist, still a threat, deserves no different treatment than any of the others. No sympathy. No quarter.

My question is, who has jurisdiction, the US or the Iraqi courts?


User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14132 posts, RR: 62
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1324 times:

CSM,

I just wonder if they would try him additionaly for high treason (like for example what happened to Joyce, "Lord Haw Haw", a British fascist who worked for the Germans in propaganda during WW2. He was hung for high treason after the war). After all, he has been taking part in endangering and killing American troops.
I don´t know what the federal punishment for high treason and cooperation with the enemy is, a US Army firing squad or the gallows?

Jan


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

The federal courts still have the death penalty. But the gallows is out I'm sure. Firing Squad or Lethal Injection.

As for whether he'd be tried in a US Federal Court, or Military Court (I can't see that), or Iraqi court remains to be seen.

His crimes were against the US and it's allies, however, they took place on Iraqi soil - and since Iraq is (supposedly) self governing now - or at least has a government a court system - they might wish to retain authority to try him. Either way, he will be dealt justice.

I'm not sure there is a "Status of Forces Agreement" in place as there is similarly between the US and Germany. I recall being told when I was living there to ensure I had my "SOFA" card when I ventured into the countryside. Should something untoward occur, I was to present it to the German Authorities and it obligated them to notify the US military of my situation. They would then decide who had jurisdiction. Most often the offender was turned over to the military for minor offenses. Major crimes were left to the hands of the German people.

Personally, I think since the crimes occured on Iraqi soil, the Iraqi Courts have the first "right of refusal" on the issue.


User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (9 years 8 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1306 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 1):
My question is, who has jurisdiction, the US or the Iraqi courts?

He had better hope it is a U.S. court. The Iraqis aren't going to treat foreign terrorists very well.

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 3):
The federal courts still have the death penalty. But the gallows is out I'm sure. Firing Squad or Lethal Injection.

In the federal system as well as the military, lethal injection is the method of capital punishment.



"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineRussophile From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 8 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1296 times:

Quoting B757300 (Reply 4):
The Iraqis aren't going to treat foreign terrorists very well.

Unless of course you are a member of Mujahedin-e-Khalq and then the Iraqi government (forced to do so by the US) rolls out the welcome mat. Which is quite surprising, seeing as the MKO directly assisted Saddam with the Kurdish slaughter.

Anyway, to the topic, 'rule of law' should dictate that any charges be laid against him in Iraq, and for those charges to be heard in an Iraqi court.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Seized Papers Said To Show Qaeda In Iraq Is Worrie posted Thu May 11 2006 06:23:16 by Jetjack74
RAF Officer Who Refused To Serve In Iraq Is Jailed posted Thu Apr 13 2006 23:08:40 by BMIFlyer
German Hostage In Iraq Is Free posted Sun Dec 18 2005 20:43:59 by Racko
What Is More Important In Iraq Than MS Or LA? posted Sat Sep 3 2005 03:16:13 by MD-90
Rep. Senator Hagel...US Is Losing In Iraq posted Mon Jun 20 2005 03:36:37 by Rsmith6621a
What Is The US Army Doing In Iraq? posted Sun Mar 6 2005 22:21:38 by Avianca
Beheading Of An American In Iraq. posted Tue May 11 2004 20:36:35 by Sabenapilot
Is It Really This Bad In Iraq? 8 US Dead Today? posted Fri Sep 19 2003 01:57:37 by Cedarjet
1 More Dead American In Iraq posted Fri Jul 4 2003 09:13:50 by Dc10guy
Democracy Is Impossible IN Iraq posted Mon Mar 31 2003 12:53:57 by HUS9746