Airlinelover From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 5580 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted
Fri Apr 22 2005 19:35:57 UTC (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1198 times:
Well, if you are really from Russia, that could explain it. (IIRC) Russia was NEVER really the good guys..
BUt what's the fuss? Three Simple Words...
Chris [Edited 2005-04-22 19:46:40]
Lets do some sexy math. We add you, subtract your clothes, divide your legs and multiply
FutureUALpilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2615 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted
Fri Apr 22 2005 19:40:21 UTC (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1195 times:
I don't worship him by any means but I do think he is cool...in a nutshell, he is the guy a lot of guys want to be. A man's man. He is good with the ladies, has a kick ass job, gets to travel the world, blow stuff up, shoot guns, be a spy, play with a bunch of awsome toys and gadgets. He is suave and debonare, charming to the ladies and witty in general yet a real arse-kicker. [Edited 2005-04-22 19:41:31]
Life is better when you surf.
Sabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted
Fri Apr 22 2005 19:44:52 UTC (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1187 times:
I love Bond movies because of many reasons, for example:
The toys he gets from Q
The not lame action scenes
Nighthawk From UK - Scotland, joined Sep 2001, 5270 posts, RR: 31
Reply 4, posted
Fri Apr 22 2005 19:47:31 UTC (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1184 times:
first off im not from russia, im scottish.
Second i dont see the appeal of band at all! The gadgets are all stupid and unrealistic, watches with lasers built it? Doubtful.
The attempts at comedy in bond films just make me cringe, its not funny at all, and the plots are just so predictable!
That'll teach you
Homer71 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2261 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted
Fri Apr 22 2005 19:56:45 UTC (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1178 times:
Quoting Nighthawk ( Reply 4): Second i dont see the appeal of band at all! The gadgets are all stupid and unrealistic, watches with lasers built it? Doubtful
In From Russia With Love (1963), Bond answered his phone that was installed in his Bentley, people back then thought that was a ridiculous concept - a car phone.
All the Bond movies provide is escapist fun, it doesn't need to be realistic and/or real world all the time.
I'll give you that, the more recent Bonds have been a little too over the top on their chases/gadgets. But, on the whole, the Bond series have been great, with the action, the women, ... the women...
"On spaceship earth there are no passengers...only crew."
LY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted
Fri Apr 22 2005 20:48:33 UTC (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1168 times:
Quoting Homer71 ( Reply 5): All the Bond movies provide is escapist fun, it doesn't need to be realistic and/or real world all the time
When it comes to Bond movies that is quite the understatement. Most of it borders on science fiction if you ask me. Even Top Gun, being one of Hollywood's worst attrocities, was more realistic.
Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
AeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20822 posts, RR: 61
Reply 7, posted
Fri Apr 22 2005 20:53:51 UTC (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1164 times:
It's all a matter of taste. I like the Bond movies (well, most of them), but don't understand the fuss over Star Trek at all, so I just don't watch it, and let those who do enjoy it, without dissecting why Trek doesn't flip my skirt.
International Homo of Mystery
CoRocks From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1216 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted
Sat Apr 23 2005 00:21:39 UTC (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1141 times:
Funny that I saw this topic, as I am watching 'Goldeneye' on USA Network right now.
I like the older 'movies' the best, as the gadgets and stories are starting to get a little ridiculous (invisable car). However, I really like Brosnan, and put him #2 behind Connery in my book.