Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CIA’s Final Report: No WMD Found In Iraq  
User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2256 times:

This came out yesterday. Surprised the media hasn't jumped all over this. Surprised nobody has jumped all over this. Sure, its already known, but it pretty much debunks the "they still might be out there" theory, the "we haven't searched everywhere" theory, etc. etc.

***

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/

WASHINGTON - In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

advertisement
“After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,” wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall.

“As matters now stand, the WMD investigation has gone as far as feasible.”


***

This report is pretty damning. Our reason for going to war was WMD. For six months this country was led to believe that we were under an immediate threat from Iraq's WMD. For six months the Bush Administration tried to convince the world that there were WMD's in Iraq.

This makes me so mad. Why are they not being held responsible? I don't buy the excuse that it was the CIA or FBI's fault, that it was bad intelligence. The responsibility goes all the way to the top, to the people who led us into this war. These people ordered our armed forces to fight a war to defend our country from WMD's, and now 1500 of our soldiers are dead and there are no WMD's.

If Clinton got impeached for lying about a blowjob under oath, why isn't Bush under fire for lying to the American people and the world? These lies have led to thousands of deaths and incredible destruction.


NO URLS in signature
82 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCaptOveur From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2254 times:

Old news is so exciting.

User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2248 times:

It is isn't it. And doesn't it make you mad?

If Bush lied to us, if he deliberately mislead us to go to war under the pretenses of WMD, doesn't that make you mad?

If Bush was just dumb, and believed false intelligence, doesn't that make you mad?

Why are 1,500 of our soldiers dead, for what? Why are so many Americans dead? The reason we went to war, and this cannot be denied, was WMD.

You just brush it aside as old news, but these are people's lives we're talking about.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineSchoenorama From Spain, joined Apr 2001, 2440 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

Quoting CaptOveur (Reply 1):
Old news is so exciting.

I guess you prefer more recent news about the latest attack on GI's in Iraq; GI's who actually believed Saddam had thousands of WMD's and was actually behind 911.



Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
User currently offlineCaptOveur From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

Quoting Tbar220 (Reply 2):
It is isn't it. And doesn't it make you mad?

Honestly I don't give a shit. We are there now, we need to deal with it and get out. Not like we can un-invade.


User currently offlineBiggles From Canada, joined Dec 2004, 459 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2237 times:

I will always remember Rummy's "They have WMD's , and we know exactly where there are" speech..  Yeah sure

User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2232 times:

Quoting CaptOveur (Reply 4):
Honestly I don't give a shit. We are there now, we need to deal with it and get out. Not like we can un-invade.

So it doesn't bother to you that we went to war on false pretenses, and we now have dead soldiers because of it? I won't try and convince you otherwise, but I just want to know.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21530 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2230 times:

Quoting Biggles (Reply 5):
I will always remember Rummy's "They have WMD's , and we know exactly where there are" speech..

Yup, they were in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad, and north, south, east and west somewhat. Weren't they?????????  confused 

So remind me, why did we go to war again? Oh, that's right, to free the Iraqi people. That's why Bush kept giving all these "Saddam has weapons and we must disarm him" speeches before the war started.  Yeah sure

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

In related news, the CIA has reportedly located a person that was surprised by this news...

In all honesty - is there really anyone who didn't see this coming? Including the "we didn't go to war because of the weapons" comments?



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2219 times:

The point is that we as Americans are lazy. We don't care that this administration lied to us about this war. Why do I say this? We reelected them.


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineCaptOveur From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2216 times:

Quoting Tbar220 (Reply 6):
So it doesn't bother to you that we went to war on false pretenses, and we now have dead soldiers because of it? I won't try and convince you otherwise, but I just want to know.

Hindsight is 20/20 There is nothing showing that anyone KNEW at the time of the invasion there were no WMDs. For there to be a LIE someone would have to KNOWINGLY mislead the nation. I am not convinced there was a lie.

It is a war, people die. We can't undo what we have done but if the people there want to make their country into a great nation we are enabling them. I am sorry those soldiers are gone but they were 100% aware of the risks when they signed on the dotted line. Death is an occupational hazard in the military.

Imagine all the bad decisions in the history of the world, or even in any of our lives that could be undone if we knew what the result would be. There was actually a pretty interesting episode of Star Trek that addressed this exact issue.

You are just looking for yet another thing about Bush to bitch about.


User currently offlineAA777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2544 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2217 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Tbar220 (Reply 9):
The point is that we as Americans are lazy. We don't care that this administration lied to us about this war. Why do I say this? We reelected them.

Leave it to the conservatives to cover Bush's arse! WHO CARES THAT ALMOST 2000 AMERICANS HAVE DIED? What about the 100,000 + Iraqis that died?

Here's my take: Bush KNEW there was no WMD. It is ALL about power politics, including oil and American influence in the region. It infurites me, but hey, I could have told you all this 2 years ago.

-AA777


User currently offlineNonRevKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2210 times:

Quoting CaptOveur (Reply 4):
Honestly I don't give a shit.

If it was Clinton or any other Democrat, you would.


User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2206 times:

Quoting CaptOveur (Reply 10):
You are just looking for yet another thing about Bush to bitch about.

I read your post with interest until I got to that line. Come on, did you have to put that in? You do not know my political affiliation, you don't even know what kind of person I am or how I voice my opinions. So how can you make a generalization like that? Moving right along...

I suppose what I'm thinking is that lie, misinformation, etc. Whatever it was that got us into this war, people need to be held accountable. I agree that death is a risk of joining the army, but when our soldiers are sent to an unjustified war by people high up, those high up people should be held responsible.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineTurtle From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 206 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2202 times:

Speaking of Clinton and any other Democrat, they too believed that WMD's were in Iraq.

User currently offlineNonRevKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2192 times:

Quoting Turtle (Reply 14):
Speaking of Clinton and any other Democrat, they too believed that WMD's were in Iraq.

But the responsibility for this "oopsy" is on Bush. Where is your outrage now?

B


User currently offlineIakobos From Belgium, joined Aug 2003, 3312 posts, RR: 35
Reply 16, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2187 times:

Iraq was a target before 9/11.
This faithful date however hastened the implementation of the plans, the only questions raised were "what good reason to invoke", "how to guide US public opinion along the right path", and "when needed, what alternative reasons to use later on".

On the one hand, they knew the UN would not condone an attack, they knew France, Germany and others would stand in the way, they knew world opinion would generally be against the move, they knew they had to open their wallet to build up a so-called coalition, they knew the troops would be there for years not months, they reckoned justly that by the time the legitimacy of the "invasion" would have evaporated, the dust would have settled, hundreds of calendar pages been turned and the heath abated to standard ISO.

On the other hand they were certain they could count on the (yes, driven by fresh emotions and terribly uncritical) patriotism of their citizens in the aftermath of 9/11, find the money, vote the budgets, crush Saddam's dummy army, and have their feet and enterprises solidly planted in the Middle East.

Following the large-scale slandering of the UN, France and Germany, only to name those three, would anyone think that something along the lines of a "sorry" is due ?

Yes, they lied, nothing new under the sun when the leadership thinks that the ultimate motives are justified. (valid for every country's leadership of course)

You do not pay they to act as Cinderella but to lead the country.

If in business, the CEO lied to the shareholders what do you think would happen ?
Conclusion: in many aspects a political career is safer.


User currently offlineMt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6574 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2186 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Turtle (Reply 14):
Speaking of Clinton and any other Democrat, they too believed that WMD's were in Iraq.

Did they believe that they were and "imminent threat"?

Did they stand before the UN with a powerpoint presentation?

Did they act?



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2173 times:

Quoting CaptOveur (Reply 1):
Old news is so exciting.

Ditto, agreed.

Quoting Tbar220 (Reply 2):
Why are 1,500 of our soldiers dead, for what? Why are so many Americans dead? The reason we went to war, and this cannot be denied, was WMD.

You just brush it aside as old news, but these are people's lives we're talking about.

Not at all, I feel for the brothers and sisters in uniform that have paid the ultimate price. It's not that I brush it aside, it's that it's OLD news. And if YOU can't get past it, you have a problem. What needs to happen now, since we all know it's too damn late to change anything, is to get behind the soldiers that are still there (I didn't support the war, or Bush, or anything except the soldiers).

Quoting Biggles (Reply 5):
I will always remember Rummy's "They have WMD's , and we know exactly where there are" speech..

Dumsfeld should have been canned after Abu Ghraib. Check that: Dumsfeld should have been canned when he started preaching about doing this fight on the cheap with only two Divisions and a few Separate Brigades AND then FAILING miserably to have a plan in place after the "Combat Phase" of the operation. Dumsfeld is one of the worst things to happen to the DoD in a very long time. And I know - my office used to be 2E374 at the five sided funny farm. He should have listened to Gen Shinseki when he was told - repeatedly - "beware the 12 Division Strategy with a 10 Division Army". Alas, he did not. Loser.

Quoting Leskova (Reply 8):
In related news, the CIA has reportedly located a person that was surprised by this news

Duh . . .

Old news, lets move on.

[Edited 2005-04-27 02:08:46]

User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Reply 19, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2156 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 18):
Not at all, I feel for the brothers and sisters in uniform that have paid the ultimate price. It's not that I brush it aside, it's that it's OLD news. And if YOU can't get past it, you have a problem.

Duh, clearly I do to. My way of supporting the troops is to get the out of there. Our soldiers do a noble duty, but not when its fighting a war under false pretenses. 1,500 dead soldiers isn't old news, considering that our soldiers are still dying there.

I will not get past it, not until the soldiers come home. Every minute that the soldiers are in Iraq fighting a war that was started based on false pretenses, I will not get over it. Every day that this war is fought and the people that started this war (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice, Tenet, etc.) are still in power, I will not get over it. Every time a soldier dies in Iraq, I remember they're there because we were told that the WMD's were an imminent threat, and because of that I will not get over it.

The day that I get over that our leadership lied to us about war (willingly or not) is the day that I become a "fat, lazy American".



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineNonRevKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2154 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 18):
What needs to happen now, since we all know it's too damn late to change anything, is to get behind the soldiers that are still there

I disagree. I think what needs to happen now is the people responsible for this error need to be punished and removed from office. That's what SHOULD be happening now. I can't explain why it is not.

B


User currently offlineDeskPilot From Australia, joined Apr 2004, 767 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2149 times:

Quoting Iakobos (Reply 16):
Following the large-scale slandering of the UN, France and Germany, only to name those three, would anyone think that something along the lines of a "sorry" is due ?

No way Lakobos - when there's a mistake, you just tell people to move on,or that's old news. Refer the various comments above.

Would you like Freedom Fries with that ?



By the way, is there anyone on board who knows how to fly a plane?
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2147 times:

"I know those damned weapons are still there. I just know it!!"

Signed,

Dick Cheney
JetJack74
Jcs17
Another Neocon That Cannot Be Named


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2140 times:

Quoting NonRevKing (Reply 20):
Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 18):
What needs to happen now, since we all know it's too damn late to change anything, is to get behind the soldiers that are still there

I disagree.

Let me get this straight . . . I suggest we get behind and support our troops and you disagree? Is that what you meant to say, you do NOT support our troops?

I don't disagree with the remainder of your post . . . . . .

Quoting NonRevKing (Reply 20):
I think what needs to happen now is the people responsible for this error need to be punished and removed from office. That's what SHOULD be happening now. I can't explain why it is not.

. . . . but I want to make sure I heard you correctly in that you're NOT going to support our troops . . . it's not the TROOPS that are fault . . .


User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8193 posts, RR: 24
Reply 24, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2133 times:

Quoting Tbar220 (Reply 2):
The reason we went to war, and this cannot be denied, was WMD.

The reason we know about. Whether it was touted or not, it's obvious that Iraq had considerable strategic importance in the global war on terror. We needed a foothold in the mid-east. Now, that's just one of my theories... but it makes perfect sense and I'm sure there's alot we don't know. Also, I think they had a perfectly valid reason to believe there were WMDs and unless we went in to be sure you wouldn't even be able to say "ha! told you so!" And besides, you can't fault one person for trusting our nation's top intelligence sources. If you're gunna blame someone blame the FBI, CIA, etc.



This Website Censors Me
25 ANCFlyer : I'm not convinced of that. Don't get me wrong, I support our troops and the effort in Iraq, however . . . consider this. Had the US continued and com
26 DeskPilot : Care to explain this one ?
27 Sacflyer : Didn't that guy who used to be Secretary of State, go to the United Nations and give a BS briefing about WMDs in Iraq. Trust me, there was a knowing
28 Falcon84 : Uh, "that guy" was Colin Powell. Yes, he made a big speech to the UN laying out the case of WMD in Iraq, and to go to war over it. And no, I don't th
29 ANCFlyer : SacFlyer . . . Colin Powell would NOT and did NOT knowingly lie to the United Nations. Of that I can assure you. I have met the man, I have unlimited
30 Sacflyer : Who cares about recent history? I am talking about a briefing that failed to convince me that we needed to go to war with Iraq over WMDs. Powell was t
31 Falcon84 : Sacflyer, even if what you say is true, it does not indicate, nor constitute a lie, on the part of Mr. Bush. If you don't think it made the case-and I
32 ANCFlyer : OK, let me see if I can make this easier on you - because you've obviously missed the point, or are hell bent to leather to be negative where Colin P
33 Tbar220 : What if that one person is the President? What if that one person gave the orders to go to war? What if that one person made the mistake of trusting
34 Tbar220 : Also, in Powell's case I think he made the right decision and resigned from his position. I disapprove of his actions before the war. He should have q
35 FDXMECH : >>> We don't care that this administration lied to us about this war.
36 ANCFlyer : I could do a search, but you could as easily. It was network news. So ought to be fairly easy to find. If memory serves me correctly, he was - for Co
37 Sacflyer : What is your problem with what I said? There was no case for going to war with Iraq over WMDs. Powell went to the United Nations and made a case for
38 Tbar220 : ANC, I'm no fan of all the people that voted for this war. This however does not deny the fact that the driving force behind this war was still Bush,
39 ANCFlyer : Damn, you HAVE to be more dense than I thought, you answered your own question. What is my problem, the fact that you contend Colin Powell is a liar.
40 Sacflyer : I wasn't responding to anything you said. I was referring to JFK because I wanted to.
41 Sacflyer : Yes, you are the only one reading that. When did I say that Colin Powell was a liar? Here I'll get the quote for you. Where does it say that I called
42 ANCFlyer : Understood - my bad. Apologies . . .
43 Sacflyer : The point is even if they believed the Intel, it still did not prove the case for war. The worst case scenario of the Intel did not prove the case fo
44 ANCFlyer : Here's your quote . . . and I'll highlight, and paste below the text, that interpreted perhaps because of the way you presented it, led me to believe
45 Captoveur : This seems to be a common problem with people on the left side. They can't judge an event by the standards of the time. Slavery is bad. So in the lef
46 Mir : There is no question that people make mistakes. Some people make very costly mistakes. But people are human, and it happens. It irritates me that the
47 Iakobos : IMO Colin Powell is (one of) the only persons in this administration who can walk straight, be trusted and perhaps the only one on this earth who coul
48 Falcon84 : Believing the intel you are given-and remember, any Administration needs to TRUST the intel they are given, and acting on it, even if I don't believe
49 Biggles : ANCFlyer and Falcon84 , I haven't been here long , but I always enjoy reading your posts.I don't always agree with what you say,but here I agree with
50 JGPH1A : Yes you can - it's called "Getting back in your C-17 and flying the hell home !". They've got their "democratic" government now, thanks a lot, see-ya
51 ANCFlyer : Oh, sure, and then we piss off the part of the world that isn't already pissed at us for leaving the country in a shambles and flying off in to the s
52 JGPH1A : Normally I'd agree, but in this one instance I think the US presence itself is the cause of most of the problems, not the fact that a democratic gove
53 ANCFlyer : I quite agree, our mere presence causes plenty of discomfort. And I'm not convinced - yet - that a government is place. Duly elected, but IMHO, quite
54 Post contains images ORFflyer : [quote=ANCFlyer,reply=44][a whole host of honorable senators and congresspersons believed it.] That's the best line in this thread.... They're were ri
55 Falcon84 : Again, I don't give a crap WHO said they were for it. Only one man had the power to go to war over it, and that was Mr. Bush. So, you see ORFflyer, t
56 JGPH1A : Do you not think this is contributing to a vicious cycle. 1. US forces remain in Iraq to support unstable new Government 2. Insurgency forces direct
57 ORFflyer : I can't agree with that one Falcon, no US President can go to war without the "permission" of congress. While he may be the ultimate authority, and c
58 ORFflyer : Falcon, "Only one man had the power to go to war over it" That's the text I was trying to quote.... I haven't seemed to have figured out that function
59 Superfly : I am suprise the conservatives aren't blaming Dan Rather or Bill Clinton for all of this.
60 Falcon84 : Congress can give the President the authority to act, but Congress itself cannot send the troops into battle-only the President can do that. Again, C
61 Post contains images HAWK21M : What will GWB say now...... The same thing. regds MEL
62 ORFflyer : But they certainly would not have given him that authority if they had not believed, (at that time) in the reasons. No way one man, even being the Pre
63 Post contains images Superfly : Tbar220: Is you uh anti-Amurican? Signed Dumb@ss Bush supporter
64 N766UA : Put simply, the majority of our problems with terror are coming from the middle east. Being able to set up shop over there and gain a foothold is a c
65 N766UA : And we all know he'll be both blamed and lauded. Only World War 2 comes to mind as a war where the entire country was united in its purpose.
66 ANCFlyer : Sorry, had to work today (yeah it happens now and then) . . . now to your questions . . . . 1. No, not yet. I'm not sure all the Iraqi's are convinced
67 Bahadir : Clinton lies , our country suffers $100 mil. on the investigation. Bush lies, our country is in $500 bil. deficit and 1500 young guys/gals are dead in
68 Post contains links CaptOveur : Kerry being brought up continually shows just how empty-headed some people are on here. He lost, move on. Bush won, live with it.... and regardless o
69 Schoenorama : Honestly Captoveur, proof of Powell's lies and deception have been all over this board ever since Powell had his speech: it's just that you and other
70 CaptOveur : See previous post. The short form since you seem to be reading impared, or maybe your English isn't so good: A lie is only a lie if you KNOW the info
71 Post contains links Schoenorama : I typed my reply at the same time that you typed yours. That's why I hadn't read it. No need at all to make that pathetic observation about my Englis
72 Boeing7E7 : If the reason for going in where humanitarian would you have bought it? Nope.
73 Schoenorama : That's another "what if" that's completely irrelevant. The humanitarian aspect was never the reason to invade Iraq for the mere fact that the America
74 Tbar220 : I have to agree, why are you providing an answer for your quesiton? Why are you assuming that people are going to answer a certain way? That's not ho
75 Eitlean : Schoenerama has taken the trouble to provide a concise, well-argued and highly cogent summary of the fiasco that has been the US/UK invasion of Iraq.
76 CORULEZ05 : and I wonder why this does not surprise me? This was a given already. We all knew it but some decided to blindly continue supporting our "president".
77 ANCFlyer : I do, one brother to go, and several friends. One brother returned last Tuesday. And I concur with CaptOveur in this statement . . . . . . As was sai
78 Post contains images Klaus : ANCFlyer: As was said by myself and some others above, it's a bit late to second guess the fact that we are there - we are. You would be right if it h
79 ANCFlyer : The point I was making Klaus, is that reagardless of the reason(s) for our being there, like them or not, think them just or otherwise, we simply can
80 Klaus : ANCFlyer, I don´t criticize your position in this matter by itself. Under the circumstances, I agree with you (which I recognize is easier for me to
81 ANCFlyer : Agreed . . . Not at all my friend. When anyone makes a point with which I agree, I readily so state. I think perhaps we're agreeing on the bigger pic
82 Klaus : Klaus: I agree with you (which I recognize is easier for me to say than it is for you). ANCFlyer: Not at all my friend. When anyone makes a point with
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Report: Hundreds Of WMDs Found In Iraq posted Thu Jun 22 2006 04:26:08 by Jetjack74
No Banned Arms Found In Iraq posted Thu Sep 25 2003 16:25:19 by Qb001
WMD Have Been Found In Iraq! posted Fri Apr 11 2003 02:27:41 by I LOVE EWR
US Report About The War In Iraq posted Mon Sep 25 2006 10:03:18 by Sebolino
No More Insurgents In Iraq! posted Wed Nov 30 2005 18:35:40 by Texan
A Marine's Report On The War In Iraq posted Thu Nov 17 2005 04:47:22 by PROSA
Biggest Marijuana Joint Ever! Found In Iraq posted Mon Nov 22 2004 00:06:03 by Techrep
CD Containing School Plans Found In Iraq posted Fri Oct 8 2004 07:53:35 by L-188
262 Mass Graves Found In Iraq (1,000,000+ Victims) posted Wed Sep 8 2004 01:27:15 by B757300
More Chemical Weapons Found In Iraq posted Fri Jul 2 2004 04:51:41 by B757300