He's a knob who did support Saddam Hussein. He discredits all legitimate anti-war arguments with his nonsense.
Over the course of the last decade, he's turned into a strange man who instantly loses is under the slightest critisism. He declared the Senate subcomittee as 'pro-war', despite the fact more than one of the members were Democrats who voted against the war. In fact, one of the members is the only Republican to vote against the war.
He doesn't tell the truth, he merely spins whatever he likes to make himself seem like the god he thinks he is.
Padcrasher From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1192 times:
No you need to educate yourself on how these commitees work. The majority sets the agenda, allocates funds, determines what will be investigated. Determines what requests for info will go to the executive branch. The only thing balanced about them is during Q&A the minority members get to ask their own questions and pontificate.
Jetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7456 posts, RR: 49
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1070 times:
Esta loco en la cabasa. So America is purposely driving up the price of the world oil supply. Are you aware that very little of the worlds oil supply is actually coming from Iraq? The infrastructure is not yet there for mass exports. The reason the price of oil is so high is because the lower outputfrom Russia and Venezuela and the high consumption from coming from China. Yes, China has overtaken the US as the worlds largest consumer of oil. This assertion that this was a war for oil is rediculous.
B757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 21
Reply 19, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1063 times:
Quoting L-188 (Reply 12): I wonder how many children he indirectly killed by accepting Saddam's money.
It wouldn't matter if it was proven that 100,000 children died because of Galloway's corruption. Heck, it wouldn't matter if he personally killed them. He will be defended to the end by those who hate the United States and/or hate our current President simply because he is rabidly anti-American and rabidly anti-Bush. It doesn't matter that he was on the take from one of the worst mass murderers since Mao Tse-Tung.
Klaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21592 posts, RR: 53
Reply 20, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1054 times:
The 100,000 or more iraqis killed during the invasion matter.
And the more than 1,000,000 iraqis killed by the sanctions matter.
And the many thousands of iraqis and iranians killed on behalf of Saddam matter.
Your feeble attempts of deflecting interest in those deaths, however, away from an administration you´ve sold your soul to do not matter.