Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
London Vs Paris 2012, The Official Olympic Thread  
User currently offline707CMF From France, joined Mar 2002, 4885 posts, RR: 29
Posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3401 times:

Next wednesday, Singapore shall (...) tell us which of those cities will (...) hold the 2012 Olympics.

Living in Paris, I am one of the few who honestly wish London shall get the bid.

What about you guys ? Who do you think shall get the bid, who do you want to get the bid ?

Cheers,

707

47 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAR1300 From Argentina, joined Feb 2005, 1740 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3399 times:

wasn't NY on this too???

Mike



They don't call us Continental for nothing.
User currently offlineToulouse From Switzerland, joined Apr 2005, 2759 posts, RR: 57
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3390 times:

Yeah AR1300, NY was/is a candidate, but a while ago Paris, London and Madrid were announced as the three favourites in that order by the Organisers.

[Edited 2005-07-04 10:35:31]


Long live Aer Lingus!
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12887 posts, RR: 46
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3356 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

NY couldn't seem to make up its mind as to whether it really wanted the games or not.

I've got mixed feelings about this one. As proud as Id be if London won, I'd be concerned that we'd make an almighty fcuk-up of it.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana! #44cHAMpion
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3353 times:

Paris should get it - they have the least to do in terms of building new infrastructure, transport, stadia etc. Plus Paris is a tourist gridlock nightmare in summer anyway, adding the games won't make it much worse. Most Parisians leave the city around then anyway and come infest us down at the coast.

User currently offlineBNE From Australia, joined Mar 2000, 3189 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3349 times:

I don't really care who gets it, Paris or London.


Why fly non stop when you can connect
User currently offlineNYCFlyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1388 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3347 times:

go New York!!! Paris will win the most votes in the first round, but no one will get a majority, so once Moscow and Madrid are knocked out and it's NYC vs. LON vs. PAR, watch out

Quoting Scbriml (Reply 3):
NY couldn't seem to make up its mind as to whether it really wanted the games or not.

People want the games. It's a small number of selfish politicians who stonewalled plans for the west side stadium. But the organizers have already drawn up approved blueprints for an alternate stadium. It's not in Manhattan, but it will be much easier to build.


User currently offlineGkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24964 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3345 times:

Well if Paris is indeed in France, it will surrender and London will win.
 duck 



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offline7FTwinOtter From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 172 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3333 times:

I dont think New York has a chance, America has had its fair share of Olympics in the last few decades (LA 84, Atlanta 96, salt lake city 02). I think its neck and neck between Paris and London. Do I care which one gets it? Not in the slightest, both would be good.

User currently offlineQANTASforever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3304 times:

I think London will get it.

NY simply hasn't expressed the necessary support for the notion. Moscow had it too recently as Spain did with Barcelona, and I think French industrial action at the construction stage and eventually during the games will concern the IOC too much to award it to them.

So I think it will be London. The UK could stage an excellent games, and London could certainly use the improvements in infrastructure associated with the Olympics.

QFF


User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13200 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3283 times:

My money would be on Paris for a number of reasons including that many venues needed already exist and others can be cheaply modified or added as needed (as happened with Los Angeles), have strong existing tourist and transportation infratructure (many hotels, very good Metro, Regional and long distance rail service, good large airports like CDG and 2 smaller airports). I also feel it is time for an EC country to host them, and the politics of France, while somewhat conterversial per the USA, is less of a problem for many particpating countries. USA/NYC has infrastructure problems, London has local transit infrastructure problems, Russia/Moscow - terrible infrastructure for tourists, horrendously corrupt government, questionable personal safety issues. As to Madrid, the Olympics were perviously held in Barcelona not that many years ago, along with infrastructure issues.

User currently offlineQANTASFOREVER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3280 times:

Wow. I just realised that in 2012 it will have been 20 years since the Barcelona Olympics.

Sheesh!

QFF


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3278 times:

I don't really mind either way. To me, it's too close to call, i'd say Paris just on the basis that it's probably the better equipped-to-cope of the two.

User currently offlineJamman From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3273 times:

I'm not really bothered who wins, I reckon both cities would make a good job of it, both spectactular cities in their own right.

Now if Manchester was in the running that would be another matter   (I know I'm in cloud cuckoo land)

[Edited 2005-07-04 17:02:00]


Phoning it in from a place with no phones.
User currently offlineFlpuck6 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2123 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3265 times:

I have already decided I'm taking my vacation summer 2012 in Paris ... that is when Paris is announced as the host city  Wink LOL!

I really feel that Paris and its citizens really want it, the advertising and the efforts to show they can handle the Games is amazing.



Bonjour Chef!
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7438 posts, RR: 50
Reply 15, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3259 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting NYCFlyer (Reply 6):
go New York!!! Paris will win the most votes in the first round, but no one will get a majority, so once Moscow and Madrid are knocked out and it's NYC vs. LON vs. PAR, watch out

Sorry NYCFlyer, I don't think it'll be New York. I think it'll be London(I hope), because when was the last time England has hosted the Olympics? What was it, like 1920. In the last 30 years, no country other than the US has hosted more Oympic Games than us. Lake Placid, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Salt Lake City. I think the IOC would like to see the games held elsewhere. I think that London has the facilities or the resouces to to build them when needed. The only thing is the weather is so unpredictable.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineBCAL From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 3384 posts, RR: 15
Reply 16, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3253 times:

Being British, I sincerely hope that Paris is chosen over London. For starters, the weather in London is unpredictable and rain will probably result in the games going on for longer than expected. But the real reasons why I do not want the games held in London are

  • England's transport system is already almost gridlocked and cannot cope with the normal daily demands. If you add all the extra traffic that would arise if the games were held, I think the roads and rails will come to a standstill unless massive investment and improvement is made immediately.
  • New massive stadiums will have to be built. Whether this is left to private or state enterprises, they will all end up costing millions more than budgeted and will all be plagued by delays in construction
  • When the games are over, we will be left with white elephants just like that Millennium Dome
  • The only reason why Blair wants England to win the bid is for his ego

Sorry but I do not want the Olympic Games to be held in UK.



MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7438 posts, RR: 50
Reply 17, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3251 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting BCAL (Reply 16):
Sorry but I do not want the Olympic Games to be held in UK

And I don't think the residents in New York want them either. It was Bloomberg's hope that they would get it, but a majority of New Yorkers do not want the games there.

Quoting BCAL (Reply 16):
New massive stadiums will have to be built. Whether this is left to private or state enterprises, they will all end up costing millions more than budgeted and will all be plagued by delays in construction

And not to mention the construction of an Olympic Village, which is a complete waste of money, like the World's Fair sites that were left abandoned for a few years until the cities finally dedicated them as city parks..



Made from jets!
User currently offlineBCAL From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 3384 posts, RR: 15
Reply 18, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3239 times:

Another reason why we do not want the games to be held in London: Massive security measures and higher risk of terrorist attack will disrupt the daily lives of thousands of people. And who pays for the extra security?


MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13253 posts, RR: 77
Reply 19, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3228 times:

London coped OK with Multiple large events just this last weekend.
Or didn't the Daily Mail report that?

And if we start worrying too much about terrorist attacks, we might as well all become reclusive survivalists now, Paris has narrowly avoided terror attacks in recent years, so again, off the medias radar.

London last held the games in 1948, an austere but successful games, despite the terrible condition of the country after WW2, nowhere else in Europe at least was capable of staging them, got the Olympics out of a hole then.

Of course in those days, people tended to get on with things, not listen to the incessant media babble we have now.


User currently offlineIBERIA747 From Spain, joined Aug 2003, 1831 posts, RR: 58
Reply 20, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3191 times:

Quoting LTBEWR (Reply 10):
As to Madrid, the Olympics were perviously held in Barcelona not that many years ago, along with infrastructure issues.

What do you mean with "infrastructure issues"?

Madrid was rated as the best out of the 5 candidates for it's communications infrastructure (highways, new airport, the best subway in Europe, etc) and about the sports infrastructure let me tell you that 83% of the needed infrastructure is already built or in process of being built making it the best candidate in that aspect also. Ohhh and don't forget that Madrid has 91% of popular support...above the other candidates also.

The only weakness when it comes to infrastructure is the Hotel accomodation...should be bigger than it is.

Anyway, all of the above won't do much in favour of Madrid as it seems as if the Olympic Comitte had already decided to give the games to Paris. London is also a good candidate but I don't think there's too much they can do to get those games.

NYC and Moscow...I think they "lost the battle" a long time ago.



¡¡VIVA ESPAÑA!!
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26815 posts, RR: 75
Reply 21, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3162 times:

Quoting 707CMF (Thread starter):
Living in Paris, I am one of the few who honestly wish London shall get the bid.

I agree that my second home (Los Angeles 1, London 2) should get the 2012 games

Quoting Scbriml (Reply 3):
As proud as Id be if London won, I'd be concerned that we'd make an almighty fcuk-up of it.

Not at all. I think London would really come together to throw a great bash

Quoting QANTASforever (Reply 9):
Moscow had it too recently

Does 1980 really count?

Quoting LTBEWR (Reply 10):
London has local transit infrastructure problems

London's local transport is similar to Paris.

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 17):
And not to mention the construction of an Olympic Village, which is a complete waste of money, like the World's Fair sites that were left abandoned for a few years until the cities finally dedicated them as city parks..

London has published their plan for construction and it is really well laid out and most of The Games will be in an area that is currently not all that crowded, meaning the areas where crowding of transport can be an issue (Central London) will not be as affected. An Olympic Village can easily be converted to other uses. Los Angeles provides a key example where the Olympic Village was at UCLA and then converted to student housing.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineAsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3149 times:

Paris would love to host the Olympics. At no other time could so many Parisians gloat in arrogance when very few people speak to them in French. As usual, they are probably proficient in the visitors' native languages, but play stupid in order to inflate their personal egos. When the poor Australian walks away in confusion, the Parisian will turn to his friend and say, in perfect English, "What a f*cking loser! He should have learned French before coming here."

Mark


User currently offlineTrekster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3131 times:

Would love the London to get it

Hate the city, but i think we are ready to host it, what with all the stuff that happens there, and there is even skope to house some things around the coutny, like in MAN who held the Commonwelth games a few years back


GO LONDON FOR 2012


User currently offlineWhiteHatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3126 times:

Quoting BCAL (Reply 16):

Sorry but I do not want the Olympic Games to be held in UK.

I've got to agree with you and for the reasons you give. London may be the glamourous name, but it is a nightmare in the making.

I really don't believe all the glossy hype and smoothing over of problems that has gone on. A much better location would have been somewhere near Birmingham, based around the existing facilities of the NEC and BHX.

Blair would also not be in Number 10 come 2012, so that I don't agree with. He is promoting it hard because he believes in it and it is also his job. But I would think that secretly he wouldn't be that bothered if Paris wins for the same reasons.


25 Gkirk : Down to London and Paris
26 Post contains images Matt27 : Go London!!!
27 Jasepl : He he! Of course, you're assuming that any Parisians at all would bother staying in Paris during the Olympics!
28 A340600 : I really want London to get it, but I have a feeling Paris may take it, Sam
29 707CMF : Go London !!! Cheers, 707
30 Post contains images Scotty : Allez Paris Cheers aye Scotty
31 QANTASFOREVER : Massive deja vu! Look, It's going to be 6 years of moaning and groaning about bureaucrats, red tape, bungles, over spending - and then in 2012 it wil
32 Post contains images Gman94 : Well said QFF too many of my countrymen are always too quick to knock and put down what Britain tries to do, which is a sad character failing of my c
33 BNE : The winner is London,
34 Post contains images Jaspike : London got it Tom
35 Lazyshaun : LONDON HAVE DONE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111
36 Gkirk : London have won it! Congratulations!
37 Lazyshaun : loooooooooooondon have done it!!!!!!!!1
38 Post contains images Gman94 : Yes, Yes and more Yes, I can't believe it.
39 707CMF : Hooraaayyy !!! (coming from one of the only French wanting the games to be out of Paris !!!) Cheers, 707
40 QANTASforever : WELL DONE LONDON!!!!!!!!! This is going to be such an amazingly wonderful thing. You will do an excellent games - my sincerest best wishes to you all.
41 Post contains images VH-KCT* : Congratulations, London! Good luck, and enjoy what is a truly fantastic event.
42 Post contains images Monteycarlos : In case anyone didn't know - London have it.
43 JoKeR : Congratulations London, I know the Serbian Olympic Committee candidly supported the British bid! Well done!
44 Post contains images Granite : Hi all Great news for London. Now let Chirac hobble home with frogs leg's are crutches and a haggis shoved up his a** Regards Gary
45 Scbriml : ...and chased by a mad cow! I'd love to see the faces when Blair greets Chirac at the G8 later today. Blair will be grinning even more than usual, an
46 Pe@rson : Well done London! I am pleased for you.
47 Post contains links AC320 : Since London won, please continue here: http://www.airliners.net/discussions/non_aviation/read.main/869565/
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Official Owned Thread! posted Fri Nov 10 2006 09:09:00 by FXramper
The Official 24 Thread posted Tue Mar 21 2006 05:08:09 by Bridogger6
The Official NHL Thread posted Fri Nov 11 2005 22:24:09 by TPASXM787
11/11 The Official Dismissal Thread posted Wed Nov 9 2005 23:12:06 by QANTASFOREVER
The Official Quitters Thread posted Wed Jun 29 2005 00:48:50 by FlyAUA
The Official SoCal Thread posted Tue Jan 11 2005 02:08:22 by Matt D
The Official UF Vs. FSU Thread posted Sun Nov 21 2004 06:29:01 by Mia
The Official A.net Chat 'Fantasy' Thread...... posted Mon Nov 6 2006 21:58:57 by BMIFlyer
The Official Winter F1 Thread posted Tue Oct 24 2006 02:54:58 by Jamesbuk
The Official I Am Bored Thread... Who Is With Me? posted Mon Oct 16 2006 20:45:40 by WILCO737