Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Drivers On Cell Phones More Likely To Crash  
User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1842 times:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/07/12/cells.drivers/index.html

They needed a study to figure that out? No safety benefit to hands free is a bit of a surprise though.

I never have understood what call could be so important as to make taking it while driving an imperative. Just talk to them when you get home or to the office.

30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJamie757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1826 times:

I heard this on the radio this morning, apparently you're four times more likely to crash if you're on the phone, handsfree or not. It amazes me that there are so many people out there that are willing to risk their own lives and the lives of others for the sake of a phone call.

Quoting SATL382G (Thread starter):
No safety benefit to hands free is a bit of a surprise though.

I agree, I don't do either though, I pull in and turn my engine off if I'm going to take a call. It's illegal to accept a call in this country with engine on (If I remember rightly? Somebody correct me if I'm wrong).

 Smile

Rgds.


User currently offlineDba4U From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 668 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1802 times:

It's prohibited in Germany as well, but handsfree it's allowed... Yet another German low which is not quiet meaningful...

User currently offlineVivek0072 From India, joined Jun 2005, 284 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1801 times:

Its illegal in India too even with the hands free, there were a couple of accidents in my state due to the hands free, so even hands free was banned, you have to stop your car and take the phone call.

You loose ur attention while driving, its simple you don't need a research/survey to tell that.



That life's most failures were people who did not realise how close they were to success when they gave up. - Edison.
User currently offlineCaptOveur From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1799 times:

I honestly don't care if these morons risk their own lives.

It is when they risk mine that I start to get pissed off. If someone is on a cell phone they get no courtesy from me.


User currently offlineOldeuropean From Germany, joined May 2005, 2091 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1793 times:

Quoting Jamie757 (Reply 1):
It's illegal to accept a call in this country with engine on

I don`t know how it is in the UK, but here in Germany and the most other EU countries it`s illegal, because of these risks. But never the less you can see many idiots in their cars, using their mobile. Sometimes you can already recognize them from far away, because they are swerving in snake lines.

Axel



Wer nichts weiss muss alles glauben
User currently offlineOhTheDrama747 From UK - Scotland, joined Jan 2005, 291 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1782 times:

Quoting Jamie757 (Reply 1):
I agree, I don't do either though, I pull in and turn my engine off if I'm going to take a call. It's illegal to accept a call in this country with engine on

Jamie757,

Although i'm not 100% sure, i think you're allowed to accept a call so long as it's handsfree...Don't quote me on that though.

Cheers,
G


User currently offlineJamie757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1773 times:

Quoting OhTheDrama747 (Reply 6):
Although i'm not 100% sure, i think you're allowed to accept a call so long as it's handsfree...Don't quote me on that though.

Sorry, I was a little vague as to what I meant, I don't use a handsfree kit so I have no option but to stop if I want/need to answer a call. You are correct, it is legal to accept or make a call from a handsfree kit provided the phone is mounted in a cradle on the dashboard. You are not permitted to hold the handset whilst driving.

Hope that helps to clarify.

Rgds.


User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1763 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It's amazing the amount of irresponsible people who still use a mobile while driving, every day i see at least four or five people using a mobile while driving. Last week i saw a lady approach a roundabout while chatting away on her phone. In that space of time, she managed to look slow down, indicate, change gears and speed off into an exit without looking ANYWHERE apart from straight ahead.


In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1760 times:

It's too bad people who don't have the brain capacity to do more than 1 thing at a time ruin it for the rest of us.

User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1743 times:

Quoting B744F (Reply 9):
It's too bad people who don't have the brain capacity to do more than 1 thing at a time ruin it for the rest of us.

Would be interesting to know how many have died or caused others to die because they were sure they could "do more than 1 thing at a time". The figures would probably make the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks look insignificant casualty wise......


User currently offlineSTLGph From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 9501 posts, RR: 26
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1740 times:

Quoting SATL382G (Thread starter):
I never have understood what call could be so important as to make taking it while driving an imperative. Just talk to them when you get home or to the office.

because some people don't have the choice....their office is often in their cars and the cell phone is the center point.

for example--

i am in the news business and outside of the studios, the field is our office and the phone can often be a vital tool for the job. about 90% of the time, the tv news reporter gets to talk while the cameraman drives. but if you are in newspapers, you don't get that luxury. you are hook, line, and sinker when it comes to news reporting. pulling over to use the phone and turning off the car is next to absurd in this business. that means you are wasting time beating competition to get there. you missed the body being pulled. you missed the explosion. you missed great sound bites and quotes from eye witnesses and the emergency response spokes personnel. sometimes with print journalists, you have to phone your story in and dictate it over the phone while driving to the next point of interest so you can make deadline.

i only work three (sometimes four) days a week and i can attribute an average of over 1,500 minutes a month for work. many full timers i know can reach 3 to 4,000 minutes a month.



if assumptions could fly, airliners.net would be the world's busiest airport
User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1739 times:

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 10):
Would be interesting to know how many have died or caused others to die because they were sure they could "do more than 1 thing at a time". The figures would probably make the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks look insignificant casualty wise......

Wow, that was very informative.


User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1732 times:

Quoting STLGph (Reply 11):
because some people don't have the choice....their office is often in their cars and the cell phone is the center point.

What do you mean "don't have a choice"? Some how the news got reported before cell phones didn't it? What you mean is that your industry is so competitive that it ignores safe and prudent practices to make a buck...

Now I know that if you're driving you aren't gathering news so you can't tell me it's essential.

Print media huh? Boy it's real important that you phone the news in so I don't get my paper late. Oh wait I still get my paper ontime regardless of wether you stop to call it in or not....

edit: sorry. I have a low regard for the media in general, unrelated to the topic of this thread.

[Edited 2005-07-12 23:54:37]

User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1710 times:

I think if it can be demonstrated that you were on the phone while in an accident, life sentence. If you kill someone* death penality!!!


There was some dumb bitch in the Central Florida who ALLEGEDLY ran a red light and killed two beautiful young girls aged 3 and 6 (I think). Do I need to say witnesses said she was on her cell at the time? She has been charged, and trial is pending.


User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13170 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1699 times:

Yes, I admit to using my cell (mobile) phone while driving a very few times. But I have seen too may yahoos weaving, driving up/down on the gas pedal and NOT really driving while on a cell phone to make me not want to do it any more. A few weeks ago, the Discovery Channel program 'Mythbusters' did a test of the affects of cellphone use as well as being legally drunk while driving on a controlled off-street course. Turns out to confirm other studies that cell phone use was as hazardous as being legally drunk, and in some situations even worse. Besides, often while driving with the phone, the signal will cut out, drop and you lose your conversation, so is it worth it?

User currently offlineNKP S2 From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1714 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1692 times:

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 13):

What do you mean "don't have a choice"? Some how the news got reported before cell phones didn't it? What you mean is that your industry is so competitive that it ignores safe and prudent practices to make a buck...

Now I know that if you're driving you aren't gathering news so you can't tell me it's essential.

Amen! Cell phones should be a mobile panic button for use in serious matters and nothing more. Prior to the cellphone explosion, a call of signifigant gravity would be made at a roadside public phone, or made prior to hitting the road. Having the damn things just resulted in having more chit-chat, whether driving, shoppping, standing in line at the bank etc. "..Whatcha' dooo-ing?" "...No honey, you're NOT fat" "You parents can come visit anytime..." "...Baked turkey breast would be fine...." "SELL!" "BUY!" What a bunch of spurious BS.

Who was the sagacious wag who wryly ( and astutely I might add ) commented on the telephone in the late-19th century? The hoopla stated: ......"Maine can talk to Florida!". He quipped: "But does Maine have anything to say to Florida??".

Love it!


User currently offlineCRJonBeez From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 317 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1676 times:

i can't tell you how many people have been on their phones and cut out in front of me while i'm riding because they're too distracted by their phone to look both ways. on a side note, according to the american motorcyclist association, motorcyclists are MUCH less likely to be the ones causing accidents on the road (on bike or car) than other drivers.

not that this means crotch rockets are ok if they're doing 80 in a 40mph zone dodging cars. i own a rocket and don't condone it at all


User currently offlineCornish From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 8187 posts, RR: 54
Reply 18, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1663 times:

The irony over here in the UK, is tha tthe people who you see most frequently using the phone while driving are the school run mums in their big SUVs. (You only really seem to see men wearing bluetooth headsets).

These women drive big SUVs because they want a feeling of safety for them and their kids, yet at the same time think nothing of booking the hairdressers appointment, for after they've dropped off the kids at school, while they are driving.....



Just when I thought I could see light at the end of the tunnel, it was some B*****d with a torch bringing me more work
User currently offlineJCS17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 39
Reply 19, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1669 times:

Does smoking really cause lung cancer?


America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
User currently offlineMelpax From Australia, joined Apr 2005, 1640 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1656 times:

Even more stupid is people texting while driving. There was a case here a couple of years ago where someone was charged after hitting & killing a cyclist while sending a text.


Essendon - Whatever it takes......
User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1640 times:

Eating, doing makeup, reaching for things, reading the paper or other material, and talking to other people in the car is more dangerous than talking on a cell phone, in my opinion.

User currently offlineSTLGph From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 9501 posts, RR: 26
Reply 22, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1623 times:

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 13):
What do you mean "don't have a choice"? Some how the news got reported before cell phones didn't it? What you mean is that your industry is so competitive that it ignores safe and prudent practices to make a buck...

news vehicles used to get around by use of CB radio.

problem is, stations would constantly mess around with each other. "WOW, WE JUST FOUND THREE DEAD BODIES NEXT TO THIS DUMPSTER!"

etc.

you get the idea.

and yeah, we ignore a lot of things to make a quick buck. we want to get to the pay off of the anchor chair position.

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 13):
Now I know that if you're driving you aren't gathering news so you can't tell me it's essential.

you can call in to your editor and producer and dictate copy to meet deadline.
you can also make phone calls to contacts to verify information.

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 13):
Print media huh? Boy it's real important that you phone the news in so I don't get my paper late. Oh wait I still get my paper ontime regardless of wether you stop to call it in or not....

it's not a matter of getting the paper ontime. it's a matter of getting the news in on time.



if assumptions could fly, airliners.net would be the world's busiest airport
User currently offlineCORULEZ05 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1621 times:

Quoting SATL382G (Thread starter):
No safety benefit to hands free is a bit of a surprise though.

that is absolute BS. In my car I have hands free (Bluetooth) where calls come on over the speakers and it is ABSOLUTELY very very safe. Completely hands free with no cords or anything. Bad thing is, people think you are talking to yourself....hehe

I think more cars should come with this technology to make our roads safer. But honestly, the problem isn't people talking on the phone while driving but the person driving itself....I say give harsher penalties for reckless drivers and get them off the road!!!!...don't blame cells.


User currently offlineS12PPL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1590 times:

No....

Drivers eating while driving, doing they're make-up, playing with the radio, talking to passengers, adjusting they're seat, finding a map, taking a drink for a beverage, shaving(Yes, I've seen it), doing they're hair, using the GPS, checking they're mirrors, thinking about something bad that happened during the day, reading something(Yes, I've seen it), or doing anything else I've mentioned are likely to get in a crash..if not MORE likely than someone using they're phone. These studies are a crock of s**t to me, as they don't prove anything other than some people can't walk and chew gum. I am so sick and god damned tired of driving on the interstate, and looking at someone who parks themselves in the fast lane and doesn't observe traffic around them at all. They are the biggest safety risk, as they have no f**king clue what's going on around them. They don't know if someone is approaching, or in they're blind spot if for some reason they had to avoid an object in the road. But more than anything...They are usually the ones screwing up the flow of traffic. Every time someone finally passes them....THEN they get over into the middle/slow lane. It's like "Oh! I guess I should get over now. Six cars passed me and I'm not even going with the flow of traffic. In Oregon we have the basic rule. That is if everyone on the interstate is going 70 in the fast lane...so should you. If everyone is going 65 (Posted MAX. speed on all OR highways and interstates...), then you go 65. You get the idea. I am sick and tired of being in a rush to get somewhere, only to have to slow down for 10 miles because one person can't get they're act in gear and move over. Nope...they HAVE to go 60 mph., while everyone wants to go faster. These people scare me, as they will be the root cause of accidents. They have no clue what is going on around them, and they will be the one to freak out and cause an accident. Not me on my cell phone trying to wrap something important up.


Sorry, rant over. Thanks.


25 STLGph : i'm guilty of all of those actually. even the make up thing. i was doing a show in which i was singing the opening the number and was running late fro
26 HAWK21M : In Mumbai Driving with the Hands free is ok.The Other day I was Talking on the Hands free in front of a Cop who asked me for a time check. regds MEL
27 L410Turbolet : Yeah. Same here. You see these people in expensive BMWs, Jaguars holding the phone trying to look like Mr./Ms. Important all the time. One would thin
28 A330Fan1 : it completely makes sense...when drivin, pay attention to the road n dont worry bout the phone! just call the person back when u get off.
29 SATX : Actually, this has been known in the US for about ten years now thanks to previous studies conducted here. The only surprising part is that Americans
30 Crjonbeez : i've heard some rants in my time, but this is a bit ridiculous...if you had any argument going for you, it was flushed directly down the toilet when
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Graduate Women More Likely To Orgasm: Official posted Mon Sep 25 2006 12:53:10 by Nighthawk
More Likely To Be Killed By Police Than Terrorist posted Fri Sep 15 2006 15:30:04 by Cairo
Goths "more Likely To Self Harm" posted Fri Apr 14 2006 11:03:44 by Christa
Blacks Five Times More Likely To Die Of Asthma posted Mon Feb 13 2006 18:06:22 by StuckinMAF
Study: Fat Kids More Likely To Be Bullied posted Mon May 3 2004 16:37:21 by IndustrialPate
Opinions On Cell Phones posted Mon Jun 25 2001 08:36:37 by Sxmarbury33
Women Drivers In Suvs On Their Cell Phones! posted Fri Jun 28 2002 08:58:00 by Leftypilot79
Detroit Outlaws Cell Phones For Drivers posted Thu May 4 2006 00:34:40 by Dtwclipper
More On Sweeping Nasa Changes, Return To The Moon posted Tue Jan 13 2004 00:20:06 by AvObserver
Where To Buy Cell Phones Without Calling Plans? posted Tue Sep 9 2003 18:53:40 by Jgore