TedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 906 times:
First and foremost, I am opposed to anything be FORCED on anyone.
That being said, I'm wondering WHY Americans are afraid of a national ID system?
LEST we forget that A) ALL of us carry a Social Security card and B) a lot of the members of this forum (I expect) carry a passport.
The reason I bring this up is Katrina and all the problems people are having identifying themselves. I would THINK that given a national name/address/SSN/thumbprint/picture DB, it would be VERY easy for FEMA to match up people to who they say they are and easily re-issue an ID that they could use to get a job. Heaven forbid that such a system be used to keep Illegal Aliens from working in this country.. I just don't get it.. (I know what else is new)
ManuCH From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 3007 posts, RR: 48
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 899 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD MODERATOR
Stupid question... does an (optional) ID currently exist in the US? Or is the only form of identification the driver's license? How does a person without a driver's license identify itself as of today?
DfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 912 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 886 times:
>> Any official government document with your picture is considered ID in the USA. (birth certificate, passport, drvers license, etc)
Birth certificates don't have pictures, but can be used with another photo ID as verification sometimes.
>> Stupid question... does an (optional) ID currently exist in the US? Or is the only form of identification the driver's license? How does a person without a driver's license identify itself as of today?
Yes, but it's at the state level, not federal level. Most (if not all) offer non-driver's liscense ID cards. They look exactly like a DL except they have "Identification" written in bold letters. For example:
LTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 12878 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 884 times:
Mananging a national ID card and database program in the USA would be a monstorous undertaking. It could conflict with our Constitution as to Federalism (powers and duties of the states vs. the Federal government) as well as serious constitutionally protected personal privacy issues. On the other hand, it would make it easier to id people whom lose their info (as from Hurricane Katrina), keep better track of criminals, reduce ID theft, but at a high cost of loss of privacy and possible abuse.
The state agencies that handle motor vehicle registration and drivers licensing also issue non-drivers picture id's, to provide id needs like to fly, enter secured building, residency proof, and so on. Because of the obtaining of drivers licenses with fradulent documents and information by the 9/11 hijackers, nationally eventually and already in some states there are strict programs of proof of idenity to obtain a drivers license or non-drivers ID. This includes requiring original stamped sealed birth certificates, or if a naturaized citizen, your citizenship papers among other documents. This is flawed too as we now see with the evacuees of Hurricane Katrina whom didn't bring those documents with them.
I think only the USA and the UK are among the only countries without a national ID card scheme. While it should be considered in both countries, (as to the UK, then you wouldn't need a passport to go to other EC countries!), there are issues as noted above that hold back our politicans from doing so.
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 874 times:
Quoting TedTAce (Thread starter): LEST we forget that A) ALL of us carry a Social Security card and B) a lot of the members of this forum (I expect) carry a passport.
We carry neither of those around with us on a regular basis. At least I don't. But why go through the trouble of making a whole new ID system when the current state ID's work just fine? As long as states keep updating their ID's like NJ did to the super-secure ones, I think we are fine. And just stop giving ID's to illegals, but that is a whole different issue.