Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bush Will Nominate Samuel Alito  
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1478 times:

Didn't take long to find another nominee . . .

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/31/scotus.bush/index.html





And following the lead of some other A-Netters . . .

These make no gawddamn sense at all . . . .


Will & Grace, Worst Sitcom Ever? by Bofredrik 2005-10-28 20:19:33
New Year In Rio De Janeiro: Who Will Be There? by Hardiwv 2005-10-13 16:38:51
Hallowennie....Is Almost Here...What Will You Be? by Vaporlock 2005-10-14 03:15:43

[Edited 2005-10-31 13:42:52]

89 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 5980 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1471 times:

Oh, this should be fun Big grin

User currently offlineMidnightMike From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2892 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1466 times:

Quote:
Legal experts consider the 55-year-old Alito so ideologically similar to Justice Antonin Scalia that he has earned the nickname "Scalito."

Amazing how CNN gets away with this crap, his nickname is actually, Scalito-Lite and he earned that nickname because he is considered a liberal-Scalito, don't get me wrong, he will still lean toward conservative issues, but, not at conservative as the news piece would have you believe.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineRJpieces From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1428 times:

Sounds good from what I've read so far....In terms of credentials anyway.

[Edited 2005-10-31 16:22:19]

User currently offlineUsnseallt82 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 4891 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Thread starter):
These make no gawddamn sense at all . . .

 checkmark  yes 



Crye me a river
User currently offlineMidnightMike From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2892 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

Quoting MidnightMike (Reply 2):
Quote:
Legal experts consider the 55-year-old Alito so ideologically similar to Justice Antonin Scalia that he has earned the nickname "Scalito."

Amazing how CNN gets away with this crap, his nickname is actually, Scalito-Lite and he earned that nickname because he is considered a liberal-Scalito, don't get me wrong, he will still lean toward conservative issues, but, not at conservative as the news piece would have you believe.

Boy did I jump the gun here, I misread the "Scalito" part, shame on me, what an arse I am...



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

Quoting MidnightMike (Reply 2):
Amazing how CNN gets away with this crap, his nickname is actually, Scalito-Lite and he earned that nickname because he is considered a liberal-Scalito

Really, Mike? Here's the current front of http://www.foxnews.com

You notice on the headline of the story: "Senate Democrats already coming out against experienced judge nicknamed 'Scalito' for similarities to Justice Scalia; GOP solid in praise for nominee."

So don't turn it into a typical conservative CNN hate-fest. Fox said the same thing.

So, Bush's real nominee is a white, conservative male? Gee, how shocking. And if he's anywhere Scalia, he should be denied a post on the bench. Once again, Bush makes a choice only for a small portion of the U.S., not one that represents a majority of Americans.

Bush The Divider shows up again.


User currently offlineWhiteHatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

This looks like it could go two ways.

Either he'll get a bumpy but eventually successful confirmation, or there could even be another Miers type fracture in the Republican ranks. The howling extreme right might want to further flex their muscle and push for someone who is even further down the happy road.

Either way the endgame is nowhere in plain sight, as always happens when Turd Blossom is scripting the show. The pressure is now on the Democrats to fall into a pattern of passive resistance or have a really rabid third candidate shoved into the fray, as the current extreme wing of the Republicans will not accept any form of compromise. The new nominee could go through on a 'lesser of two evils' ticket.

The hearings should be interesting.


User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1403 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
Bush The Divider shows up again.

Common man, even you must see the set up here...


User currently offlineUsnseallt82 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 4891 posts, RR: 53
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
Once again, Bush makes a choice only for a small portion of the U.S., not one that represents a majority of Americans.

Last time I checked, white men are pretty popular in the U.S. and don't always follow the stereotype of only being concerned with themselves.  bigthumbsup 



Crye me a river
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

Alito isn't all that scary. And his opinions - even the very conservative ones - are a damned sight better and gracefully written than the rubbish that Scalia writes and that Cons. trot out as the zenith of judicial thought (more revisionist piffle, but I digress).

Yet, it appears that his nomination went through only after the Concerned Women of America (more like the Conservative Witches of America) blessed the nomination.

That having been said, his views in Casey will create a firestorm. He was the sole justice who believed that a spousal notification requirement be maintained in the Pennsylvania Abortion laws, EVEN if the wife had been a victim of spousal abuse.


User currently offlineMidnightMike From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2892 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1391 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
Really, Mike? Here's the current front of http://www.foxnews.com

Falcon

You are tooo late, I already attacked myself, HA!  Smile



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1386 times:

Quoting MidnightMike (Reply 11):
Falcon

You are tooo late, I already attacked myself, HA!

You did, didn't you.

Not used to looking for someone attacking THEMSELVES.

You're off the hook, then.  Wink


User currently offlineTPASXM787 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 20
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

From what I read he has a good bit of judiciary expereince, a big step up from Miers. The hearings should be interesting though I think that he will make it through. I hope he does as I think the next nominee will have drank even more kool-aid.


This is the Last Stop.
User currently offlineHalls120 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1384 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
So, Bush's real nominee is a white, conservative male? Gee, how shocking. And if he's anywhere Scalia, he should be denied a post on the bench. Once again, Bush makes a choice only for a small portion of the U.S., not one that represents a majority of Americans.

Bush The Divider shows up again.

This is what happens when you win an election, Falcon - you get to nominate people to the bench. Republicans usuall nominate conservatives, and Democrats usually nominate liberals. No big surprise there. While I would have liked to have seen Bush nominate a woman or a minority, in the end, what I care about most is that the nominee has the requisite experience and intellect to sit on the Supreme Court. Alito has already been confirmed for the Appellate Court, and unless there is something in his judicial record that suggests he is unfit for the Court, he should be confirmed.

We are likely going to have a democrat in the White House in 2009. Supreme Court justices are going to leave the Court, and that President will be able to nominate liberal jurists to fill those vacancies. What's the big deal?

Quoting WhiteHatter (Reply 7):
Either he'll get a bumpy but eventually successful confirmation, or there could even be another Miers type fracture in the Republican ranks. The howling extreme right might want to further flex their muscle and push for someone who is even further down the happy road.

It will be hard to fracture the republican party on this one. Alito isn't the most conservative choice Bush could have made, and Bush supposedly vetted Alito with the critics of Miers. I believe Alito was appointed to the Appeals Court by Bush 41 - making it hard for republicans to break ranks when the democrats threaten filibuster. And with regard to the latter, if Frist holds his ranks together, the democrats have a choice - filibuster the nomination and risk the republicans overriding the filibuster. Which they can do.


User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17353 posts, RR: 46
Reply 15, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1377 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
So, Bush's real nominee is a white, conservative male? Gee, how shocking.

Because we all know that Bush, who has more minorities in his cabinet than just about anyone ever, hates minorities  Yeah sure.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineHalls120 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1358 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 15):
se we all know that Bush, who has more minorities in his cabinet than just about anyone ever, hates minorities

And unlike his predecessors, Bush puts minorities and women in charge of the heavyweight cabinet posts like State, Justice, and Treasury. Not HUD, Transportation, or HHS, like his predecessors largely did.


User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1355 times:

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 14):
Alito isn't the most conservative choice Bush could have made, and Bush supposedly vetted Alito with the critics of Miers. I believe Alito was appointed to the Appeals Court by Bush 41 - making it hard for republicans to break ranks when the democrats threaten filibuster. And with regard to the latter, if Frist holds his ranks together, the democrats have a choice - filibuster the nomination and risk the republicans overriding the filibuster. Which they can do.

Alito was nominated by Bush 41, but this was before Alito became the sole dissenter in Planned Parenthood v Casey, in which he upheld the spousal consent provision (a rather broad provision that would have demanded that women, irrespective of spousal battery, separation, etc., notify their husbands of their intent to have an abortion). The Supreme Court knocked off this provision, in which they reviewed briefs that stated that 90% of all married women in PA made abortion decisions with their spouses, and that a majority of those who didn't did so because of fears of extreme spousal recrimination. Thus, the Supremes (as well as the Appellate court) found this requirement too burdensome.

There are at least 4 Republican Senators who will find Alito's Casey decision troubling - Snowe, Collins, Chaffee, Specter - may not vote to confirm him, or in the absence of that, they will certainly refrain from approving an end of the filibuster.

If Frist (who has his own problems) threatens to overthrow the filibuster, he will be basically hanging the GOP on this issue.


User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17353 posts, RR: 46
Reply 18, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1355 times:

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 16):
Bush puts minorities and women in charge of the heavyweight cabinet posts

Amen. I wonder what Falcon would say if he nominated Clarence Thomas part deux?



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineTPASXM787 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 20
Reply 19, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1347 times:

I agree with the above. To state that this is a nomination because he's a white male is ludicrous...but Bush doesn't like black people and he blew up the levee in NO remember?


This is the Last Stop.
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1339 times:

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 16):
And unlike his predecessors, Bush puts minorities and women in charge of the heavyweight cabinet posts like State, Justice, and Treasury. Not HUD, Transportation, or HHS, like his predecessors largely did.

As usual your understanding of which agencies are important is in the toilet, as are your facts.

Your crappy facts corrected
Madeleine Albright - Secretary of State under CLinton (FEMALE).
Janet Reno - Attorney General (FEMALE (we think  Smile)
John Snow and Paul O'Neill - Secretary of Treasury under GWB (both white males, and definitely not women or racial minorities).

Your crappy understanding of US Agencies corrected
HHS - the single most powerful domestic Agency in the United States controlling nearly 75% of all domestic products - human drugs and all foods for example. HHS never was, and is not, considered to be a "minor" agency, like DOT, for instance.


User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1334 times:

Quoting TPASXM787 (Reply 19):
To state that this is a nomination because he's a white male is ludicrous

I agree.
This nomination has nothing to do with the fact that Alito is a white male. If GWB and his ultra-con minions had their way, we would be seeing Janice Rodgers Brown as the nominee. The last time I checked, Justice Brown was neither white, nor male.


User currently offlineStlgph From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 9303 posts, RR: 25
Reply 22, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 16):
Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 15):
se we all know that Bush, who has more minorities in his cabinet than just about anyone ever, hates minorities

And unlike his predecessors, Bush puts minorities and women in charge of the heavyweight cabinet posts like State, Justice, and Treasury. Not HUD, Transportation, or HHS, like his predecessors largely did.

you all forget they are just secretaries.



Eternal darkness we all should dread. It's hard to party when you're dead.
User currently offlineHalls120 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1316 times:

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 20):
Quoting Halls120 (Reply 16):
And unlike his predecessors, Bush puts minorities and women in charge of the heavyweight cabinet posts like State, Justice, and Treasury. Not HUD, Transportation, or HHS, like his predecessors largely did.

As usual your understanding of which agencies are important is in the toilet, as are your facts.

Ah, just as I expected - Liberal spin. When it comes to issues of health, transportation, and housing, those cabinet agencies are indeed important. But when it comes to national defense, security, and finance issues, HHS, Transportation and HUD don't have much - if any - impact. And last time I checked the order of succession, I didn't see HUD, HHS, or Transportation near the top. By contrast, when the newly post of DHS Secretary was created, I do believe it was placed well above older Cabinet posts in that order.

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 20):
Your crappy facts corrected
Madeleine Albright - Secretary of State under CLinton (FEMALE).
Janet Reno - Attorney General (FEMALE (we think )
John Snow and Paul O'Neill - Secretary of Treasury under GWB (both white males, and definitely not women or racial minorities).

Where did I say Bush's predecessor NEVER appointed minorities and females to the more prestigious posts? I think it is YOU that needs to get your facts straight.

But since you want to talk numbers, let's. Clinton - one white woman - Albright - to State. No minorities. Bush - one black male, and one black female. Treasury - I do believe the current Secretary of the Treasury is a Hispanic male, and I don't remember Clinton appointing anyone other than a white male to that post. Justice - first Hispanic Attorney General. Yes, Clinton appointed a woman (what's with the snide comment about her sexuality - did you have a problem with it?) - a woman that was largely outside the Clinton inner circle the entire time she was in office.

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 20):
HHS - the single most powerful domestic Agency in the United States controlling nearly 75% of all domestic products - human drugs and all foods for example. HHS never was, and is not, considered to be a "minor" agency, like DOT, for instance.

 rotfl  This has to be one of the funniest things I've read on this board in a long time. Yes, HHS has an incredible impact on health and food issues. However, when they tangle with State on foreign policy issues relating to health, or Justice on legal issues relating to health, they invariably lose. I know, because I've been on the "winning" side of several of those internal debates.  biggrin 


User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8502 posts, RR: 12
Reply 24, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1305 times:

Such a shame, it could've been Janice Rogers Brown.

Oh wait, she actually knows and follows the Constitution, unlike this administration.


25 Jaysit : Cut the crap and your spin and get your own facts straight. Lawyers who lie about facts usually get FIRED from their posts. Lawyers who lie and then
26 Thumper3181 : And Lawyers who twist the facts are successful and rich. Lets face generally speaking lawyers come in somwhere between used car salesman and The New
27 Post contains images Pope : Not to split hairs but aren't men technically in the minority in the US. I thought out demographics gave women as slight edge in population. Therefor
28 WhiteHatter : I don't think you have managed to grasp the point I was putting up for discussion. Miers fractured the Republican front. There is every possibility t
29 Post contains images MaverickM11 : And then there are lawyers like Jaysit, that just spend 22 hours a day on airliners.net
30 Post contains images Superfly : CBS REPORTER TO WHITE HOUSE: ALITO 'SLOPPY SECONDS?' Mon Oct 31 2005 11:26:56 ET CBSNEWS Chief White House correspondent John Roberts described the Pr
31 Jaysit : Yes, but it is unlikely that a court more conservative than the existing one will defy stare decisis and overthrow some of the landmark cases. The cu
32 Jaysit : Oh look ! Mona's stalking me once again. And getting her numbers wrong. Poor Mona. Mona has problems with numbers. She thinks that her 3 inches are 8
33 Post contains images LTBEWR : Alito was chosen as to opinions he has written (including dissinting ones) on a number of criteria - here is the checklist Opposition to liberal acces
34 Pope : I don't think one judge will be enough, but I think that Alito & Roberts together along with a reinvigorated Scalia could from a good base to shift t
35 GuitrThree : Help me out here Falcon. Bush wins the election by over 4 million votes, and he appoints someone who represents, as you say, "only a small portion of
36 Halls120 : Oops, my bad - I was thinking of the Secretary of Commerce - who is a Hispanic, I believe. Where did I say "Clinton never nominated women to head Sta
37 Jaysit : That wasn't what you were called on. You were called on your incorrect statement. You stated this statement up on reply 16, that has not "supposedly
38 Halls120 : You are correct. But your response suggested that I was comparing Bush's record to only Clinton's, and that is simply NOT the case. You keep stating
39 Post contains images MaverickM11 : Um ok there chief ! The fact still remains that you're a "lawyer" and you're constantly in the top 10 posters here. I'd tell you to get a life but...
40 Cfalk : I would pull the guy's White House Press Corps pass for that. How disgustingly disrespectful... Spin any faster, and you will achieve liftoff!
41 B744F : Cool, lets just make up stuff!! Condy was appointed because she has an oil tanker named after her and is a friend in the corporate oil world. We all
42 Jaysit : Cut the crap. I just called you on an incorrect statement, and corrected you by providing you the only example of where one of GWB's predecessors app
43 Jaysit : You'd support the wholescale clamp down of freedom of the press if it shows your blessed Boy King to be the dimwitted liar he is. Alas, we still have
44 Post contains images MaverickM11 : I don't stalk people with STDs. Sorry. Maybe if you didn't take that last trip to the bath house I'd be interested. You're still a valid human being
45 Cfalk : Bull. If you will recall, I was among the first to say that Miers should be rejected. The White House Press Corps is on the front lines in one of the
46 Halls120 : In my original post, I did not single out Clinton by name, and your response which included Clinton could certainly be read to suggest I was comparin
47 Post contains images MaverickM11 : No surprises there
48 Jaysit : Me thinks the lady doth protest too much. Given that Clinton was the only predecessor of GWB who actually appointed women to State and Justice, your
49 Post contains images We're Nuts :
50 Texan : Alright, getting back to the original posting about Judge Alito... It is safe to say I'm concerned about Alito. I could care less about personal polit
51 SFOMEX : The fact is that Mr. Bush made quite clear during the last campaign the kind of Justices he prefers: the like of Scalia and Thomas. Having that in min
52 Post contains images ANCFlyer : Gotta you here Bubba . . . your attempt to bring race into this ain't gonna fly. Please, check the rest of PotUS appointments and get back to me on t
53 Post contains images We're Nuts :
54 Post contains images ANCFlyer : That's it? No lengthy diatribe? No nonsensical commentary? No inane oratory that will leave us all speechless? Are you or ? Well, there is a God afte
55 Post contains images We're Nuts : Actually you're right, it's the latter. But I can still spot . Senators have the right to block whomever they want. It doesn't make them "damned" or
56 Post contains images ANCFlyer : I quite agree with you . . . My concern is - once again - the ultra-partisan politics on Capitol Hill. Not one democrat that is perhaps sitting at ho
57 Cfalk : I agree about the hard questions. Go ahead and ask those all you want. But "sloppy seconds" is not a hard question. That was a disparaging remark, an
58 Post contains images Halls120 : You are correct. Your comment indicated she might be male. I stand corrected. So - tell us, what does that have to do with anything we've been debati
59 MidnightMike : *Ahem*, need I remind you that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was voted in easily during the Clinton Administration..... Also, Justice Gin
60 Post contains links TPASXM787 : I really see the nomintaion flying right through the more I read about it...a sample: http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wi...6.story?coll=ny-region-ap
61 Falcon84 : Because White was more a moderate, not a conservative. He was picked by President Kennedy back in the 60's. Often, you'll also find, when a president
62 Halls120 : White was indeed a moderate during his later years, but he was never as liberal as Ginsburg. Yet no one raised the issue then, so why do we hear the
63 Falcon84 : Sanity, yes, but I have to admit, there's some political calculation behind this as well. With Bush and the GOP severely on the ropes on the eve of t
64 Dvk : I agree that, unless Alito Borks himself in the hearings, he needs to be allowed confirmation by the Senate. That does NOT mean that the Dems should v
65 Post contains images Falcon84 : I agree. If you want to vote against him, fine. That's their right, and that would be a better way, I think, than taking the chance with a backlash f
66 Jaysit : Then you need to go back to Law School and take Writing 101. LOL. Who are you trying to fool here? There was but one predecessor who did so. Your def
67 Falcon84 : He most certainly was a moderate. He was center-right. That makes him moderate.
68 Post contains images Halls120 : There were many predecessors who had the opportunity to appoint women and minorities to first tier posts. They didn't. That was the point I was makin
69 We're Nuts : I have faith that there aren't any Democrats who do want to vote for this guy. Why can't this president, just once, do something that would be praise
70 WhiteHatter : So anyway...are they saying Alito is a conservative or a Conservative? There's a difference. A huge difference. A conservative Justice would wish to e
71 Halls120 : Evidently, quite a few of them voted to confirm him to the appellate bench. What has he done since to merit losing those votes?
72 We're Nuts : It's all about being the right person for a very important job.
73 TPASXM787 : Very deep thoughts, just like this: When he was unanimously voted to the appellate bench? Obviously they voted for him then...
74 We're Nuts : I think someone applying to the USSC requires a tad more scrutiny than the lower courts.
75 Post contains links AeroWesty : For those who prefer not to have things predigested for them by the likes of CNN, Fox, et al - The All Things Alito page, that will be updated over th
76 Jaysit : What do you mean? He established a whole new record as an appellate judge. His dissent in Casey as an appellate judge is already creating a problem i
77 Halls120 : So what has be done to merit your vote as being unqualified? Exactly. And that is what he should be judged on. But as I noted above, the OP didn't st
78 Post contains images ANCFlyer : I'm not convinced that PotUS could do anything to be praised by the democrats today . . . the ultra-partisanship on both sides of the aisle will prev
79 Dan-Air : Your assertion that there exists some unity among the Democratic party is heartening to this partisan liberal - but unfortunately the evidence provid
80 Post contains images ANCFlyer : And of course we disagree . . . there's a surprise . . . That said, I see your point. I do however think they are more galvanized than you believe .
81 Post contains images Usnseallt82 : While the dems may have their own squabbles on the side with lesser issues, you'd be hard pressed to find any of them breaking from the pack when it
82 Post contains links B2707SST : Incorrect. An exception for women who feared spousal reprisal was included in the statute and noted by Alito in his dissent: The plaintiffs failed to
83 B744F : -democrats +republicans = never ending cycle
84 B744F : You can just hear his words as he writes them, so fearful of giving women any sort of power. He would make a great Conservative Supreme Court judge,
85 Post contains images B2707SST : Oh please Needless to say, the plight of any women, no matter how few, who may suffer physical abuse or other harm as a result of this provision is a
86 Post contains links Slider : I would disagree. In fact, on that heated topic of abortion, it's a mixed bag. He has, in fact, ruled on the case at hand, taking that into appropria
87 B744F : If you've read any briefs of the past when upholding discrimination laws, slavery, etc. They all threw that type of sentence in there
88 Slider : **Chirp, chirp, SCOTUS chirp**
89 Jaysit : I think we just have to wait and see how Alito explains his Casey dissent.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Twenty-one Reasons Why Bush Will Win...Revisited posted Fri Nov 5 2004 21:15:46 by Techrep
Twenty-one Reasons Why Bush Will Win posted Tue Oct 19 2004 12:07:43 by Techrep
Who Thinks G.W. Bush Will Be Re-elected? posted Tue Aug 13 2002 03:58:46 by 767-332ER
Bush: I Will Not Meet Arafat posted Thu Nov 8 2001 20:51:05 by LY772
"Climate Change Will Destroy Us"-Pentagon To Bush posted Tue Aug 8 2006 15:01:04 by NWDC10
Will Bush's Successor Raise Taxes To Cut Deficit? posted Thu Jul 6 2006 15:32:37 by Bmacleod
Plame Investigation: Will "Bush's Brain" Get Off? posted Tue Jun 13 2006 14:12:41 by AerospaceFan
Who Will Be The Next Bush Staffer To Leave? posted Fri Apr 21 2006 00:44:41 by Bushpilot
George Bush's SOU Speech Will Be Bumped For Hockey posted Wed Feb 1 2006 01:57:16 by L-188
Do You Think Alito Will Be Confirmed? posted Sun Jan 8 2006 20:38:01 by AerospaceFan