Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bill O'Reilly "al-Qaida Can Wipe SFO Off The Map"  
User currently offlineAirTran737 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3704 posts, RR: 12
Posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3120 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10004302/

Just posting the news, not saying anything, because I don't feel like being flamed for the next week


Nice Trip Report!!! Great Pics, thanks for posting!!!! B747Forever
109 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17439 posts, RR: 46
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3104 times:

"Why should the rest of the country protect your butt, with all due respect, OK, when it comes to the war on terror, if San Francisco is going to thumb your nose and give the big digit to the military? Why should ... why should we protect you from al-Qaida and terrorists if you're going to disrespect the military, by passing this ... even though it's symbolic ... this resolution?"

He has a point.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineZeekiel From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3092 times:

I don't blame San Franciscans for feeling this way.

But ignore it, I am going to visit San Francisco. I would rather visit San Francisco than have the pleasure of meeting his ilk.

His comments were unfounded as it had to do with military recruiters being in schools not in the city itself. It was a democratic vote and the mood of the majority was felt. Nothing bad about that.

If he feels the need to fight and defend, he should get a tin hat and a gun. And be sent off to the war. .

Cheers

Zeekiel

[Edited 2005-11-11 23:46:42]

User currently offlineSFOMEX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3091 times:

He is rightfully mad at the nuts in SFO who passed this proposition, but once again Mr. O'Reilly goes ballistic showing what an idiot he can be.

San Francisco, Mr. O'Reilly, is one of the greatest cities in the whole word. Even if you don't agree with them, its people are Americans too. Mr O'Reilly, you are an a**hole!


User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12090 posts, RR: 49
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3091 times:

Well on a plus note, at least the gays are not to blame for this one.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineLentigomaligna From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3088 times:

What a moron. 1. They ARE San Francisco Schools and 2. Even though he is obviously joking, what a stupid thing to say for someone so "patriotic".

User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3088 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 1):
He has a point.

 checkmark 

I think the people of SFO have embarrased themselves a lot more than Oreilly did with his remarks.




-NWA742


User currently offlineGreasespot From Canada, joined Apr 2004, 3079 posts, RR: 20
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3087 times:

Because part of what used to make America great was the tolerated difference of opinions and still being Americans....That is why it is wrong.

If you do not fall lock step in behind the Bush Whitehouse you are some how less American...

GS



Sometimes all you can do is look them in the eye and ask " how much did your mom drink when she was pregnant with you?"
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17439 posts, RR: 46
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3085 times:

Quoting Greasespot (Reply 7):
Because part of what used to make America great was the tolerated difference of opinions and still being Americans....That is why it is wrong.

So you aren't tolerating O'Reilly's opinion?



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineGreasespot From Canada, joined Apr 2004, 3079 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3075 times:

No I am not tolerating it.....but being a commie pinko and from Canuckistan. My opinion does not really matter now does it....BUt I gave it anyway...


 Smile

GS



Sometimes all you can do is look them in the eye and ask " how much did your mom drink when she was pregnant with you?"
User currently offlineLentigomaligna From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3075 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 8):
So you aren't tolerating O'Reilly's opinion?

At least she's not saying it's ok for an assassin to target O'Reilly if he wants.


User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3069 times:

Quoting SFOMEX (Reply 3):
He is rightfully mad at the nuts in SFO who passed this proposition, but once again Mr. O'Reilly goes ballistic showing what an idiot he can be.

He does bring up a good point, but you're correct -- he did go way beyond what's approapriate with the "And if al-Qaida comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it." kind of crap.




-NWA742


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7408 posts, RR: 50
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3066 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AirTran737 (Thread starter):
Just posting the news, not saying anything, because I don't feel like being flamed for the next week

He was speaking in the context that the lib politicians in the City of San Francisco want military recruitment blocked from high schools. He then suggested that gov't say "Ok, you don't want to help us defend the country, then we won't defend the City of San Francisco."

Quote from the Radio Factor:O'REILLY: Hey, you know, if you want to ban military recruiting, fine, but I'm not going to give you another nickel of federal money. You know, if I'm the president of the United States, I walk right into Union Square, I set up my little presidential podium, and I say, "Listen, citizens of San Francisco, if you vote against military recruiting, you're not going to get another nickel in federal funds. Fine. You want to be your own country? Go right ahead."

And if Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead.


From the article:
"according to a transcript and audio posted by liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America, and by the San Francisco Chronicle."

This is all you need to read, to know that this is a targeted swipe at O'Reilly. Media Matters and MSNBC, no surprise to see this from them.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineBHMBAGLOCK From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2698 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3062 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 1):
He has a point.

Remember though that there are also a lot of normal people in the Bay area mixed in with the granola.

I do hope that all fed funding for schools in the area is cut off if this silly referendum is indeed implemented.



Where are all of my respected members going?
User currently offlineLentigomaligna From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3054 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 12):
"Ok, you don't want to help us defend the country, then we won't defend the City of San Francisco."

Maybe San Fran sees a difference between what our military does and defending our country.  stirthepot 


User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3047 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 1):
"Why should the rest of the country protect your butt, with all due respect, OK, when it comes to the war on terror, if San Francisco is going to thumb your nose and give the big digit to the military? Why should ... why should we protect you from al-Qaida and terrorists if you're going to disrespect the military, by passing this ... even though it's symbolic ... this resolution?"

He has a point.

He does?

Lets put it this way, Bill O'Reilly and you never protected the US from anything. Lily-livered cowards don't have the cajones to do so.

San Francisco's excellent academic, legal, culinary and business institutions have done more for the United States than that obnoxious, sexually harassing dimwit and all his numerous cowardly apologists combined.

Pathological sisses masquerading as bullies. All of them.


User currently offlineSlider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6799 posts, RR: 34
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3032 times:

Providing for the national defense is one of those "indivisible" things that cannot be handled by any singular entity other than the Federal government.

I think the SFO schools should be OBLIGATED to allow recruiters.

But nothing that the left bay does surprises me anymore.


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7408 posts, RR: 50
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3030 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Lentigomaligna (Reply 14):
Maybe San Fran sees a difference between what our military does and defending our country.

It doesn't matter how they see "defending the country", Allowing military recruitment is one of the requirments for federal-funding. Without it the federal gov't doesn't have to San Francisco City School System any money. So good on them, hoe they have the coffers filled.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineSFOMEX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3024 times:

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 15):
Lily-livered cowards don't have the cajones to do so.

It's cojones. Cajones are drawers.


User currently offlineLentigomaligna From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3017 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 17):
Allowing military recruitment is one of the requirments for federal-funding.

I guess they lose it then don't they, that's their decision to make. It's too bad that the focus isn't on the quality of the schools rather than whether or not the military can use schools to recruit fresh troops for a disaster of a war. I was just pointing out that this type of logic is faulty:

Quoting ,reply=12:
"Ok, you don't want to help us defend the country, then we won't defend the City of San Francisco."


[Edited 2005-11-12 00:11:24]

User currently offlinePacificjourney From New Zealand, joined Jul 2001, 2732 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3004 times:

I'm amazed.

Reading this forum one gets the impression that the US military is The best job in the world and that the prime of america just beat down the door to join.

Who would have thought they even needed recruiters to troll the malls and high schools for the otherwise unemployable ?

The Army, we're looking for guys who don't read the papers much ....



" Help, help ... I'm being oppressed ... "
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20533 posts, RR: 62
Reply 21, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2983 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 12):
From the article:
"according to a transcript and audio posted by liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America, and by the San Francisco Chronicle."

This is all you need to read, to know that this is a targeted swipe at O'Reilly. Media Matters and MSNBC, no surprise to see this from them.

Also from the article:

"Adding to the buzz was the archived version of O'Reilly's Tuesday show, which omitted the incendiary comments, according to Bay Area TV station KNTV."



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13078 posts, RR: 12
Reply 22, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2976 times:

The problem is that the military should not be given such open access to impressionable, lower income high school aged students or their personal info.
High School students are highly impressionable so recruters will play up the money you can get for college (a BIG attention getter for many H.S. students anywhere) life experience, work skills and maturity you gain, but with bearly any discussion of the downside - that you may get killed in Iraq. Second, is the issue of privacy.
Many indivduals, including the parents of these children don't want the government to know any more about me then they absolutly need, including the military.
For many in S.F. in particular, it is about the anti-gay/lesbian polices of the military they find objectionable and this is a route of protest of those policies. That is what probably pisses off BO'R. Still, the people of S.F. do have sound reasoning and really should have the right to limit recruting access to their public school students. S.F. no matter what their politics also needs the full measure of protection from our military or any other part of government despite their recruting program objections.


User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 23
Reply 23, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2956 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 12):
From the article:
"according to a transcript and audio posted by liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America, and by the San Francisco Chronicle."

Media Matters is nothing but a bunch of George Soros funded left wing hacks to take comments conservatives, or in the case of O'Reilly, perceived conservatives, and twist them to suit their left wing agenda. This is the same group that got the media in a stir over Bill Bennett by send out a press release claiming he wanted to abort all black children when he ever said any such thing but by using only a couple of phrases, MM made it sound that way.



"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineThorben From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2953 times:

Quote:
"And if al-Qaida comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco.

So, this moron says it's OK if San Francisco gets destroyed, all it's inhabitants killed, because they do not want military recruiters in their schools??? And some people think he has a point??? The military's recent actions are not protecting the US, they are creating more hatred in the Islamic countries, therefore endangering America even further.

Quote:
City officials were not amused. "It sounds like he's on the same medication Rush Limbaugh is addicted to, and he should go see a therapist,'' Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin, whose district includes the tower, told the Chronicle.

Although I'm pro-free-speech, I agree with this part. O'Reilly should have his head examined.


25 BHMBAGLOCK : Personally, I'd rather give them access than the leftist teacher's union drones who have them 7 hours a day more or less. If you don't think they're
26 AeroWesty : Interesting way of attempting to explain away why this part of O'Rielly's show isn't part of the official transcript.
27 Gilligan : Actually recruiting was up for the month of October.
28 MaverickM11 : What Bill or I do or don't do has nothing to do with this. If an entity votes to prohibit the institution that protects it, it leaves itself open to
29 AeroWesty : That's true, but 12% (instead of the goal of less than 4%) were "Category 4" recruits, from the Delayed Entry Program pool, whose entrance test score
30 Santosdumont : It's interesting to note that both this O'Reilly gem and the other one about hurricanes and UN headquarters were on his radio show. Looks like he's ju
31 Jetjack74 : I'm tempted to subscibe to his website to see if it actually is removed. I'm skeptical of (Spin)Media Matters and the SFC of their testimony. If it's
32 Lowrider : I wonder if the recruiters could make the case that this violates thier 1st ammendment rights. Since the schools are tax dollar funded, can they be co
33 Itsjustme : I couldn't care less about what some egotistical blow hard says on a TV show in order to score some ratings. The fact that our military recruiters hav
34 Post contains links Jetjack74 : Beginning 2 years ago, Army recruiters were chased off the campus of Seattle Central Community College. THey were threatened by antiwar protesters ht
35 Falcon84 : He has no point. If someone says that, and they're earnest about it, that's inciting terrorism, and I imagine punishible by jail time or worse. So th
36 AeroWesty : This is actually an interesting argument that's being played out, especially since it's usually the 9th Circuit that's accused of wingnuttery. The 3r
37 Post contains links and images AeroWesty : Welcome to Beijing, Falcon! http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...archive/2005/03/02/MNGRMBITPF1.DTL The No Child Left Behind Act approved by Congre
38 NWA742 : Who would these certain people be? I know not to ask about the political persuasion. I think you're mistaking the idea that the military is "holier-t
39 Falcon84 : Respect for those who serve is fine, NWA742. It's warrented. But this attitude that the schools should be OBLIGATED to let recruiters in? The notion
40 NWA742 : Why, may I ask, is it just totally nuts to you? It' If it's a benefit for the military to have, then it's probably a benefit for the country. Who giv
41 Falcon84 : It just is! You honestly think it should be mandated that schools are OBLIGED to let the military in? Why? That's just crazy. And again, the military
42 NWA742 : Ok. Yes, I do. I don't see a problem with it. They are not forcing anybody to join, but they are making it easier for those who would like too. What
43 Jetjack74 : It may not be unpatiotic or disrespectful, but it is preventing the US Armed Forces from the opportunity to recruit which they have a right to do in
44 Falcon84 : Sorry, but such sentiment scare the shit out of me, that you would, in a free society, FORCE any entity to suffer the presence of the military in any
45 Post contains images NWA742 : -NWA742
46 Falcon84 : Tranlation: you don't kiss the military's ass, then you're whole city will suffer. How very USSR of you, JetJack.
47 NWA742 : "Suffer" the presence of the military? Okay, there's the basis to which our opinions differ, BIG TIME. I think it's crazy to think that having the mi
48 Falcon84 : That's because you put the military on a much higher pedestal than I do. I think the military should ask if it can recruit. If an entity, like school
49 Stirling : I am sorry sir, you cannot have it both ways....the *Military* are the *Volunteers*...you cannot separate the two, it is like saying you love taking
50 Falcon84 : Excuse me, sir, but I'm not having it both ways. I do not like the fact of the institution of armed forces. That doesn't mean I cannot have the utmos
51 Jetjack74 : You are such a class act. What joke you are. It's not kissing the military's ass. It's payback for federal dollars. You think money grows on trees? T
52 Falcon84 : ROTFL. And that's saying, politely "kiss ass, or kiss off." I stand by what I say, JetJack. I guess you lose the argument, if that's the best you can
53 NWA742 : Damn straight. Well, in my view, they have every right to set up recruiting offices where they want. For everything that they accomplish for this cou
54 Post contains images Falcon84 : American soldiers have fought and died for 200 years, not for the right to recruit where they want, but to give us the right, as a free people, to te
55 Jetjack74 : I guess nobody but you cares. If calling people communists is what you call victory, then you are the victorious I don't doubt it. You loathe the mil
56 Falcon84 : Amazing how you transpose the fact that I loath the idea of forcing communities to have recruiters at schools with somehow loathing the military. I d
57 NWA742 : I'm not disputing that, Falcon, and I'm in no way, asking to deny the rights of citizens to voice their opinions. However, I stand by my belief that
58 KC135R : Don't forget that 60% of the "lib" population voted for it - so, agree with it or not, it is the will of the majority in SFO and therefore well withi
59 Jetjack74 : Oh please, if you backpeddle any quicker, you'll trip over that stick up the orfice.
60 Falcon84 : There's a huge difference between being allowed to bitch, and being allowed to administer the affairs of your own community. The military does not ha
61 Post contains images ANCFlyer : OK, up front, O'Reilly is a nut job . . . that said: Other than Superfly, I haven't ever identified one . . . and 'Fly can occasionally be suspect wit
62 NWA742 : And the communities have no rights to do whatever they want their own way, either. In fact, I don't recall any "community rights" by our founding fat
63 MDorBust : O'reilly's a blowhard, and the people of SF are being twits. The government should pull all federal funding from the schools and all defense related c
64 Stlgph : you both are jokes.
65 BHMBAGLOCK : 1. We need a grammar check more than a spell check. 2. If the leftist teachers' indoctrination can't survive a couple of hours exposure to a couple o
66 Post contains images NWA742 : That's all you got? What am I supposed to say back? SO ARE YOU!..........................???????????   Sorry pal, I think the people of SFO who have
67 Falcon84 : I beg your pardon, but they absolutely do. Would you like it if some entity came into your town, NWA742, and told you "we know you've told us you don
68 KC135R : Agreed - well within the rights of the fed gov't to do if they so choose, since it's their money we're talking about - well our money, but that's ano
69 Stlgph : no, you are the joke. you're supporting a person who said it's ok for terrorists to wipe the city off the map. and to think you're trying to quote th
70 Jetjack74 : Did you read what I said futher down: I don't think the guy really wants San Francisco to be hit with a terror attack, no clear-thinking individual d
71 NWA742 : No they don't. Can people group together as a community with a goal of destroying something like the military? No, they cannot, they do not have that
72 MDorBust : Based off of the assumption that the populace of SF that voted on the measure are the same people that operate and/or own the buisnesses in question.
73 MaverickM11 : OMG a liberal just acknowledged the army is a volunteer force. Hell must have frozen over.
74 NWA742 : Really? Read one of the first replies, I said: That's not supporting him, jackass. And to think that I'm wasting time talking to a fucktard like you.
75 Jetjack74 : I salute that. Amen(ophh, can't say that. Might piss-off the ACLU)[Edited 2005-11-12 08:19:40]
76 Stlgph : Maybe the policies are different now, but I remember after taking the ASVAB test in high school and not having a choice in doing so, I was bombarded
77 Post contains images Falcon84 : Maybe you would, but i wouldn't. I'd fight it, peacably, with every means I could. I wouldn't take it sitting down, not ever. If my community says it
78 MaverickM11 : What??? Where is that written? What about people that would "appreciate evolution not being taught" at a school?
79 KC135R : Yes, but it's not you I disagree with - it's O'Reilly. But you seem intent on justifying what he said, probably because you are a loyal fan, and what
80 ANCFlyer : Well fuck the ACLU too . . . .
81 Stlgph : you're on his side. that's support. remember, FanofBush, "if you're not with me, you are against me" and i went full ride Ivy League. which means i c
82 Nosedive : Heh, since when are you an expert on SFO's education system? Gotta love how the 1st Amendment is often interpreted to mean "I have a right to speak,
83 ANCFlyer : And I specified as much earlier - I disagree with giving information to the military . . . . always have. If Tommy(or Tammy) wants that information m
84 Jetjack74 : Whether i'm a fan or not is irrelevant. That would have nothing to do with my answer. If he was to intentionally say something inflamatory, I would p
85 Post contains images MattCLE : @ Bill O'Reilly San Francisco needn't worry, the last thing al-Qaida wants to deal with are a bunch of angry queens -Matt
86 Pacificjourney : Can't see why the US army would want to recruit there much anyway, surely they do much better in their traditional hunting grounds of marginalised , l
87 ANCFlyer : Blah, Blah, Blah . . . don't you have some outrageous tax bill to pay?
88 Clipperhawaii : I wrote of San Francisco voters and their local government long ago. Let them vote as they wish. When's the next earthquake or fire? Hmmm that sounds
89 KC135R : This is what I read, linked from the Drudge Report: He advised President George W. Bush to react by withdrawing any military protection for the city.
90 Pacificjourney : Yes I do and frankly I'm sick of so much of it being used for psuedo-welfare like the army and made up public servant positions for ex-army people wh
91 Post contains images ANCFlyer : Wel, I'm at home, off duty, so you're WRONG again, as usual. Other than that . . . Blah, blah, blah, your continuous inane bullshit posts are old, bo
92 NoUFO : Isn't that stupendous? They did not vote against military recruitment in general but only against military recruiters at school. I understand that. I
93 Pacificjourney : Oh no, the dog shit must be mounting up in your abscence ... whose enforcing those pooper laws without you around ?
94 Stlgph : in the end...exactly. it's just going to inspire a whole new clothing line from Dolce & Gabbana: Backyard Batallion Wear
95 Post contains links AeroWesty : Well you know who's on the 3rd Circuit that decided the case on the Solomon Amendment, none other than Judge Alito! I haven't been able to find if he
96 BHMBAGLOCK : They're definitely a minority, quiet one too. There's actually a very successful YR club at Berkely now if you can believe it. OTOH, I don't think th
97 GuitrThree : First off, O'Reilly did go over the top with his comments. I personally think this is nothing more than a ratings stunt, but with him, you never know.
98 Post contains links AeroWesty : If it were that simple, I'd actually support it. The military is without a doubt a viable, honorable career for many people. The problem is that curr
99 Mdsh00 : Very true. I remember checking off a box when I took the PSAT years ago. Honestly, the problem is that many people don't know about it. I don't knock
100 Post contains images Jetjack74 : He's not hoping that will happen. It's not stupid at all. It's just as valid as any other comparison on here. What's ridiculous is the intent behind
101 Post contains links and images JeffSFO : Great attitude. Judge not, lest ye be judged. Honestly, have you ever spent any significant amount of time in SF other than visiting the local touris
102 ANCFlyer : Thanks - I thought the comment appropriate. Yes . . .and MRY and SJC and SMF . . . You're preaching to the wrong person here JeffSFO. I never said an
103 AeroWesty : Because it's gone further than a card table. I was surprised myself to read and hear about how far the recruiters have gone these days, especially af
104 NWA742 : I'm sorry but I still don't understand this attitude, Falcon. Your "community" doesn't have any granted rights over the government. You have individu
105 Post contains images BMIFlyer : Isn't it about time we wiped Al Qaida off the map? I hope to see that happen during my lifetime..... Lee
106 Jetjack74 : So does the rest of us.
107 Itsjustme : I think the difference is we are invited into schools to talk about the law enforcement profession, to give the students some insight, and to answer
108 JeffSFO : Cute. And you've never identified a normal person in your time in SF? That's either extraordinarily narrow minded or you didn't get out much, so that
109 Post contains images NWA742 : Neither have I. -
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
O'Reilly: "Al Jazeera Is A Terrorist Organization" posted Tue Oct 26 2004 03:51:48 by EA CO AS
Bill O'Reilly And The Malmedy Massacre posted Sun Jun 11 2006 17:02:55 by AirCop
Bill O'Reilly, The Big Bully posted Sat Mar 11 2006 06:46:44 by Tbar220
Iranian Leader: Israel To Be "Wiped Off The Map" posted Wed Oct 26 2005 14:49:51 by JetMaster
Bill O'Reilly Does It Again, Pulls A "Robertson" posted Thu Oct 6 2005 00:55:51 by Tbar220
"You Can Forget About Meeting The President" posted Sat Aug 28 2004 20:40:49 by Whitehatter
Why Is Bill O'Reilly Sour? posted Thu Nov 9 2006 23:22:28 by CometII
Al-Qaida Plotted Ashes Gas Attack posted Mon Oct 9 2006 00:42:35 by VHVXB
California Has Really Gone Off The Deep End. posted Wed Sep 20 2006 21:07:18 by Cfalk
No Saddam, Al-Qaida Link posted Fri Sep 8 2006 23:34:12 by A332