Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/photography_feedback/read.main/368156/

Topic: Need To Improve Acceptance Percentage...help Me Pl
Username: AirMalta
Posted 2012-10-31 10:13:46 and read 631 times.

Guys maybe you can help me to increase my acceptance rate since with 2183 photo on the database my skills deteriorated apparently as currently 28% ...

http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo337/QUID59/SAUDIA_MALTAPICS_MALTA_DEPT_13SEPT.jpg

http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo337/QUID59/RAF_MONDAY_DEPT_MALTA_AIRHSOW.jpg

Topic: RE: Need To Improve Acceptance Percentage...help Me Pl
Username: vikkyvik
Posted 2012-10-31 10:35:45 and read 624 times.

Those photos are too small to comment on quality issues. But for motive issues, on the MD-11 I would crop in farther on the right side of the photo, and on the C-17 the engine is cut off on the right, and it looks mostly backlit. The tail is cut off too - not sure if that would be a problem.

Topic: RE: Need To Improve Acceptance Percentage...help Me Pl
Username: FYODOR
Posted 2012-10-31 10:38:45 and read 622 times.

Mate, with my 2471 I got 17 rejections from 19 photos. Might be it is a paradox and our skills are distructing with greater experience. Might be we simply have too much photos already.  

Fyodor

[Edited 2012-10-31 10:41:01]

Topic: RE: Need To Improve Acceptance Percentage...help Me Pl
Username: AirMalta
Posted 2012-10-31 12:50:17 and read 579 times.

I will post them large again tomorrow as i have uploaded them on on photobucket thanks anyway

Topic: RE: Need To Improve Acceptance Percentage...help Me Pl
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2012-10-31 12:52:56 and read 577 times.

Quoting AirMalta (Thread starter):
my acceptance rate since with 2183 photo on the database my skills deteriorated apparently as currently 28% ...

With all due respect, if you have that many photos on the database, you should be abe to see why these two examples aren't up to the standard required for the database. As vikkyvik mentioned, the lighting on the C17 is your main problem although the MD11 isn't too bad, it might be salvagable with a good edit but it looks noisy and the contrast is way off.

Darren


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/