http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/photography_feedback/read.main/367995/
Username: Epten
Posted 2012-10-23 12:47:35 and read 693 times.
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2012-10-23 13:05:55 and read 686 times.
Epten,
It looks soft in places, oversharp in others, but mainly soft on my screen. How sharp was the original? There's some chromatic aberration as well. Be careful with the noise. I wouldn't say there's too much, but it's borderline for here.
Darren
Username: vikkyvik
Posted 2012-10-23 20:31:16 and read 669 times.
Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 1):
It looks soft in places, oversharp in others
Same here, which usually leads me to believe it may have been a bit blurry.
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-24 12:05:27 and read 642 times.
The aberration Darren points out is a pretty good indication that your lens wasn't quite up to the task, either you were shooting at the extreme end of its range, or it was relatively wide open, which would account for the noticeable softness/blur. If that's not the case, the overall quality of the lens might just not be up to par.
Username: Epten
Posted 2012-10-25 05:29:15 and read 607 times.
Yes, it was shot at maximum zoom and maximum aperture.
How about this one:
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-25 06:55:26 and read 599 times.
Quoting Epten (Reply 4):
How about this one:
This image is below the minimum size, so can't say anything about quality.
Username: Epten
Posted 2012-10-25 09:52:54 and read 585 times.
Low in frame and oversharpened?
[Edited 2012-10-25 09:55:30]
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2012-10-25 11:25:41 and read 577 times.
Quoting Epten (Reply 6):
Low in frame and oversharpened?
Are you asking if they are correct rejection reasons or for pre-screening? The aircraft isn't low in the frame for me, it's correctly centred and doesn't look oversharp on my screen.
Darren
Username: epten
Posted 2012-10-25 11:32:20 and read 576 times.
I am asking for pre-screening, about things I am not sure about, like center and sharpen in the last example.
Thank you for your feedback!
Username: epten
Posted 2012-10-26 07:11:51 and read 557 times.
Yet another: is it oversharpened and low in frame. Any other issues?
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-26 08:27:01 and read 549 times.
Quoting epten (Reply 9):
is it oversharpened and low in frame. Any other issues?
Maybe a touch low, but the bigger problem is the tail is blurry.
Username: epten
Posted 2012-10-26 09:26:51 and read 543 times.
Quoting dlowwa (Reply 10):
Maybe a touch low, but the bigger problem is the tail is blurry.
Thank you for your response! Do you mean the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer?
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-26 14:15:05 and read 518 times.
Quoting epten (Reply 11):
Do you mean the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer?
No, the whole tail is either blurry, or very, very soft.
Username: epten
Posted 2012-11-05 04:45:02 and read 455 times.
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-05 06:56:34 and read 455 times.
Quoting epten (Reply 13):
Any hope for this one?
Not too bad, just slightly oversharpened/noisy. I don't see why you wouldn't be able to fix it up.
Username: frado
Posted 2012-11-08 11:25:38 and read 455 times.
Could one please help me here?
http://smtp.airliners.net/addphotos/...106_l1351468217.97350495_4934b.jpg
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2012-11-08 11:44:37 and read 455 times.
Quoting frado (Reply 15):
Could one please help me here?
Great shot, I love the angle but it's oversharpened. How sharp was the original? Motion blur can be difficult to avoid at that angle if your shutter speed isn't pretty fast so I suspect there's a little blurriness in the original and you've have to apply a lot of sharpening?
Darren
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-08 11:52:33 and read 455 times.
Quoting frado (Reply 15):
Could one please help me here?
You should probably start your own thread.
Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/