Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/photography_feedback/read.main/368681/

Topic: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: monsoon84
Posted 2012-11-21 14:27:52 and read 775 times.

This photo was rejected for being overexposed and soft.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...120_x1352846501.6141dsc_0114v4.jpg

After edit..

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/r1353535675.969dsc_0114v5.jpg

How does it look now? Any help would be great.  


Thanks,
Monsoon84

[Edited 2012-11-21 14:30:04]

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: DL747
Posted 2012-11-21 14:37:17 and read 765 times.

Looks better, but I still think it has severe quality issues.

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2012-11-21 14:39:26 and read 764 times.

Quoting monsoon84 (Thread starter):
How does it look now?

It looks like the original was a little blurry so I don't think this will have the quaity to recover it. It's still borderline overexposed and doesn't have the quality. It looks like you've had to apply a lot of sharpening to compensate, particularly towards the front of the aircraft, but it's still soft and oversharpened.

Darren

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: monsoon84
Posted 2012-11-21 23:35:36 and read 738 times.

Ok thanks for the feed back...
I have one more question.

Will this photo be rejected due to the red FOD can?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/d1353569641.28dsc_0199v1.jpg


Thanks,
Monsoon84

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: vikkyvik
Posted 2012-11-22 00:43:19 and read 735 times.

Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 3):
Will this photo be rejected due to the red FOD can?

I don't think so, given that it looks like a pretty unavoidable obstruction, but I'm not positive.

However, the photo looks soft, a bit dark, and low on contrast.

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: monsoon84
Posted 2012-11-22 10:46:40 and read 712 times.

Do you think the photo is salvageable if i sharpen, and increase the contrast?

Thanks,
Monsoon84

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-22 14:16:48 and read 695 times.

Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 5):
Do you think the photo is salvageable

With a better edit, it might have a chance.

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: monsoon84
Posted 2012-11-24 01:14:01 and read 651 times.

I worked on fixing it. What do you think about the contrast and sharpness?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/90432686@N06/8212487279/lightbox/

Thanks,
Monsoon84

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-24 08:59:26 and read 636 times.

Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 7):
What do you think about the contrast and sharpness?

They look better, but do you have an angle where the fire extinguisher isn't blocking anything? The red bucket may not have been avoidable, but the extinguisher looks like it was.

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: monsoon84
Posted 2012-11-24 13:43:53 and read 631 times.

I do not   there were buildings on both sides of me. This was the only spot on the fence where I could see it without one of the building in the way. Do you think I should try uploading it?


Thanks,
Monsoon84

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-25 02:03:05 and read 604 times.

Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 9):
Do you think I should try uploading it?

You could, but just be prepared for a motive rejection. How rare is the aircraft? If it's new to the db, there might be a little allowance for the obstruction.

Topic: RE: Post Screening Help MD80
Username: monsoon84
Posted 2012-11-25 12:23:04 and read 591 times.

Ok, I'll try uploading it... There are only 3 photos of this aircraft so I'll try. Thank you for the help.



Monsoon84


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/