http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/photography_feedback/read.main/367672/
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-03 15:24:14 and read 2220 times.
Hello
I've just submitted this one:
1 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/w1349301897.8369img_1257-1.jpg
2 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/r1349303336.986img_1222-1.jpg
Would like your feedback about it and it´s chances of acceptance.
Thx
[Edited 2012-10-03 15:30:21]
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2012-10-03 15:44:17 and read 2212 times.
Quoting Patich (Thread starter):
Would like your feedback about it and it´s chances of acceptance.
1. This looks oversharp on my screen towards the rear of the aircraft while the nose looks a little soft.
2. Possibly a little heat hazed and oversharp trying to compensate for it?
Darren
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-03 17:14:49 and read 2203 times.
Agree with Darren both slightly os, but I think should be passable
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-04 12:20:46 and read 2160 times.
Thank you both for your inputs and glad that you think they are passable.
Photo 1 has no sharp added, except the export sharp.
Photo 2 had just a little bit, but way less then what I used to use.
Something definitly changed with my photos this couple of months to be nedding no sharp.
[Edited 2012-10-04 13:00:13]
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-05 03:56:39 and read 2130 times.
Hello
Please comment on these two. One is a pre-screening and the other a post-screening
Pre-screening:
Following the OS issue I had, this one is the first time i use the sharp slider to the left.
1 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../q1349386153.6948img_1176-1-24.jpg
Post- screening:
Rejected by Grainy and Category "Not dark category"
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...001_k1348264662.4461img_0926-3.jpg
Changed the NR, Masking and a little twick on the exposure. However I still have a doubt: Should the Dark category be selected, as the photo was taken after the sunset?
2 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/a1349433919.6988img_0926-1.jpg
[Edited 2012-10-05 03:59:59]
[Edited 2012-10-05 04:00:22]
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-05 06:20:47 and read 2118 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 4):
Pre-screening:
Still a touch os, but might be passable.
Quoting Patich (Reply 4):
Post- screening:
If the sun was below the horizon, then 'Dark' was the correct category to select. New version looks a bit dark/soft.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-05 06:54:52 and read 2116 times.
Thanks Dana
Pre-screening:
Trying to get it right. Reduced sharp little bit more:
1 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../q1349444972.2349img_1176-4-18.jpg
Post-screening
Went back to the 1st version and increased Masking and a bit NR.
2 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/q1349443893.7171img_0926-2.jpg
Looks better?
Maybe this v2 firmware for the 7D is getting my photos sharper. I don´t know.
Username: vikkyvik
Posted 2012-10-05 10:15:28 and read 2106 times.
UA looks a bit soft.
Angola looks soft and a bit noisy.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-05 12:45:05 and read 2095 times.
Thanks for your comments Vik
UA-
It seems I reduced too much. Just reverted to the previous version
Angola
Increased the NR and sharp. There is some distortion around the reg that I´m having some trouble to fix
Do you see the noise all around?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/o1349465458.4385img_0926-5.jpg
Bruno
Username: vikkyvik
Posted 2012-10-05 14:40:37 and read 2089 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 8):
Do you see the noise all around?
Mostly in the darker areas, like the grey on the bottom of the fuse.
It still looks soft to me - I'm thinking that you're putting in too much NR now. Also looks quite dark overall.
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-06 01:52:10 and read 2077 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 8):
Increased the NR and sharp.
I see a slight amount of noise, but as Vik said, softness would be the bigger problem.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-09 03:23:23 and read 2049 times.
Thx Dana
The Angola was at ISO 800 and I´m failing to reduce Noise and Softness at the same time. Maybe it has no solution. I don´t know
Another one.
I would like your comments on this rejection:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ame=g1348936576.0305img_9502-2.jpg
Quality
Blurry
Over-sharpened
Overexposed
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-09 06:30:41 and read 2039 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 11):
I would like your comments on this rejection:
I would have added color as well, a little too much yellow.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-13 12:53:34 and read 2007 times.
Quoting dlowwa (Reply 12):
I would have added color as well
ok... thats embarrassing. but yes I see your point. I´ll leave that to later.
Pre-screening
Please comment on this one. I like these greys skys but they are tricky.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/u1349823066.2465img_2358-1.jpg
Bruno
Username: Newark727
Posted 2012-10-13 13:22:07 and read 2006 times.
I would say that the tail and reg area is a little overexposed and possibly a little oversharpened, and I think it could stand to be a tick higher in the frame.
Username: vikkyvik
Posted 2012-10-13 16:07:54 and read 1998 times.
Quoting Newark727 (Reply 14):
possibly a little oversharpened
I actually see it the opposite - I'd probably give the whole thing a slight kick of sharpening. 
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-13 19:42:19 and read 1988 times.
Sharpening & centering look passable, it should be ok.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-14 06:28:38 and read 1965 times.
Thanks guys.
Pre-screening
Keeping in the greys skies theme and pushing it up a level.
I´ve just realize I have one photo of this "K" baby. I thought I had missed it.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/z1350220824.8365img_2362-3.jpg
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-14 11:53:26 and read 1949 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 17):
I´ve just realize I have one photo of this "K" baby.
Should be ok.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-24 11:16:24 and read 1803 times.
Hello again
Please comment on these two:
Pre-screening
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/f1351102023.3853img_1477-1.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/i1350934669.8323img_0766-2.jpg
Thx in advance
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-24 11:57:50 and read 1797 times.
Not the best light on the second, but both will probably be passable.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-10-31 13:41:45 and read 1761 times.
Hello
Please comment on these ones:
Pre-screening
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/p1351281402.1548img_1454-1.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/l1351714783.3279img_3417-8.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/g1351715988.9629img_2191-2.jpg
Thank you in advance
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-10-31 14:28:12 and read 1755 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 21):
Please comment on these ones:
Just a dust spot on the second; no major issues otherwise.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-01 13:33:00 and read 1745 times.
Hello Dana, spot removed and uploaded.
Now, my first experience indoors in a museum and also with a ultrawide that a fellow visitor lended me there.
Pre-screening
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/p1351800830.6821img_1723-1.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/a1351801384.4878img_1699-2.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/l1351801889.5079img_1676-1.jpg
Thx in advance
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-01 14:36:33 and read 1742 times.
Cockpit shot is a bit bright, but otherwise they look ok for quality. For level, try to use the verticals in the center of the frame, and keep in mind for the barrel distortion typical with uwa shots the edges should tilt in equally as much.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-01 16:17:41 and read 1741 times.
ok
Pulled back a little on the 2nd. Is it better?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/k1351810335.7894img_1699-2-3.jpg
For the level,
ajusted on the 1st by the two bars on the top.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/u1351811148.7638img_1723-2.jpg
the 3rd is leveled by the bar over the captain window. does seem leveled. is it correct?
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-01 16:48:00 and read 1736 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 25):
Pulled back a little on the 2nd. Is it better?
Yes.
Quoting Patich (Reply 25):
does seem leveled. is it correct?
I think it needs cw rotation.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-02 12:47:33 and read 1741 times.
Ok thx
So, another go at leveling
DC3
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/o1351884574.3401img_1676-2.jpg
Dornier
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/m1351885445.9961img_1723-3.jpg
Did I get it right?
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-02 23:00:13 and read 1730 times.
First should be ok, but second still feels cw.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-03 02:25:05 and read 1726 times.
Ok
Leveling this is revealing more complicated than I thought.
Now I leveled by the vertical bars between the blue column and the aircraft.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/q1351934310.333img_1723-4.jpg
And this one got rejected:
Post-Screening
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ame=f1351102023.3853img_1477-1.jpg
Over-sharpened
Overexposed
Thanks
Bruno
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2012-11-03 02:35:22 and read 1724 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 29):
Now I leveled by the vertical bars between the blue column and the aircraft.
Museum photography and wide angle lenses are inherently difficult when it comes to levelling. As a rule of thumb, always level using a vertical in the centre of the frame. This averages any barrel distortion. There are plenty of verticals in the background on the window frames so I'd have used those as reference. Having said that, it's what looks right in the end that matters. I get the feel it needs a little more CW rotation. I'd probably give is a little extra sharpening as well.
Quoting Patich (Reply 29):
Over-sharpened
Overexposed
It is a little sharp on my screen, the cheat lines are very jagged. You may need to selectively sharpen the aircraft and not sharpen the cheat lines. For me, it's not overexposed, that rejection reason is a little misleading. It's just a little too bright for this site. Reduce the exposure a little and you should be fine.
Darren
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-17 14:32:36 and read 1708 times.
Hello guys
Today I´ve tried something different. Comments please
Pre-screening
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/m1353191191.1619img_2265-2.jpg
Thanks
Bruno
Username: gonzalu
Posted 2012-11-18 18:29:29 and read 1707 times.
What happened to the wheels? How are they hidden by the background grass? Or is the runway not actually the one in front?
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-18 19:23:28 and read 1707 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 31):
Today I´ve tried something different. Comments please
Not sure what is different about it, but the missing wheels will be an issue, as it was avoidable, and it is oversharpened.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-19 01:39:21 and read 1705 times.
I should have been more specific in my previous post. You are both right. Sorry for that.
The difference in the photo was the lower speed, but with the wheels issue I´ll scrap this one.
Thanks
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-24 12:02:16 and read 1672 times.
Hello
I would like your opinion on this photo in general and, for future reference, if the aircraft is allowed to be offcenter to the left because of the follow-me
Pre-screening
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/z1353786949.2103img_2532-1.jpg
Thanks
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-25 02:00:03 and read 1653 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 35):
I would like your opinion on this photo
Centering should be ok, but there are exposure (high) and contrast (low) issues.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-25 11:48:08 and read 1647 times.
Ok Dana
Made some corrections on exposure and contrast.
Did I get it right??
Pre-scennning
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/o1353872665.6504img_2532-2.jpg
Thx again
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-25 14:09:36 and read 1640 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 37):
Made some corrections on exposure and contrast.
Did I get it right??
Better, but the light is still pretty poor.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-11-25 14:44:46 and read 1640 times.
One last try.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/g1353882933.6681img_2532-3.jpg
Maybe I´m aiming too high with this one.
Thx
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-11-26 01:42:01 and read 1624 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 39):
One last try.
As above. Better than the first, but the light is quite poor.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-12-08 13:38:22 and read 1475 times.
Hello
I would like your comments on this one.
I like it because of the condesation in the engine, but the sun was high and in front.
Does it stand a chance? (and do you see it oversharped?)
Pre-screening
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/t1355002296.8976img_2914-02.jpg
Thanks
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-12-09 02:35:57 and read 1462 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 41):
Does it stand a chance? (and do you see it oversharped?)
Sharpening seems ok, but look a little flat & noisy.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-12-13 12:57:32 and read 1416 times.
Hello,
Made another edit to the Angola to correct contrast anf NR.
Is it ok?
Pre-screening
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/x1355432046.9565img_2914-2.jpg
Thx again
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-12-13 17:07:12 and read 1400 times.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-12-23 05:55:54 and read 1312 times.
Hello
Happy hollidays to all.
I need your opinion on this one.
It´s another try on low shutter speed photo
Pre-screening
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/c1356270810.3088img_3829-1.jpg
Thx
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-12-24 01:32:46 and read 1287 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 45):
It´s another try on low shutter speed photo
Sorry, more than a few severe problems with this one.
Username: Patich
Posted 2012-12-31 10:14:37 and read 1253 times.
Hello
Wish you all a happy new year with everything you desire.
Quoting dlowwa (Reply 46):
Sorry, more than a few severe problems with this one.
Lets just forget I showed you that one, ok...?
Now I need help with this one:
Post-screening
- Level (no cw or ccw mention)
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ame=j1356293798.3381img_0732-1.jpg
I zoomed the photo and the edges of the houses seem ok.
Thx
And again a happy 2013
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2012-12-31 15:34:21 and read 1246 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 47):
Post-screening
- Level
Looks like it needs a little cw.
Quoting Patich (Reply 47):
(no cw or ccw mention)
Sorry about that. I'll try and remind the screener he should be leaving personal messages with level rejections.
Username: Patich
Posted 2013-01-03 13:27:38 and read 1231 times.
Hello again
I would like your opinion on this one.
I can´t say i´m happy with this edit but i´m failing to see where to improve.
This was yesterday and was a huge, really huge, surprise as Condor don´t fly here to Lisbon. It was a medical emergency almost at lunch time with a very high sun.
Pre-screening:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/a1357247573.2096img_4225-1.jpg
Thx
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2013-01-03 16:03:23 and read 1224 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 49):
I would like your opinion on this one.
A bit dark/noisy, but probably passable as is.
Username: Patich
Posted 2013-01-20 05:31:15 and read 1109 times.
Hello.
Would like your opinion on these:
Post-screening:
1)Tui:
Grainy
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...115_i1357476852.2805img_3586-2.jpg
Made this new edit, but I´m afraid to make it soft:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/j1358687820.9938img_3586-3.jpg
2)heli:
Dark
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0115_n1357510395.528img_4394-2.jpg
Made this new edit but I'm concerned about the nose:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/m1358688506.573img_4394-3.jpg
Thx
Bruno
Username: DL747
Posted 2013-01-20 11:42:29 and read 1102 times.
With the first, I really don't see that much of a difference, to be honest. The second looks a bit less noisy in the sky, so it is better, but really not too big of a differnece. The second looks partially backlit or nose lit, and so therefore the nose is far brighter than the tail. The nose is close to blown out, but the tail still looks dark to me. It may not be fixable.
Username: Patich
Posted 2013-02-16 09:30:57 and read 909 times.
Hello
Would like your opinion on this one:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/f1361035413.96img_5549-1.jpg
My concerns contrast and sharp
Thx
Bruno
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2013-02-16 09:39:08 and read 906 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 53):
My concerns contrast and sharp
It looks oversharp on my screen.
Darren
Username: Patich
Posted 2013-02-16 11:18:41 and read 893 times.
OK
Made another edit
Still OS?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/k1361038187.6741img_5549-2.jpg
Thx
Bruno
Username: dazbo5
Posted 2013-02-16 11:31:26 and read 890 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 55):
Still OS?
That looks better on my screen now.
Darren
Username: Patich
Posted 2013-03-12 12:59:11 and read 667 times.
Hello,
Would like your opinion on this one I took sunday.
Does it look OS to you? I'm not sure about those front letters
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/z1363117913.359img_6488-1.jpg
Thanks in advance
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2013-03-13 02:53:30 and read 636 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 57):
Does it look OS to you? I'm not sure about those front letters
No, actually a touch soft and noisy in the sky. Should be fixable.
Username: Patich
Posted 2013-03-13 12:35:07 and read 622 times.
OK Dana
New edit. Is it better?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/n1363203247.1312img_6488-02.jpg
Thanks again
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2013-03-13 14:50:18 and read 613 times.
Again, maybe a touch soft toward the front, but otherwise quality looks ok.
Username: Patich
Posted 2013-03-21 12:29:08 and read 528 times.
Dana, hello again
Got rejected
Post-screening:
Overexposed: "Body of AC is overexposed."
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ame=w1363212442.2038img_6488-3.jpg
Is this right or worth appeal?
Bruno
Username: dlowwa
Posted 2013-03-21 23:42:54 and read 501 times.
Quoting Patich (Reply 61):
Is this right or worth appeal?
It should have a good chance at appeal.
Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/