Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Prescreening - Various GA  
User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3710 times:

Hi everyone,

I'm still a beginner photographer, and trying to practice both my photo taking and editing abilities. I was hoping that I could get some feedback on some photos of GA at my local airport.

I know these are nothing special and there's no heavy metal, but I'm trying to take photos of subjects that are within my current skill range and camera ability as I learn how to improve.

Thanks in advance for your help and advice!

Cherokee:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...otography%20101/VP_Cherokee_02.jpg

C172:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...hotography%20101/VP_Skyhawk_01.jpg

Cirrus:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...Photography%20101/VP_Cirrus_01.jpg

C172:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...tography%20101/VP_Cessna172_01.jpg

TriPacer
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...otography%20101/VP_Tripacer_01.jpg


-Vincent
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3710 times:

Not too bad. They are all somewhat oversharpened, and the second and fourth are backlit. The third seems to be suffering from some heat haze as well. I would focus on the first and last, which should just need some adjustment to the sharpening.

User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3685 times:

Thank you very much for the advice. They were all sharpened using 2 or 3 light passes of USM in PS. I hopefully fixed up the Cherokee and TriPacer photos by erasing jagged edges where needed using layers. They are currently in the queue.

I'll keep the other 3 for the personal album. Thanks again!



-Vincent
User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3592 times:

Well, both the Cherokee and TriPacer were accepted, so thanks again for the help and advice!

Today I stopped by the airport and managed to get a few shots before I gave up due to my fingers being numb from the cold.

Hawker 800 (Love this paint job.)
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...tography%20101/VP_Hawker800_03.jpg

Had a little trouble editing this next one, specifically with the color cast. Due to the setting sun, there was a strong yellow cast that I tried to neutralize. Any advice on this one is greatly appreciated.
Cessna 175:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...tography%20101/VP_Cessna175_02.jpg

Diamond Katana:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...aphy%20101/VP_DiamondKatana_01.jpg



-Vincent
User currently offlinecomair25 From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 216 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3588 times:

Quoting vposbic (Reply 3):
Diamond Katana:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...1.jpg

Love that aircraft. Its a DA40XLS Diamond Star though. Katana is the little A1 bother. I have over 100 hours in the DA40-180 model with G1000. Lovely aircraft to fly and if I ever bought one, that would be it.


User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3586 times:

Quoting comair25 (Reply 4):
Love that aircraft. Its a DA40XLS Diamond Star though. Katana is the little A1 bother. I have over 100 hours in the DA40-180 model with G1000. Lovely aircraft to fly and if I ever bought one, that would be it.

Ah, my mistake, thanks for the correction! I obviously hadn't done my research on the N-number/aircraft type yet. I definitely would have caught that had I been uploading the shot and confirming the aircraft type.

I have to say though, the lack of main gear wheel pants detracts from the look a bit! (I've recently seen a Cirrus sans wheel pants too, and it also just looked off).



-Vincent
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10101 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3586 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting vposbic (Reply 3):
Hawker 800 (Love this paint job.)

Looks slightly oversharpened in places, and the contrast may be a touch strong (though it might just be the colorscheme).

Quoting vposbic (Reply 3):
Cessna 175:

Color looks fine (I actually would have probably removed less of the yellow personally). Sky looks a bit grainy.

Quoting vposbic (Reply 3):
Diamond Katana:

Tail looks maybe a little soft, but otherwise fine to me.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3564 times:

Thanks for the input. I looked at the photos from the links, and they indeed seem oversharpened compared to when I open them in PS. I guess they lose quality in the upload process to Photobucket? Would it be better if I upload them to the A.net queu, and then remove them if they are not deemed up to par? (That way they are of the actual quality that will appear on A.net)

Anyway, in addition to those three photos, can I please have some advice regarding the following:

This one passed a brief motive test by a screener in another thread, but was not critiqued for overall quality, etc.
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...Photography%20101/VP_Nimbus_01.jpg

And if the above photo of the Hawker in full is not acceptable, I am considering submitting this tail shot instead (though not both).
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y26...ography%20101/VP_HawkerTail_01.jpg

Thanks for your help and advice!



-Vincent
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 8, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3550 times:

Quoting vposbic (Reply 7):
This one passed a brief motive test by a screener in another thread, but was not critiqued for overall quality, etc.

Looks fine.

Quoting vposbic (Reply 7):
And if the above photo of the Hawker in full is not acceptable, I am considering submitting this tail shot instead

Prefer the wide-crop myself.


User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3542 times:

Thanks Dana, I'll upload them and see how it goes.


-Vincent
User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3303 times:

Well, thanks to everyone's help, all of the photos in my last batch got added to the database, so I was very pleased about that.

I have some new photos to upload, and I would please like some feedback on 2 of them. So far, I have been uploading 1024 pixel high photos, but I wanted to try to upload the following 2 photos at 1600 pixels, and I would like to know if the quality is there to upload them at this size or not.

Appreciate the feedback!

Great Lakes:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...76vp_greatlakesn3822f_large_01.jpg

Cessna 172S:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...9.8984vp_cessnan387af_large_01.jpg

[Edited 2012-01-29 15:34:52]


-Vincent
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 11, posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3295 times:

Quoting vposbic (Reply 10):
I wanted to try to upload the following 2 photos at 1600 pixels, and I would like to know if the quality is there to upload them at this size or not.

First is probably ok; the second is more borderline.


User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3215 times:

Hi guys,

I have a post-screening question this time. The following photo was rejected for Color: Yellow Tint. I completely agree, considering that I think I uploaded the wrong photo. I had edited this one, saw that the color was wrong, and started another edit. Unfortunately, I selected the wrong photo during the upload process.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20120208_x1327960482.042vp_cherokeen8265n_02.jpg


Here is the version I should have uploaded. Is this "correct" version actually correct?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/u1328798637.8286vp_cherokeen8265n_03.jpg

Thanks in advance for your help and advice.



-Vincent
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 13, posted (2 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3207 times:

A little bit over-corrected (touch too blue now) but you've got the right idea.

User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3200 times:

Thanks again for the advice Dana. I re-edited it one more time and put it back in the queue.


-Vincent
User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2967 times:

Hi everyone,

This isn't really a pre or post screening query, but I didn't want to start a new thread just to ask the following simple question:

I just has a photo accepted this morning, and the comment that I had put in the remark section is missing. I'm assuming that the screeners removed it since it may not have provided any useful information to the photo?

I'm pretty sure I've read somewhere on the site that the screeners do indeed reserve the right to edit or delete remarks/comments, but I assumed it was mainly for vulgar or self-praising remarks. I don't mind, I'm just curious because this is the first time I've heard of this actually happening.

Also, is there a simple way to edit/add remarks after a photo has been uploaded? If the remark I added the first time around wasn't useful enough, I can add something that is (I generally hate it when photos have no remark  ).

[Edited 2012-02-28 06:47:59]


-Vincent
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 16, posted (2 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

That would depend what the remark was. Vulgar and self-praising remarks of course are removed, but anything in the "hey look at the waving/smiling/picking his nose pilot", "almost a bird strike!!!", or "this airline sucks!" will usually be removed as well.

User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2585 times:

Hello everyone,

I finally got a chance to get out and shoot some more photos, but this time I have some more general questions rather than photo quality questions.

I shot some photos of a Baron 55 today, and got several angles of it: left side, right side, and a frontal nose shot. I reread the rejection guide though, and I'm pretty sure the following 2 photos fall under the "Double" rejection guide, but I wanted to make sure. Specifically, I looked at examples 4a and 4b under the "Double" section, and my uncertainty comes from the fact that example 4a is not exactly as much of a nose shot as mine.

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/Spitfire222/Aviation%20Photography%20101/VP_BaronN497A_01.jpg

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/Spitfire222/Aviation%20Photography%20101/VP_BaronN497A_02.jpg

Secondly, I just wanted to confirm my belief that the following photo would be rejected for "Dark"? The winds were gusting making for some interested landings which is why I even bothered with this shot. The problem is these photos are taken from the glider operations area, which why I'm allowed to get so close to the runway. Ideally, I should try to get on the other side of the runway for better lighting, but I'm not sure if it's permitted.

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/Spitfire222/Aviation%20Photography%20101/VP_N163ME_01.jpg

Thanks for any help/advice.



-Vincent
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10101 posts, RR: 26
Reply 18, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2578 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting vposbic (Reply 17):
and I'm pretty sure the following 2 photos fall under the "Double" rejection guide, but I wanted to make sure.

I'd say yes, more than likely a double.

Quoting vposbic (Reply 17):
Secondly, I just wanted to confirm my belief that the following photo would be rejected for "Dark"? The winds were gusting making for some interested landings which is why I even bothered with this shot.

Probably some combination of Dark, Contrast, or Overexposed due to the lighting.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2562 times:

Thanks for the advice! I went ahead and picked one of the Baron shots to upload. The rest of the backlighted photos I'll keep for my personal collection.  


-Vincent
User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2530 times:

Hi guys,

I was wondering if I could get some thoughts on the following photo.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20120413_g1333681437.7212vp_marge_01.jpg

It was rejected for "Motive", with screener comments "poor crop, obstructions." I'll admit I wasn't too optimistic of this photo's chances, but I figured i could give it a shot, considering that the display of this aircraft makes it such that this is the only angle/view to get a decent photo of it. There's just so little room to compose it properly, and even my best efforts led to some wires in frame.

The "Motive" section of the rejection guide states the following for museum photos:
"...Permanent obstructions (such as steps, fences, or signs) that could not have been avoided by composing the shot differently are acceptable....Minor obstructions such as chains or ropes should be positioned to not seriously detract from the image..."

I might get a chance to return to the museum, so I was wondering if anyone thinks I bother trying to shoot it again, appeal the photo (based on the rejection guide comments), or just accept that there's little to no possibility that a photo of this aircraft will make it into the database.

Thanks for any advice!  



-Vincent
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 21, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2528 times:

Try to find an angle where the cables/net aren't in the way. A slightly awkward crop should be acceptable if you can do that.

User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2526 times:

Thanks for the quick advice Dana. Unfortunately, I don't think there's decent angle without some cables or netting being in frame. I'll check again the next time I'm there, and see if there might be some other workable solution if I get creative. Thanks again!


-Vincent
User currently offlinevposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2505 times:

Hi guys,

I just submitted a photo of Discovery atop her 747 carrier at IAD and got rejected for grain. I re-edited and applied a bit more noise reduction during RAW processing, and I was wondering if it was enough. Or, should I try this photo at 1000 pixels instead of 1200? Thanks for any help.  http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/v1334695571.5865vp_n905na_03.jpg



-Vincent
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 24, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2504 times:

I just added it, so you're good to go  

25 Post contains images vposbic : Dana, thank you so much! This was my first experience with priority screening, and the expediency is very impressive. I'm very happy to have this phot
26 Post contains links and images vposbic : Hi guys, I'm back with a post-screening question regarding the same P-38 that I had a photo rejected of for Motive (reply 20). This time, I tried to g
27 dlowwa : If possible, I would try to frame it so that the props aren't cut.
28 Post contains links and images vposbic : Thanks Dana. I'm not sure it's possible with the limited space, and with my equipment. I don't have a fish-eye lens, and even if I did, a wider FOV wo
29 dlowwa : Some obstruction is allowed, especially for permanent displays where it is unavoidable. Soft, unlevel, harsh light, and some vignetting. Harsh light/
30 Post contains images vposbic : Thanks for the input Dana. I've removed the Phenom and Cirrus photos from the queue, and will probably keep them to myself; I don't think they can be
31 Post contains links and images vposbic : Got some post-screening questions this time. Received this "Level" rejection, with personal note from the screener : "needs CCW rotation". I leveled t
32 Post contains links and images vposbic : Hi everyone, I have a motive question. Does the aircraft passing in the background serve as an interesting enough feature to justify this crop? Or sho
33 dlowwa : Borderline. I'd probably be ok with it, but can't say the same for everyone.
34 vposbic : Thank you Dana, I'll give it a shot, and if it doesn't make it, I'll try a different crop (barring any other issues with the photo).
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Prescreening - Various GA
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format