dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31 Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 4329 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Hi Andy,
First one is too dark - pilots' shirts are properly exposed, but the rest of the cockpit is under-exposed. Unfortunately the positioning and crop of the pilots makes this a borderline motive as well. Second could be a bit brighter, but is probably ok as is; the soft right side (dof) also shouldn't be bad enough to cause problems.
aadc10137 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, RR: 1 Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 4321 times:
Hi Dana!
Thanks for the feeback..I thought the A330 might not make it for movite..I'll yank that one from the Q. Not a whole lot of cabin views of DL DC-9's so I was lucky to have caught that one! Thanks again!
aadc10137 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, RR: 1 Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4232 times:
Good morning everyone,
I have a couple of old scans that I thought I'd try to put in the db but would like opinions to see if they'd pass or if they need a little bit more tweaking. Thanks!
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31 Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4213 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
The NW is flat and soft, and there's either the remnants of grain that you've tired to remove or jpeg artifacts visible. The JL is better, just needs a little more sharpening. If they're more than ten years old, they will get a little more leniency.
aadc10137 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, RR: 1 Reply 9, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4064 times:
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31 Reply 10, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4051 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Hi Andy,
The NZ has quality issues - noise, contrast, os, and worst of all it seems heat haze is at play, which generally isn't fixable. The DHL is very low contrast and slightly oversharpened, which may be fixable with a better edit.
aadc10137 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, RR: 1 Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3742 times:
Hey guys,
A few that are in the Q for critique...Thanks in advance!
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31 Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3739 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Hi Andy,
First is a bit noisy/flat, but should be fixable. Second is overexposed and soft/blurry toward the tail. The ERJ in the foreground will be an issue as well, as technically you should list the info for the nearst fully-visible aircraft, and it's obviously quite blurry.
aadc10137 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, RR: 1 Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3737 times:
Hi Dana,
Thanks for the feedback. I'm probably going to keep the DL for the personal collection as i've tried a few edits and I'm just not totally happy with them.. I'll take a look at another edit for the 707. Thanks again!!
aadc10137 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, RR: 1 Reply 14, posted (1 year 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3582 times:
aadc10137 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, RR: 1 Reply 16, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3503 times:
Hi Dana,
Thanks for the feedback on the 747.. I didn't get back on here in time to see your reply in order to re-edit it so it was rightfully rejected for being too low in frame. I've re-edited it and stuck it back in the Q. From what I can see the centering is better than the rejected photo.
aadc10137 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, RR: 1 Reply 18, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3497 times:
Thanks Dana.. I edited my original post to show the rejected photo. when I center it I'm going by the top of the fuselage to the bottom of the aircraft wheel. Will have another try at it when I get out of work.
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31 Reply 19, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3496 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Definitely better; I think the tug is adding a bit of 'weight' to the lower part of the frame. If you are going to put it any higher, it only needs to be a touch. Otherwise, just go with the new edit and see what happens.
25 aadc10137: Finally caught the Hong Kong Trader! Using a new computer so I'd like to make sure this one is good to go Andy http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...
27 aadc10137: Good afternoon everyone! Went on my honeymoon to SXM this past weekend and took a few on the famous Maho beach.. Here are a few to have a look at.. th
28 dlowwa: Both of those are heavily compressed, so you will need to remove them from the queue and re-submit versions saved at higher quality. They're both also
29 aadc10137: Thanks Dana. Not sure why the compression was off but I fixed them up so hopefully they should be good to go now.. I also have a DC-10 cockpit shot th
30 dlowwa: Don't see compression being an issue on the newer versions. The cockpit shot is yellow and a little soft.
31 aadc10137: Thanks Dana! I re-worked the DC10 and added a few others to the Q. Could you have a look and let me know if they need any adjusting? Thanks! Andy http
32 aadc10137: Tried a few panning shots and wanted to get some opinions on how they are and the chances of being added. Thx in advance! Andy http://www.airliners.ne
33 dlowwa: Bit of noise on the WN ones, but other than that should be ok.
34 aadc10137: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...92679.5125zk-okp_laxdec0920122.jpg Andy
35 aadc10137: Good evening, guys! I have a couple here for a quick look. I got a new computer and want to make sure all of my settings from my old one were used wit
36 dlowwa: A bit dark, and the white balance looks a little cool (too blue). Should be easy to fix if working from RAW files.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 194 posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}