Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre Screening  
User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 7 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7555 times:

hello, your help
What do you think of this picture??
thanks

http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/8986/30698052.jpg

310 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (2 years 7 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 7541 times:

Quoting boing (Thread starter):
What do you think of this picture?

Soft and taken in very poor light.

You do not need to start a new thread for every image/question. If you have any new images or questions related to them, keep them in this thread.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 7523 times:

Sorry, but soft to fix the problem what to do?? photo taken in backlight.
If I can give advice to solve the soft, I do not understand how to do (my photos are always soft)
thanks


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10049 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (2 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 7520 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting boing (Reply 2):
Sorry, but soft to fix the problem what to do??

You would have to sharpen it in Photoshop or a similar editing program.

However, given this:

Quoting boing (Reply 2):
photo taken in backlight.

There's not much point in editing it for A.net.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (2 years 7 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 7516 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 2):
photo taken in backlight.

It is very difficult to get backlit photos accepted here without the proper motivation. The best thing for you to do is wait for better conditions (i.e. clear skies and sun at your back), and then try again. We can worry about sharpening at that time. I don't think any editing will help you save the photo above.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 7 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 7487 times:

What do you think,
I've improved it soft?
thanks



http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/3232/bisdsc2945.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (2 years 7 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 7478 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 5):
What do you think,
I've improved it soft?

It's a little oversharpened and noisy, but should be fixable.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 7 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 7474 times:

now it improved??
thanks

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9898/airlinersdsc2945.jpg


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 7 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 7469 times:

sorry, I did not notice and I mistakenly deleted the previous
image


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 9, posted (2 years 7 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 7464 times:

Sharpening is better, but it appears there is some heat haze. You can try to hide it by submitting at 1024, but that may or may not work.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 7 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7433 times:

thanks
to put more photos
continued here


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 7 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 7407 times:

What do you think of this
thanks

http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/5674/srilankanairlinersdsc41.jpg


User currently offlineCargoLex From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1274 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (2 years 7 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 7404 times:

It's below the minimum size requirement, so it's hard to evaluate. It would be rejected for size if uploaded at those dimensions.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 7 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 7403 times:

sorry I was wrong

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/5674/srilankanairlinersdsc41.jpg


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10049 posts, RR: 26
Reply 14, posted (2 years 7 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 7398 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Looks a bit oversharpened to me.


"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 15, posted (2 years 7 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 7389 times:

Also has some editing halos around the aircraft that you should take care of.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 7 months 13 hours ago) and read 7329 times:

an opinion on this photo
thanks

http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/9781/saudid.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 17, posted (2 years 7 months 9 hours ago) and read 7317 times:

Noisy, and VERY oversharpened.

User currently onlineteopilot From Italy, joined Jul 2010, 546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (2 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 7303 times:

I agree with what Dana said... (and how can he be wrong?! LOL)

You've applied too much USM, thus probably ending up into grain (because I don't know if the picture was already grainy by itself, but the USM usually make things worse...).
Also, I see some grain in the sky, probably due to the fact that you didn't use the USM selectively (there's a quick how-to-do guide for this on A.net photo editing guide)

A general rule: exceeding never pays off... and, also in this case, by exceeding with the USM you have got a picture that seems quite "unreal" to me, because of its excessive sharpening.
I'll give you a word of advice, basing on my experience: generally I apply USM three times...
1. 200%, 0.2, 0
2. 200%, 0.2, 0
3. 100%, 0.2, 0
This technique works almost perfectly for my combos, both 70-200L and 15-85 on my 450D.
But there are not general rules when it comes to sharpening... you can be given advice, but you have to try and try until you find the perfect settings.

But what I think you're missing too is a quick pass with NR tool: USM generally makes some grain come out... with a "soft" NR pass, you can benefit a lot (at least, this works with me!).

I can see lots of jaggies on your last picture too.
It's better to apply USM on a duplicated layer and then to use the eraser tool to erase them. (Jaggies are those "white lines" that came to be noticeable with strong USM passes).

Hope it helps!


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7283 times:

hours as it goes,
I selected the aircraft and unsharp mask 90, 0.5, 0

anyway you advise me to select only one aircraft to apply sharpening.

Thanks for your valuable advice

http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/7756/webdsc1596.jpg


User currently onlineteopilot From Italy, joined Jul 2010, 546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (2 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7275 times:

Well, to be honest, I see it better if compared to the previous one.

But it is still soft to my eye... I'd go with several further USM passes. Don't be harsh in applying it... and use the same method: duplicate layer, select the aircraft, USM, eraser tool, Noise reducion and flatten image.
That's all!  


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7272 times:

sorry but I have not quite clear how to use the eraser
Can you explain it to me since you're so kind
thanks
applied two mask steps as you said 200,0.2,0
thanks

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3707/2webdsc1596.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 22, posted (2 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7258 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 21):
applied two mask steps as you said 200,0.2,0

Still quite oversharpened.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 6 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 7235 times:

back again
so could go, almost nothing usm
thanks,
unfortunately I can not see the marks that you say or you say the lines ....


http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/3161/saudy3dsc1596.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 24, posted (2 years 6 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 7222 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 23):
back again

Best one so far, though just a little too soft now. It looks like heat haze might be present, and if that is the case, you will not be able to fix the image.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 7224 times:

although I really like,
changing image.
How about this
thanks


http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/4466/layonairweb.jpg

[Edited 2012-03-08 09:23:25]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 26, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 7213 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 25):
How about this

Not too bad, though there seems to be a fair amount of compression. Because of that hard to say for sure if it's too noisy/os.


User currently onlineteopilot From Italy, joined Jul 2010, 546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 27, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 7221 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 24):
It looks like heat haze might be present, and if that is the case, you will not be able to fix the image.

I agree that heat haze is always a pain in the neck as it is not fixable in any way... but I can still remember a word of advice someone (probably Dana himself) here gave me some time ago: to try with a resize.
I think that in this case it worth a try, since the image should be around 1200px wide... So, if I were you, I'd have a go with a 1024px resize and see what it looks like.
Maybe I remmber wrong... but I used it at times and it seems to work properly when heat haze is not so incisive!  


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 7215 times:

We tried again in 1024 what do you say thanks
I love this photo!!

http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/293/saudy3eiezl1024.jpg


and also put this occasion.
Thanks to all

http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/4029/cargowebdsc2952.jpg


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10049 posts, RR: 26
Reply 29, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 7204 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting boing (Reply 28):
We tried again in 1024 what do you say thanks
I love this photo!!

It is a nice photo, but just might not be what A.net is looking for. Acceptance or rejection here isn't necessarily a judgment on your photographic skills, or even on the particular photo. It's worth keeping that in mind.

Even at 1024, your photo looks quite soft in parts, yet almost oversharpened in others. I think heat haze is probably the killer for this one.

Quoting boing (Reply 28):
and also put this occasion.

It's soft and a bit high in the frame for my taste (Dana may disagree), but the major obstacle (no pun intended) is the blockage of the gear and engine by the taxiway signs. That will likely result in a motive rejection.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 30, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7188 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 28):
We tried again in 1024 what do you say thanks
Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 29):
Even at 1024, your photo looks quite soft in parts, yet almost oversharpened in others.

Yes, probably best to give up on this one.

Quoting boing (Reply 28):
and also put this occasion.
Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 29):
It's soft and a bit high in the frame for my taste (Dana may disagree)

No, you are correct on both counts Vik.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 7171 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 29):
It's soft and a bit high in the frame for my taste (Dana may disagree), but the major obstacle (no pun intended) is the blockage of the gear and engine by the taxiway signs. That will likely result in a motive rejection.

I understand it, the obstacles that are seen close to the wheels
and the motor are cause for rejection.
thanks

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 29):
It is a nice photo, but just might not be what A.net is looking for. Acceptance or rejection here isn't necessarily a judgment on your photographic skills, or even on the particular photo. It's worth keeping that in mind.

ok
I know abandonment,
try again with more photos
thanks


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7132 times:

How about this
thanks

http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/8898/iranairepibl.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 33, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 7115 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 32):
How about this

A little flat and noisy, but otherwise ok.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 34, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 7090 times:

I was rejected because soft
What do you think?


http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4426/airlinersdsc1024.jpg


User currently offlineCargolex From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1274 posts, RR: 8
Reply 35, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 7088 times:

It looks like a fair rejection to me - it does look soft overall to me. Selective sharpening might help. If you're working in photoshop, try selecting individual areas of the aircraft and copying them into a new layer, then applying unsharp mask (I realize you may already have done this).

I get a significant number of soft rejections and I have to tell you, sharpening is probably the most difficult and frustrating aspect of working on my images - so take my opinion with a grain of salt.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 36, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 7083 times:

Quoting Cargolex (Reply 35):
If you're working in photoshop, try selecting individual areas of the aircraft and copying them into a new layer, then applying unsharp mask (I realize you may already have done this).

I selected only the plane and I applied unsharp mask.
I can better explain what it means to select individual parts of the plane (what you mean by parts?)
thanks


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 37, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 7062 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 34):
I was rejected because soft
What do you think?

I think what I said in reply 9 is still true. There is some heat haze, and you weren't able to hide it even at the smaller size. You probably cannot fix this image for here.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7052 times:

ok, I just wanted to understand what needs to be done to solve the problem "soft"
thanks

while I post this.
Give me good news .....

http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/8584/austrialianoelnndsc4836.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 39, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7047 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 38):
while I post this.

A little oversharpened. Might be acceptable with a better edit.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7044 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 39):
A little oversharpened. Might be acceptable with a better edit.

recommendations?
less sharpening!
thanks


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 41, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7034 times:

Hard to tell without seeing the original. I can take a look if you would like and tell you if the quality is there to make it worth another attempt.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 42, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 7008 times:

original image, reduced to 1200
thanks waiting for news

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/9828/dsc4836t.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 43, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 7003 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 42):
original image, reduced to 1200

Reduced to 1200 defeats the purpose. Contact me privately, and then I can give you an address where you can send the original full-size file.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 6999 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 43):
Reduced to 1200 defeats the purpose. Contact me privately, and then I can give you an address where you can send the original full-size file.

I sent the mail
thanks


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 45, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 6946 times:

Hello, I'm back,
so can fit?
thanks

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/9828/dsc4836t.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 46, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 6937 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 45):
Hello, I'm back,
so can fit?

Hi, it's soft, dark, and poorly centered.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 47, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 6921 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 26):
Not too bad, though there seems to be a fair amount of compression. Because of that hard to say for sure if it's too noisy/os.

but it is possible that I was rejected for the following reason
Reject reason: soft oversharpened
or are the subjects that are not interesting??

if not, asks advice sucome solve this problem
thanks

http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/4466/layonairweb.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 48, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6902 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 47):
but it is possible that I was rejected for the following reason
Reject reason: soft oversharpened

Yes, it does have that look... Personally, I try to never give soft and oversharpened as reasons for a single image as I can see how confusing/contradictory that can seem, but there are certainly are cases when it could happen. If your image is quite soft to start and you apply too much sharpening to compensate, that would be the result. I can't say if that's exactly what happened with your image, but like I said, it does have that look.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 49, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 6897 times:

ok, but at least when the place can tell me please the image
be accepted, so I avoid long waits and then .....
thanks always very kind


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 50, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 6896 times:

do not give up, I go back to the office
How about
thanks

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/2148/thai171211dsc4108.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 51, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6891 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 50):
How about

Not too bad. Maybe a touch soft, but only needs minor fixing.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 52, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6898 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 51):
Not too bad. Maybe a touch soft, but only needs minor fixing.

I only adjusted levels and unsharp mask 80, 02, 0
This is the original, what do I trim and clean only.
thanks

http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/4049/thaioriginale.jpg


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 53, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 6848 times:

Dlowwa, What do you think
thanks


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 54, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 6828 times:

Let's see if I improved
What do you think??


http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/4857/dsc3174t.jpg

http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/4006/neos13212dsc3553.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 55, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 6824 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 54):
What do you think??

First is oversharpened and poor (low) contrast. Second is almost ok, but looks like there are some dust spots above the forward fuselage.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 56, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 6825 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 55):
but looks like there are some dust spots above the forward fuselage.

are those dots on the right of the written noesait.it

I also put this
thanks
http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/8305/dsc4865w.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 57, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 6820 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 56):
are those dots on the right of the written noesait.it

See areas circled in red.

http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/4006/neos13212dsc3553.jpg

Quoting boing (Reply 56):
I also put this

Some heat haze, but otherwise not bad.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 58, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6742 times:

tell me your opinion
thanks


http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/8026/bisgulfair.jpg

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/9683/weboktur.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 59, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6735 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 58):
tell me your opinion

First is soft & heat hazed; the second is oversharpened and suffering from jpeg compression.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 60, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 6728 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 59):
suffering from jpeg compressi

What should be done
thanks


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 61, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 6708 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 60):
What should be done

Use less compression when you save your jpegs. Typically this is done by saving at the highest quality setting.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 62, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 6695 times:

so it's better
thanks


http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/8757/parerebisdsc2861.jpg


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 63, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 6684 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 59):
First is soft & heat hazed;

can go so

http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/3448/provaduedsc3754.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 64, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 6679 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 62):
so it's better

Seems to be, yes.

Quoting boing (Reply 63):
can go so

Can't really fix heat haze, so still no.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 65, posted (2 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6657 times:

sorry, but what does it mean?
Contrasts are now better, but the aircraft is still high in frame. Regards centered personal

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7814/20120329l13322819816877.jpg

the plane so I have to hit:
thanks

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/2783/provabasso.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 66, posted (2 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6652 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 65):
the aircraft is still high in frame

It means you need to place it lower.

Quoting boing (Reply 65):
the plane so I have to hit:

Much softer than the previous version.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 67, posted (2 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6645 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 66):
Much softer than the previous version.

no, just tell me if you look at the quality so it is centered
thanks


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 68, posted (2 years 6 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 6637 times:

I'll explain
the first is rejected as
the second plane collagato more below.
do not look at quality photos but only if the aircraft is positioned exactly
thanks


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 69, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6589 times:

I'll explain
the first is rejected as
the second plane collagato more below.
do not look at quality photos but only if the aircraft is positioned exactly
thanks

you can answer this question
thanks



http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/3162/flybegjedp3012012dsc472.jpg

http://img846.imageshack.us/img846/5686/oman2532012dsc5493.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 70, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 6573 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 69):

Both are somewhat soft, possibly due to heat haze. The first also as the nose gear obstructed (avoidable) and the second a border along the bottom of the image.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 71, posted (2 years 6 months 14 hours ago) and read 6544 times:

I wanted to try this shot
thanks

http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/4151/webpareredsc4342.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 72, posted (2 years 6 months 14 hours ago) and read 6539 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 70):
I wanted to try this shot

Also suffering from some heat haze.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 73, posted (2 years 6 months 13 hours ago) and read 6541 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 72):

I try .....

and this
Thanks to the availability

http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/5033/webpareredsc5003.jpg


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 74, posted (2 years 6 months 13 hours ago) and read 6539 times:

[quote=dlowwa,reply=57]Some heat haze, but otherwise not bad.

dlowwa excuse I say not bad but then I was rejected for this reason
sky abnormally bright in the corners oversharpened editing personal


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r.../20120404_i1332874256.2193neos.jpg

[Edited 2012-04-04 14:14:18]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 75, posted (2 years 6 months 11 hours ago) and read 6527 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 73):
and this

Will be rejeced for oversharpened/quality.

Quoting boing (Reply 74):
dlowwa excuse I say not bad but then I was rejected for this reason
sky abnormally bright in the corners oversharpened editing personal

I think the sharpening is ok, but the corners do look a little bright...did you try to remove some vignetting?


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 76, posted (2 years 6 months 2 hours ago) and read 6515 times:

give me the certainty that goes beyond the passage!
I redid the image, I want to point out that there were alterations of the image, I think the white at the edges is due to the fact that in opening the raw files I have given the type of lens, and this causes the clear corners, I cut , slight unsharp mask 90, 0.2. (if you want I can also do the original image where you found no alterations or cloning) I like you mentioned in the link of rejection under edit.
I forgot I have always rejected the images and post them to wait 10 days or so or you have to send in another address??
because of the availability


http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/7028/rifattawebdsc3553.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 77, posted (2 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 6495 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 76):
I redid the image

Corners look more normal, so it must have been your previous edit that had caused that issue.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 78, posted (2 years 5 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 6483 times:

opinion on some photos
thanks

http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/308/bis392011dsc1021.jpg

http://img860.imageshack.us/img860/6807/pareredsc5006.jpg

http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/7292/parere1dsc3193.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 79, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 6458 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 78):
opinion on some photos

Unfortunately these are all likely to be rejected. Soft, dark/contrast for the first; oversharpened, noisy, quality for the second; noisy, soft, contrast for the thrid.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 80, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6449 times:

proceed in order.
oversharpened, noisy, quality for the second;
http://img860.imageshack.us/img860/6807/pareredsc5006.jpg

and now as;
http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/8444/prova1dsc5006.jpg

noisy, soft, contrast for the thrid.

http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/7292/parere1dsc3193.jpg

and now as;
http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/6833/prova1dsc3193.jpg

[Edited 2012-04-08 12:55:05]

[Edited 2012-04-08 12:56:13]

Soft, dark/contrast for the first;
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/308/bis392011dsc1021.jpg

and now as;
http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/2355/prova1dsc1021.jpg


[Edited 2012-04-08 13:50:21]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 81, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6435 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 80):
oversharpened, noisy, quality for the second;

Now soft, low contrast, quality.

Quoting boing (Reply 80):
noisy, soft, contrast for the thrid.

Contrast, quality, soft.

Quoting boing (Reply 80):
Soft, dark/contrast for the first;

Still dark/backlit, contrast

Sorry, I don't think any of these have the quality necessary to be accepted.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 82, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 6393 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 64):
Quoting boing (Reply 62):
so it's better

Seems to be, yes.

I was refused, oversharpened
dlowwa What do you think thanks

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...412_c1333574433.6226okdsc_2861.jpg

[Edited 2012-04-12 14:41:54]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 83, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 6379 times:

Yes, looks oversharpened, especially on the titles (regular & special).

User currently offlineTomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 84, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6379 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 76):


http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/702...3.jpg

Do not mean to be harsh or anything, but the white around the characters of the airlines name is caused due to the sharpening  .



Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 85, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 6364 times:

Quoting Tomskii (Reply 84):

What should you


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 86, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6331 times:

I wanted to try this

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/2332/webmusodsc6226.jpg

thanks


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 87, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 6329 times:

Motive should be ok, but there are several quality issues. The contras is quite low, and it looks quite soft & over-processed, maybe from too much noise reduction.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 88, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6311 times:

it is better that way!!!!

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/1743/web2dsc6226gc.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 89, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6307 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 88):
it is better that way!!!!

Very soft/blurry, this has no chance of being accepted I'm afraid.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 90, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 6306 times:

try last time with this

thanks

http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/8070/web3dsc6226.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 91, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 6300 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 90):
try last time with this

Still quite soft.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 92, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6290 times:

so!
I added a bit of unsharp mask, then the rubber jaggies and a bit of noise reduction.
hope for the best
thanks

http://img576.imageshack.us/img576/1487/web4provaokdsc6226.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 93, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6284 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 92):
I added a bit of unsharp mask, then the rubber jaggies and a bit of noise reduction.

Sorry, I think the quality's just not there, or at least it has been over-edited to the point you've destroyed a lot of the quality.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 94, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 6283 times:

sorry I do not understand
the first was soft now with two passages I have destroyed.
but when it is soft what to do!! add some contrast?

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/3217/web5ultima3dsc6226.jpg


how about this?

http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/2300/web1okdsc6260.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 95, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 6277 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 94):
the first was soft now with two passages I have destroyed.

It was either too soft to start, or you've made it that way through editing, primarily through noise reduction. Without seeing the original, I can't say for sure.

Quoting boing (Reply 94):
how about this?

Looks soft, almost blurry, and then sharpened to try and compensate.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 96, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 6275 times:

summary, then tell me if the steps are ok:

amount of photos
regulate levels image
cropping
dust Removal
color and levels
only
sharpening
rubber serrations
If needed now apply noise reduction
thanks


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 97, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 6271 times:

Looks basically correct, though I'm not sure what 'amount of photos' means. Remember, there is no one 'correct' way to do things. We each need to find the best way that works for us. My editing flow may differ from yours, but as long as the results are there, it doesn't really matter. If you're not getting results you are happy with, maybe try changing things up, and see what happens.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 98, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6260 times:

Sorry, can see steps to make my eye
clipping
cleaning
levels

http://img851.imageshack.us/img851/2808/pass1basedsc6260.jpg

as is? I have to apply a contrast curve ?

[Edited 2012-04-17 11:58:19]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 99, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 6247 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 98):
as is? I have to apply a contrast curve

You could maybe add a little contrast, but looks pretty good as is.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 100, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 6244 times:

I put !!!!!
thanks for patience


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 101, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6205 times:

hello
I would try this shot

http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/296/webdsc6323.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 102, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6206 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 101):
I would try this shot

Should be ok.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 103, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 6183 times:

I want to try this shot
What do you think
thantks

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/70/webdsc6682.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 104, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 6170 times:

Not the best light, but the quality seems ok.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 105, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6137 times:

This foto was refused
1 time x grainy oversharpened
2 time x soft
now what do you think !!!
thanks
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/26/webdsc4480.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 106, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 6124 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 105):
now what do you think !!!

A bit yellow, but passable for me.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 107, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5985 times:

I wanted to put this
What do you think
thanks

http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/8307/websingstardsc6843.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 108, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5972 times:

Looks just a touch yellow, but also like there might have been some heat haze.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 109, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 5956 times:

I think it is heat, cancel singapore ok

Provo this page foto
thanks

http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/8531/prova1basedsc0463.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 110, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 5947 times:

A bit yellow, but otherwise ok.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 111, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5935 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 110):

so you think you can go
thanks

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...6831886.618provaokbasedsc_0463.jpg

[Edited 2012-05-12 07:17:54]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 112, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5932 times:

Color looks better than the previous one.

User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 113, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 5907 times:

I want to try
with this photo
What do you think
thanks

http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/5946/webdsc5366.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 114, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5896 times:

A bit flat and mostly backlit. Not a great angle for the light. The sky also seems to have some banding.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 115, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 5885 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 114):
A bit flat and mostly backlit. Not a great angle for the light. The sky also seems to have some banding.

ok you're right,
thanks observation I learned another thing that I did not know
abandonment, I want to try with this photo
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/533/basesingdsc64002.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 116, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5870 times:

Also a little back/toplit but that's not an immediate killer. It would also need a little ccw rotation. The main problem is that there is pretty heavy compression throughout the frame.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 117, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5854 times:

I changed the method of cropping
photos with the lowest possible JPEG compression (highest quality, 12 in Photoshop).

http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/5/webbisdsc6400.jpg

[Edited 2012-05-16 13:33:39]

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 118, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5822 times:

What do you think of this
thanks

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/5434/webcaraibesc6416.jpg


User currently offlineTomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 119, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5817 times:

First thing that comes up to my mind: Level


Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 120, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5808 times:

now better Level ( then crop )
thanks
http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/2626/aircaraibesbisokdsc6416.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 121, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5803 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 120):
now better Level ( then crop )

This one will be rejected for being soft.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 122, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5802 times:

so
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/2626/aircaraibesbisokdsc6416.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 123, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5799 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 122):

Better, but I don't think the quality is there for 1280. Might work at 1024.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 124, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 5793 times:

What do you think of this
thanks

http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/2130/webhainandsc6556.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 125, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5790 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 124):
What do you think of this

Slightly oversharpened and needs a tighter crop.


User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 126, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5772 times:

This foto
Heat can be seen !!!
thanks

http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/680/webarmaviabaseadsc6806.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 127, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5776 times:

Yes, definitely soft from heat haze.

User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 128, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5761 times:

What do you think of this
thanks

http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/4912/webdsc1001.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 129, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5749 times:

Quoting Boing (Reply 128):
What do you think of this

A bit blurry & grainy; the whites are not white, probably from editing; there's a border on the top edge.


User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 130, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5738 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 129):

now

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/3352/webbisokdsc1001.jpg


This occasion I put this
thanks

http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/4454/webdolomitidsc3763.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 131, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 5736 times:

Quoting Boing (Reply 130):
now

Still blurry/quality/grainy/color. Border is still there as well.

Quoting Boing (Reply 130):
This occasion I put this

Not too bad, though there is a fair amount of compression visible.


User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 132, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 5730 times:

I do not understand Compression
why occurs
I do as a guide
advice
thanks


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 133, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 5729 times:

Quoting Boing (Reply 132):
I do not understand Compression
why occurs

see: Rejection Guide - Compression


User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 134, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 5727 times:

I followed guide
because verificy


User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 135, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 5713 times:

I followed the guide
even before i used same way
What do you think
thanks

http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/8041/dolomitiokdsc3763.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 136, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 5712 times:

Seems to be less compression, but this one is also a bit flatter.

User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 137, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 5704 times:

I hope is ok
thanks

http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/8041/dolomitiokdsc3763.jpg


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 138, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5685 times:

you can check also this picture
thanks

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/1486/americandsc6521.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 139, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5682 times:

Quoting Boing (Reply 137):
I hope is ok

Softer and more compression than before. Are you simply re-editing the same file each time, or are you starting from the original?

Quoting boing (Reply 138):
you can check also this picture

Should be ok.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 140, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 5673 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 139):
Softer and more compression than before. Are you simply re-editing the same file each time, or are you starting from the original?

starting from the original
I try this foto photo
otherwise cancellation
thanks
http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/8041/dolomitiokdsc3763.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 141, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 5658 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 140):
I try this foto photo

I don't see much compression in this one. It's slightly high, but other than that could be ok.


User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 142, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 5656 times:

How about this
thanks

http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/2508/thaiokdsc6527.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 143, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 5652 times:

Quoting Boing (Reply 142):
How about this

Not too bad. Slight oversharpening, but could be ok.


User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 144, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 5640 times:

What do you think
this cut
thanks

http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/4544/kmldsc6214.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 145, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 5634 times:

Poor crop, especially bottom left.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 146, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5603 times:

something like this
looks sympathetic (playground zurich airport )

thanks

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/3205/hbiyu.jpg


User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 147, posted (2 years 4 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5580 times:

Reject reason: cyan cast colour personal

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...1337518143.7718websingdsc_6404.jpg

now okay

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...8403466.2233webregsingdsc_6404.jpg

[Edited 2012-05-30 11:49:33]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 148, posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 5550 times:

Second one looks a bit better, but don't see too much of a difference in color.

User currently offlineBoing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 149, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5440 times:

hello
after a period of absence I'm back
with this photo
What do you think
thanks

http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/2508/thaiokdsc6527.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 150, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5403 times:

Quoting Boing (Reply 143):
with this photo
What do you think

Should be ok.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 151, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5396 times:

these two photo
thanks

http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/1376/livingdsc4821.jpg

http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/6904/koreadsc4694.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 152, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 5378 times:

Both a little soft, but generally ok.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 153, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5312 times:

hello
I wanted to try this shot
thanks
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/5174/britidsc7754.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 154, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5301 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 147):
I wanted to try this shot

Not too bad, should have a decent chance.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 155, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 5003 times:

hello
What do you think of this
thanks

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/4716/dsc4740x.jpg


User currently offlineTomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 156, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4994 times:

WOW Imma require the Full HD resolution picture of that one hahaha :p Now that would be a nice desktop background ^^.


Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 157, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4982 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 149):
What do you think of this

A little over-processed, but might have a chance.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 158, posted (2 years 2 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4722 times:

hello
What do you think of this
thanks

http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/2326/provawizzdsc0448.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 159, posted (2 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4711 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 152):
What do you think of this

Dark, oversharpened to compensate for blur/softness, halo around aircraft, and compressed/blotchy sky.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 160, posted (2 years 2 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4694 times:

I changed photos
better !!

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/4532/wizzprovaokdsc8477.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 161, posted (2 years 2 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4673 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 154):
I changed photos
better !!

If you say so, but impossible to compare given you have removed the first version. The second one is soft, has a red tint, and a soft editing halo. Likely to be rejected.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 162, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4656 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 155):
If you say so,

statement was not, was only a request

you have removed the first version
because I put a different picture same airplane

now

http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/6707/wizzprovaokdsc8477copia.jpg

or this

http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/9480/weboquestadsc0449.jpg

[Edited 2012-07-30 08:44:59 by Boing]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 163, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 4644 times:

Don't see much difference between the two, but if I had to choose, it would be the first.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 164, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 4648 times:

this photograph has a chance ?
thanks

http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/1463/dsc0307za.jpg


User currently offlinewhales From Zimbabwe, joined Oct 2006, 349 posts, RR: 0
Reply 165, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days ago) and read 4604 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

I think that this would receive a dark rejection, as it is backlit.

William


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 166, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4576 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 158):
this photograph has a chance ?

Soft and a bit dark, so probably not.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 167, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4386 times:

Reject reason:
Soft

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7350/musodsc6336.jpg

now

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/952/musobisokdsc6336.jpg

What do you think of this photo
thank you for your willingness

http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/1471/noudsc8540.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 168, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 4366 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 161):
now

Not much better.

Quoting boing (Reply 161):
What do you think of this photo

Bit soft toward the nose. Might be better smaller.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 169, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4348 times:

What do you think
better ?????
thanks

http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/7432/musotrissokdsc6336.jpg

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/9676/noubisokdsc8540.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 170, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4329 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 163):
What do you think

First is bordering on os now; second maybe passable.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 171, posted (2 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4035 times:

Hello
What do you think of this photo
thanks

http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8480/skydsc0751.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 172, posted (2 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4025 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 165):
What do you think of this photo

Very soft and over-edited. Will certainly be rejected.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 173, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4005 times:

reworked the original picture
what do you think
thanks


http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/1038/skybisdsc0751.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 174, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3994 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 167):
what do you think

Better. A bit oversharpened in places now.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 175, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3989 times:

I try again, starting from the original
one step di USM
What do you think
thanks


http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/3661/sky3dsc0751.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 176, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3981 times:

Best so far, but still marginal.

User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 177, posted (2 years 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3962 times:

now
thanks

http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/6033/sky4dsc0751.jpg


also add this photo

http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/6279/jetdsc0737.jpg

[Edited 2012-09-05 10:25:33]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 178, posted (2 years 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3949 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 171):
now
Quoting boing (Reply 171):
also add this photo

Same as above, marginal at best. Would help your chances if you went with 1024 instead of anything larger.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 179, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3900 times:

What do you think this photograph
thanks

http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/5810/provaskydsc8803.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 180, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3894 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 173):
What do you think this photograph

A bit soft and a lot of compression. Otherwise should be ok.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 181, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3877 times:

what do you think
these two photographs
thanks

http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/5097/cosmodsc0948.jpg

http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/9600/belleairpr8687.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 182, posted (2 years 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3860 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 175):
what do you think
these two photographs

First is soft; second should be ok.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 183, posted (2 years 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3840 times:

What do you think this photograph
thanks

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/3285/asianacargo8825.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 184, posted (2 years 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3837 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 177):
What do you think this photograph

Looks a little soft.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 185, posted (2 years 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3813 times:

now
thanks



http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/7251/asianacargobisdsc8825.jpg

[Edited 2012-09-11 12:55:45]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 186, posted (2 years 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3807 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 179):
now

Still a bit soft, and noticeable compression now.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 187, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3786 times:

so
thanks

http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/9999/asicargodsc8825.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 188, posted (2 years 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3782 times:

Quoting boing (Reply 181):
so

Slightly better.


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 189, posted (2 years 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3771 times:

let's try this other picture
what do you think
thanks


http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/4647/dhldsc0896.jpg


User currently offlineboing From Italy, joined Nov 2011, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 190, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3713 times:

or better with less saturation
thanks

http://imageshack.us/a/img513/1678/dhlmenosatdsc0896.jpg