Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Post Screening: Motive  
User currently offlineseajet001 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2006, 5 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 650 times:

This was rejected for Motive, and previously rejected for contrast before that.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/duncanmonk/6944659308/in/photostream

A few days after this was rejected another photographers shot from the side showing just the boom and none of the aircraft was accepted. Confused!

Thoughts?

Thanks

Dunk


seajet001
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 644 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would refer to the comments left with the rejection. If you did not receive them, let me know, and I can pass them along.

User currently offlineseajet001 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2006, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 593 times:

Yes the comments would be helpful, than you.


seajet001
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 570 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting seajet001 (Reply 2):
Yes the comments would be helpful, than you.

I'll assume that wasn't meant to be a sarcastic reply (would be MORE helpful than you), but just a missing 'k' (thanK you)  

The comments given with the rejection were "motive, too tight crop". If you compare yours to the other taken at the same time you alluded to (I'm assuming you were referring to Mr. Gould's), then it should make a bit more sense now.


User currently offlineseajet001 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2006, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 525 times:

Hi

Thanks for posting the rejection comments, duly noted.

Yes the 'K' was missed off, apologies , it does read sarcastic without the 'K' doesnt it!

Regards

Dunk



seajet001
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Post Screening: Motive
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format