MLP86 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2011, 47 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (1 year 1 month 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3556 times:
It is a bit curious, the antennas are pin sharp, but the leading edge of the winglet is problematic. I've got another frame but with less aircraft visible it wouldn't fit on this site. So I made another try and added also a bit brightness. Would be a pity if it doesn't make it because I like the motive very much (but that doesn't matter I think ).
MLP86 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2011, 47 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2798 times:
Thank you for the explanation, it's really helpful for me to collect experience. And yes you're absolutely right. In this case I already used ISO1250 and additional pushed it in post-processing about 1EV - so when I think right, yes, there are really better shots online - no problem.
MLP86 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2011, 47 posts, RR: 0 Reply 19, posted (9 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2238 times:
can someone with a reliable monitor look if the color of this photo is ok now? My monitor is not professionally calibrated, so I have to rely on the AWB of my cam...
In the rejection there was no remark, only the tag color. It could have been a bit yellow, I have tried to correct that:
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7238 posts, RR: 32 Reply 20, posted (9 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2224 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
A bit yellow, but the bigger problem is the contrast. In fact, checking the logs, this had been rejected twice for contrast, and it looks like you've made minimal to no change to the contrast between the two images. I suggest you do something to address that if you decide to attempt the image again.
MLP86 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2011, 47 posts, RR: 0 Reply 23, posted (9 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2191 times:
so that brings light into darkness. Am I right that the contrast is to high? I thought in the other direction and increased it after the first rejection, did I misunderstood?
HB-JHJ (now with less contrast and corrected white balance):
So I have to ask about a second shot from this sequence. Maybe I over-corrected the contrast issue after this one was rejected first because of low contrast, in the second rejection contrast was complained without notice so I increased it again. You can have a look: