frankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 99 posts, RR: 0 Posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4382 times:
Hello
I wonder of the image below would be fine in terms of centering, that is, I centered only the aircraft and not the aircraft plus its partial reflection.
The reflection shows only a limited part of the aircraft (looks like 50% or less) so I ignored it during centering.
Rejected for:
Dark
Level (personal note: needs CW rotation)
I can see the Dark issue, but I've trouble with finding the Level issue.
I used the horizon as a levelling criterium, and the verticals (the lamppost rising behind the aircraft and the little building near the right) appear to be in balance.
Any pointers near the levelling solution are greatly appreciated
I levelled using the verticals on the buildings, but the pole still leans a bit to the left.
However, correcting for this pole, would make the all other background verticals lean to the right.
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7238 posts, RR: 32 Reply 11, posted (1 year 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4168 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Quoting frankc (Reply 10): Would it have sufficient quality to in order to get accepted?
The color and contrast need to fixed up, but it could be salvageable. If it's your friend's, he will need to be the one who uploads it; you can't upload it from your account if it doesn't belong to you.
frankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 99 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days ago) and read 4132 times:
Hi Dana
Referring to our conversation about my friend's photo: at present he doesn't has an account.
Therefore, would it be acceptable - in terms of legality - if I put in the comment field a reference to his name?
Thank you for your help!
Frank
Airliners.net policy states that you have to be the person that must have taken the picture Frank An account is free on here, so I wouldn't see a reason for him not to register.
frankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 99 posts, RR: 0 Reply 15, posted (1 year 1 week 5 days ago) and read 4125 times:
Hi Tom
Thank you for your reply - that confirms what I was deducing from the terms of legality.
I will get him to create his own account.
Cheers from Antwerp
If I would rotate this further cw, the verticals would begin lean to the right (I assume the screener(s) were using the lightpole in the middle as reference).
However, as the photos were taken with the sun quite high in the sky, the exposure and contrast still look somehow problematic to me (especially when compared with existing images of the same aircraft).
I'm not quite sure if it would fit to the A.net standards at all?
frankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 99 posts, RR: 0 Reply 24, posted (1 year 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4046 times:
Thank you for the feedback, Dana and Tom!
Cheers,
Frank
25 frankc: Hi I find it quite challenging to center this Beaver properly, so any feedback is welcome. http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/f1337531473.4934fr
27 frankc: Hello Would this image be passable in terms of level? I used the horizon as primary reference, but since the pole behind the airplane is not perpendic
28 frankc: Additionally, I'd like some information regarding the field "Operator" for this one: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../p1337790975.3651frankc_n5
29 Tomskii: as far as my intel goes it is privately owned (and I do not know the private owner as he/she is not listed at all)
30 dlowwa: Seems ok. Title is not the operator. Title is what it says on the aircraft, which is why most private aircraft are titled 'Untitled' rather than 'Pri
31 frankc: Hi, Would this photo be suitable in terms of vertical centering and noise/grain? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/r1338064710.865frankc_fhaav
32 dlowwa: It is too high. There is some slight noise noticeable, but I think it should be ok.
33 frankc: Hello, I'm not quite sure about this image, in terms of color,exposure and contrast. It was shot in the late evening and I hoped to get a nice lightin
35 frankc: Hello again, The elevator of this Falcon 50 seems to vanish into the sky - I guess it's caused by the angle of the camera relative to the aircraft : h
37 frankc: Hi, Would it be possible to have a second opinion for this Beech 350 please? Personally I think it's a bit grainy/soft in places. http://www.airliners
38 dlowwa: A little noisy, but shouldn't be a problem. I don't see it as being soft.
39 frankc: Hello Does this image feels ok in terms of Saturation and Color (White) Balance? The original photo was made using an ExpoDisc and hence I didn't touc
41 frankc: Thanks Dana, could I also ask the same question on this one? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../b1340573344.1531frankc_n351cc.jpg Thanks a mil! F
42 dlowwa: Maybe a touch blue, but should be fine.
43 frankc: Hi, This image was rejected for both Soft and Dark. I've difficulties with identifying the area(s) leading to these rejection categories so I'd be gra
44 frankc: Hi, Please disregard my previous post - I'll appeal, and, in case of rejection confirmation, trying a make-over. Cheers, Frank
45 Tomskii: Well I'll still give you the feedback though. Dark looks a bit weird to me but maybe adding a touch of exposure might help. As for soft: I'm still loo
46 frankc: Cheers Tom, the head screener confirmed that the image indeed lacks some brightness so I'll take it back to the drawing board Greetz, Frank
47 frankc: Hi, Would this one be acceptable in terms of vertical centering? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/c1341841164.916frankc_spyve.jpg Thanks! Fra
49 frankc: Hi, Would this image be passable in terms of color/saturation and exposure? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/r1345721198.8348frankc_hbimj.jpg
50 dlowwa: Should be. I might crop it a bit wider though.
51 frankc: Hello again! Looking at this image below, http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/j1346712918.9862vc-2.jpg Would this be passable in terms of Con
52 dlowwa: I would brighten it a bit, and bring the contrast down.
53 frankc: Hi, I'd like to request some info/feedback on the following rejection: Rejection reasons 1) Soft 2) Color (blue tint) http://www.airliners.net/addphot
55 frankc: Hello again I've posted 2 images in the queue: same aircraft, same date. Are these photos likely to be sufficient different in order to avoid a double
56 dlowwa: No, they will be considered double, so please upload only one. First one has nicer light, I would go with that one.
57 frankc: Hi I've made a quick-and dirty edit of an image: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...g/ready/h1347553328.3717eirja1.jpg I'd like to check for 2 iss
58 dlowwa: A little bright, but should be passable; crop on right ok, but better wider on left not to cut stab.
59 frankc: Hi These images seem to have some issues - would it be possible to point to the areas involved please? Rejected for softness http://www.airliners.net/
60 dlowwa: First is a little soft on the left side/tail area, second is borderline, the cheatlines are making it look oversharpened. Maybe just the horizontal st
61 frankc: Hi again, I was just wondering if this one would suit in terms of vertical centering please? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/j1348323831.5255
63 frankc: Hi, The top of the roof of the hangar behind the aircraft in the image below looks a bit like a thick halo, and it's probably even more emphasized by
64 dlowwa: Not sure what you mean, but I don't see the hangar being an issue.
65 frankc: Thanks Dana - it's just the top of the hangar that looked smudged to me. Cheers Frank
66 frankc: Hello, This is a scanned photo - I've no significant experience with this type of image processing so I'd be grateful for your feedback! http://www.ai
67 dlowwa: That's not too bad for a scan. A touch soft & grainy, but should be acceptable. The only real problem is the poor light, but that has nothing to d
68 frankc: Hi If I would crop this image tighter, I'd be able to get rid of the lightpole on the left, but this would still leave a large bright area though. So
70 frankc: Hi I received a rejection a while ago for color cast (green/cyan) and dark. I did a few corrections and I think the color feels better now. However I
72 frankc: Hello I inserted this image in the queue: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../t1364988725.6364frankc_n317mj.jpg However the large version of the i
73 dlowwa: That size is at the minimum, but is acceptable. Can't really comment as I can only see the one you've uploaded, though it doesn't appear to be too so
74 frankc: Thanks Dana, I checked at another PC, the image stretches to the original size hence it must be an issue on my local machine. Cheers Frank
Sponsor Message: 
From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 99 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 8209 posts, 
From Canada, joined Mar 2009, 804 posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
![_](javascript:compressPost('363990','2','1','17','frankc','Hello I got this image rejected for level ("needs cw rotation") http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...10_c1335909162.276frankc_dcawu.jpg If I would r','3')){kind=link}