Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre/Post-Screening (frankc)  
User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 5200 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello

I wonder of the image below would be fine in terms of centering, that is, I centered only the aircraft and not the aircraft plus its partial reflection.
The reflection shows only a limited part of the aircraft (looks like 50% or less) so I ignored it during centering.

Any opinions appreciated!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/j1335305529.9482omvrd.jpg

PS please ignore other possible issues with the image, this is only a limited edit.

Best regards,
Frank Clautier

77 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10047 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5186 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would probably raise it just a bit in the frame, but it might be OK the way it is.


"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinealevik From Canada, joined Mar 2009, 1036 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5185 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Centering looks passable to me. There are other issues but as you noted not a final edit.


Improvise, adapt, overcome.
User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5153 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks guys!

I eliminated some noise and oversharpened edges, along with a color correction.

Before:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/j1335305529.9482omvrd.jpg

After:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/e1335370416.741frankc_omvrd2.jpg

Cheers,
Frank


User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 5 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5120 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi
I've currently 2 uploads in the queue of the same aircraft:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/e1335370416.741frankc_omvrd2.jpg
and
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...335564504.0476frankc_omvrd_day.jpg

Both pictures are taken on a different date.

Would these to be subject to a "Double" rejection?

Thanks!
Frank Clautier


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10047 posts, RR: 26
Reply 5, posted (2 years 5 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5112 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting frankc (Reply 4):
Would these to be subject to a "Double" rejection?

Nope. Even if taken on the same date, they'd be fine, as they're showing opposite sides of the aircraft.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 5 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5089 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Many thanks Vik!

A separate issue is this rejection which I've got recently.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...5_u1334594724.9077frankc_hbaff.jpg

Rejected for:
Dark
Level (personal note: needs CW rotation)

I can see the Dark issue, but I've trouble with finding the Level issue.

I used the horizon as a levelling criterium, and the verticals (the lamppost rising behind the aircraft and the little building near the right) appear to be in balance.

Any pointers near the levelling solution are greatly appreciated  

Cheers!
Frank Clautier


User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 5 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5057 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi

Would this one be ok for level?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/i1335885107.398frankc_dcawu.jpg

I levelled using the verticals on the buildings, but the pole still leans a bit to the left.
However, correcting for this pole, would make the all other background verticals lean to the right.

Cheers
Frank


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 8, posted (2 years 5 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5048 times:

Maybe a touch more ccw, based on the buildings. The pole would be misleading, so you are right to ignore it.

User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 5 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5046 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thank you Dana.

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 8):
Maybe a touch more ccw, based on the buildings.

Yes I can see it now - it will be like 0.1degrees or the like.

Cheers,
Frank Clautier


User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5007 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello

A friend found this photo,taken somewhere in the seventies, in his archive.
Would it have sufficient quality to in order to get accepted?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...w1336148914.4958frankc_spantax.jpg

Cheers,
Frank


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 11, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4986 times:

Quoting frankc (Reply 10):
Would it have sufficient quality to in order to get accepted?

The color and contrast need to fixed up, but it could be salvageable. If it's your friend's, he will need to be the one who uploads it; you can't upload it from your account if it doesn't belong to you.


User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 4975 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi Dana , thank you for your feedback - I will let him know.
Best regards,
Frank Clautier


User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4950 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi Dana
Referring to our conversation about my friend's photo: at present he doesn't has an account.
Therefore, would it be acceptable - in terms of legality - if I put in the comment field a reference to his name?
Thank you for your help!
Frank


User currently offlineTomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4946 times:

Quoting frankc (Reply 13):

Airliners.net policy states that you have to be the person that must have taken the picture Frank   An account is free on here, so I wouldn't see a reason for him not to register.  



Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4943 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi Tom
Thank you for your reply - that confirms what I was deducing from the terms of legality.
I will get him to create his own account.
Cheers from Antwerp  


User currently offlineTomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4940 times:

Quoting frankc (Reply 15):

Cheers from Leuven back haha ;D



Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4923 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello

I got this image rejected for level ("needs cw rotation")

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...10_c1335909162.276frankc_dcawu.jpg

If I would rotate this further cw, the verticals would begin lean to the right (I assume the screener(s) were using the lightpole in the middle as reference).

Any suggestions welcome  

Thanks!
Frank


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 18, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4912 times:

Quoting frankc (Reply 17):

Looks level to me. Maybe try appealing.


User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 4892 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello

I've got a shot of a Global Express, with quite some issues (overexposed,softness,dirty):

Rejected image
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...8_w1335782804.3278frankc_ecleb.jpg

So I worked on another photo, with different camera settings:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/c1336858600.2948frankc_ecleb.jpg

However, as the photos were taken with the sun quite high in the sky, the exposure and contrast still look somehow problematic to me (especially when compared with existing images of the same aircraft).
I'm not quite sure if it would fit to the A.net standards at all?

Cheers,
Frank


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 20, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 4888 times:

Newer one is better, and should have a chance.

User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4879 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello again,

Would the exposure of this Beech 200 be problematic (especially near the nose) ?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/n1337095762.3585frankc_omtaa.jpg

Thank you for your help,
Frank Clautier


User currently offlineTomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4872 times:

Don't think it would be a problem, however I'm giving dana the final call  


Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 23, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4867 times:

Maybe a bit bright, but not too bad. It is a bit oversharpened and low in the frame though.

User currently offlinefrankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4864 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thank you for the feedback, Dana and Tom!
Cheers,
Frank


25 Post contains links frankc : Hi I find it quite challenging to center this Beaver properly, so any feedback is welcome. http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/f1337531473.4934fr
26 dlowwa : Centering looks fine to me.
27 Post contains links frankc : Hello Would this image be passable in terms of level? I used the horizon as primary reference, but since the pole behind the airplane is not perpendic
28 Post contains links frankc : Additionally, I'd like some information regarding the field "Operator" for this one: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../p1337790975.3651frankc_n5
29 Tomskii : as far as my intel goes it is privately owned (and I do not know the private owner as he/she is not listed at all)
30 dlowwa : Seems ok. Title is not the operator. Title is what it says on the aircraft, which is why most private aircraft are titled 'Untitled' rather than 'Pri
31 frankc : Thanks for the info Dana and Tom! Cheers Frank
32 Post contains links frankc : Hi, Would this photo be suitable in terms of vertical centering and noise/grain? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/r1338064710.865frankc_fhaav
33 dlowwa : It is too high. There is some slight noise noticeable, but I think it should be ok.
34 Post contains links frankc : Hello, I'm not quite sure about this image, in terms of color,exposure and contrast. It was shot in the late evening and I hoped to get a nice lightin
35 dlowwa : Should be ok.
36 Post contains links frankc : Hello again, The elevator of this Falcon 50 seems to vanish into the sky - I guess it's caused by the angle of the camera relative to the aircraft : h
37 dlowwa : Seems ok for sharpness.
38 Post contains links frankc : Hi, Would it be possible to have a second opinion for this Beech 350 please? Personally I think it's a bit grainy/soft in places. http://www.airliners
39 dlowwa : A little noisy, but shouldn't be a problem. I don't see it as being soft.
40 Post contains links frankc : Hello Does this image feels ok in terms of Saturation and Color (White) Balance? The original photo was made using an ExpoDisc and hence I didn't touc
41 dlowwa : Color should be fine.
42 Post contains links frankc : Thanks Dana, could I also ask the same question on this one? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../b1340573344.1531frankc_n351cc.jpg Thanks a mil! F
43 dlowwa : Maybe a touch blue, but should be fine.
44 Post contains links frankc : Hi, This image was rejected for both Soft and Dark. I've difficulties with identifying the area(s) leading to these rejection categories so I'd be gra
45 frankc : Hi, Please disregard my previous post - I'll appeal, and, in case of rejection confirmation, trying a make-over. Cheers, Frank
46 Tomskii : Well I'll still give you the feedback though. Dark looks a bit weird to me but maybe adding a touch of exposure might help. As for soft: I'm still loo
47 Post contains images frankc : Cheers Tom, the head screener confirmed that the image indeed lacks some brightness so I'll take it back to the drawing board Greetz, Frank
48 Post contains links frankc : Hi, Would this one be acceptable in terms of vertical centering? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/c1341841164.916frankc_spyve.jpg Thanks! Fra
49 dlowwa : Should be.
50 Post contains links frankc : Hi, Would this image be passable in terms of color/saturation and exposure? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/r1345721198.8348frankc_hbimj.jpg
51 dlowwa : Should be. I might crop it a bit wider though.
52 Post contains links frankc : Hello again! Looking at this image below, http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/j1346712918.9862vc-2.jpg Would this be passable in terms of Con
53 dlowwa : I would brighten it a bit, and bring the contrast down.
54 Post contains links frankc : Hi, I'd like to request some info/feedback on the following rejection: Rejection reasons 1) Soft 2) Color (blue tint) http://www.airliners.net/addphot
55 dlowwa : Sharpness ok, but color is off.
56 Post contains links frankc : Hello again I've posted 2 images in the queue: same aircraft, same date. Are these photos likely to be sufficient different in order to avoid a double
57 dlowwa : No, they will be considered double, so please upload only one. First one has nicer light, I would go with that one.
58 Post contains links frankc : Hi I've made a quick-and dirty edit of an image: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...g/ready/h1347553328.3717eirja1.jpg I'd like to check for 2 iss
59 dlowwa : A little bright, but should be passable; crop on right ok, but better wider on left not to cut stab.
60 Post contains links frankc : Hi These images seem to have some issues - would it be possible to point to the areas involved please? Rejected for softness http://www.airliners.net/
61 dlowwa : First is a little soft on the left side/tail area, second is borderline, the cheatlines are making it look oversharpened. Maybe just the horizontal st
62 Post contains links frankc : Hi again, I was just wondering if this one would suit in terms of vertical centering please? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/j1348323831.5255
63 dlowwa : A little high, but should be passable.
64 Post contains links frankc : Hi, The top of the roof of the hangar behind the aircraft in the image below looks a bit like a thick halo, and it's probably even more emphasized by
65 dlowwa : Not sure what you mean, but I don't see the hangar being an issue.
66 frankc : Thanks Dana - it's just the top of the hangar that looked smudged to me. Cheers Frank
67 Post contains links frankc : Hello, This is a scanned photo - I've no significant experience with this type of image processing so I'd be grateful for your feedback! http://www.ai
68 dlowwa : That's not too bad for a scan. A touch soft & grainy, but should be acceptable. The only real problem is the poor light, but that has nothing to d
69 Post contains links frankc : Hi If I would crop this image tighter, I'd be able to get rid of the lightpole on the left, but this would still leave a large bright area though. So
70 dlowwa : Crop should be fine.
71 Post contains links frankc : Hi I received a rejection a while ago for color cast (green/cyan) and dark. I did a few corrections and I think the color feels better now. However I
72 dlowwa : Should be ok.
73 Post contains links and images frankc : Hello I inserted this image in the queue: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../t1364988725.6364frankc_n317mj.jpg However the large version of the i
74 dlowwa : That size is at the minimum, but is acceptable. Can't really comment as I can only see the one you've uploaded, though it doesn't appear to be too so
75 frankc : Thanks Dana, I checked at another PC, the image stretches to the original size hence it must be an issue on my local machine. Cheers Frank
76 Post contains links frankc : Hello It has been quite a while since my last upload. Looking for feedback on this one: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/h1397249718.6639frank
77 powwwiii : looks maybe just a tad dark, but not too much.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Pre/Post-Screening (frankc)
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format