frankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 99 posts, RR: 0 Posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4845 times:
I wonder of the image below would be fine in terms of centering, that is, I centered only the aircraft and not the aircraft plus its partial reflection.
The reflection shows only a limited part of the aircraft (looks like 50% or less) so I ignored it during centering.
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 32 Reply 11, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4631 times:
Quoting frankc (Reply 10): Would it have sufficient quality to in order to get accepted?
The color and contrast need to fixed up, but it could be salvageable. If it's your friend's, he will need to be the one who uploads it; you can't upload it from your account if it doesn't belong to you.
frankc From Belgium, joined Oct 2011, 99 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (1 year 7 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4595 times:
Referring to our conversation about my friend's photo: at present he doesn't has an account.
Therefore, would it be acceptable - in terms of legality - if I put in the comment field a reference to his name?
Thank you for your help!
However, as the photos were taken with the sun quite high in the sky, the exposure and contrast still look somehow problematic to me (especially when compared with existing images of the same aircraft).
I'm not quite sure if it would fit to the A.net standards at all?