whales From Zimbabwe, joined Oct 2006, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 00:30:58 UTC (2 years 8 months 3 days ago) and read 695 times:
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT
What was the picture rejected for? Without that we can not help you.
Soaring1972 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 01:07:50 UTC (2 years 8 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 686 times:
I, and my fans of my pictures, have obviously a differnet style and meaning about taking pictures than the screeners have!
And your answer is interesting! If obviously something is wrong with the picture you should be able to find out what is wrong! So if you would have the information you only bring an influenced oppinion!!!
vikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10357 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 01:09:43 UTC (2 years 8 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 685 times:
The plane in the foreground looks slightly soft to my eyes, but the 2nd and 3rd planes look a bit oversharpened.
That said, are we supposed to guess what it was rejected for? Could be kinda fun.....
How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
dazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 01:39:09 UTC (2 years 8 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 679 times:
Quoting vikkyvik ( Reply 3): The plane in the foreground looks slightly soft to my eyes, but the 2nd and 3rd planes look a bit oversharpened.
That was my first impression too.
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
aussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1758 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 02:16:05 UTC (2 years 8 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 672 times:
Image was rejected for being soft and I agree with the rejection,It does looks quite soft.