whales From Zimbabwe, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 00:30:58 UTC (3 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 745 times:
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT
What was the picture rejected for? Without that we can not help you.
Soaring1972 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 01:07:50 UTC (3 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 736 times:
I, and my fans of my pictures, have obviously a differnet style and meaning about taking pictures than the screeners have!
And your answer is interesting! If obviously something is wrong with the picture you should be able to find out what is wrong! So if you would have the information you only bring an influenced oppinion!!!
vikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 11479 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 01:09:43 UTC (3 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 735 times:
The plane in the foreground looks slightly soft to my eyes, but the 2nd and 3rd planes look a bit oversharpened.
That said, are we supposed to guess what it was rejected for? Could be kinda fun.....
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
dazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2956 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 01:39:09 UTC (3 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 729 times:
Quoting vikkyvik ( Reply 3): The plane in the foreground looks slightly soft to my eyes, but the 2nd and 3rd planes look a bit oversharpened.
That was my first impression too.
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
aussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1776 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted
Mon Apr 30 2012 02:16:05 UTC (3 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 722 times:
Image was rejected for being soft and I agree with the rejection,It does looks quite soft.