Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre & Post Screening--- Comments & Critics Welcome  
User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3732 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Sorry have to open a new thread, old thread was locked again.

Please comment on this new upload, see if it is ok, thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/i1336279647.1415dsc_9756-3.jpg

84 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinestrangr From Australia, joined Apr 2012, 110 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3703 times:

I am no expert but a bit of ccw rotation is needed. Maybe a bit tighter crop. Mind you, i've only just got my first picture up.

User currently offline207p From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3697 times:

Yes a tighter crop and looks a tad soft to me, just one pass of USM would help.

User currently onlineMaximLezin From Canada, joined Jun 2011, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3674 times:

Hi, Definetly some CCW, but to be honest guys, I dont see how a tighter crop would be possible here, especially since its a fixed ratio were working with. Another thing that perhaps may be an issue, is that it might be just a tad bright. Almost as if the top part of the fuselage is a little blown out. Other than that its very nice!  

[Edited 2012-05-06 07:52:35]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3649 times:

Quoting strangr (Reply 1):
Maybe a bit tighter crop.
Quoting 207p (Reply 2):
Yes a tighter crop

It does NOT need to be cropped any tighter.

Quoting strangr (Reply 1):
a bit of ccw rotation is needed
Quoting MaximLezin (Reply 3):
Definetly some CCW

The level is fine.

The only problem is the poor light/contrast, which is making it look a little soft. This may not be fixable, as it looks somewhat toplit.


User currently onlineMaximLezin From Canada, joined Jun 2011, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3637 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 4):
The level is fine.

Although it isnt bad - it does in my opinion need a tad bit of CCW leveling. Then again, just the way I see it, and the way Id be happier if I were sending it in.  


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3633 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks for all the input. As expected, Dana has sharp eyes! It was a cloudy day, lighting was not great. I think both crop and level are fine.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3587 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

OK, just got this one rejected for level, and the comment is "CCW needed". I knew this one is difficult with level, what is your opinion on this? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ame=r1335710768.9837dsc_8827-3.jpg


User currently onlineMaximLezin From Canada, joined Jun 2011, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3583 times:

Hi! Well the level on that one isnt too bad, but is in need of some CCW rotation. You can tell because the verticals of the building are leaning inward. It should be a quick and easy fix!  

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3514 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks for everyone's input.

I do not have any cockpit shots in DB yet, now try with these two, any comments? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/j1337137028.7087dsc_9883-2.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/m1337135874.8638dsc_9874.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 10, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3493 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 9):
do not have any cockpit shots in DB yet, now try with these two

Not the best motives. The first has too much blown-out/out-of-focus space to the sides, and the second a distracting crop at the top and bottom.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3478 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana.

Now these two are re-submission, this first one NK was rejected for soft and second one AA was for grainy and dirty. Please take a look and see if they are better now, thanks!


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/e1337216704.1502dsc_6076-3.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/q1337217125.4827dsc_6748-3.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 12, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3453 times:

The AA seems a bit dark/flat, but otherwise they seem ok.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 6 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3425 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana.

Please comment on this re-submission, the original one was rejected for over-exposure, how about now? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/n1337983349.5661dsc_9872-7.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 14, posted (2 years 6 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3419 times:

Not the best light and seems a bit yellow, but might be passable.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 6 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3410 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, I adjusted the color on that Robinson and re-submitted.

Here I have this Southwest 7373, the lighting was not good, cloudy day, I am just wondering if it has any chance to be accepted, thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/n1338036481.0531dsc_9746-2.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 16, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3390 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 15):
Here I have this Southwest 737

Quite dark, so its chances wouldn't be good.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3375 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, trying two more which I think is a bit difficult.

The first one is a navy heritage flight, I have to crop quite a bit, so don't know if it can make it.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/z1338123338.6054dsc_7057-4.jpg

The second one is hard to make it level, no reliable reference.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/o1338123672.4804dsc_9890.jpg

What do you think? Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 18, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3366 times:

First has some soft/blurry spots (Corsair & Bug), but might be passable; second one is dark.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3330 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana!

Please comments on these two new uploads.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/q1338858229.373dsc_0446-4.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/l1338859058.8517dsc_0786-2.jpg

thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 20, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3310 times:

1. Nice, though would be better at 4:3
2. Very marg light, and might need a bit of cw though hard to be certain


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3300 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, I just re-edited the sea harrier, so this is the new edition,

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/d1338946438.1493dsc_0446-8.jpg

The older edition is :

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/q1338858229.373dsc_0446-4.jpg

So which one is better and to keep? Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 22, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3289 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 21):
Thanks Dana, I just re-edited the sea harrier, so this is the new edition,

I actually liked the wider one, but with a 4:3 crop. This one is not only 4:3, but tighter.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 21):

The older edition is :

Not visible, though the link above still works.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3265 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thanks Dana, here is a new upload of a C-17, again the lighting was not ideal, just want to see if it has a chance, thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/k1339388866.0099dsc_0797.jpg

Also, I did not know the flash flare is a problem, now I know, got this one rejected.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...610_m1338782904.4757dsc_0790-2.jpg


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3241 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Just saw this cockpit shot, also shows some flash flare, maybe not as severe as I had? any comment?

http://www.airliners.net/photo/AirBr...d=272d77224688c1bc3c5aed69ac38d11d

My rejected one:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20120610_m1338782904.4757dsc_0790-2.jpg

[Edited 2012-06-12 09:27:55]

[Edited 2012-06-12 09:28:43]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 25, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3237 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 23):
just want to see if it has a chance,

Chance, yes. Whether that chance will be a good one, well..

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 24):
Just saw this cockpit shot, also shows some flash flare, maybe not as severe as I had? any comment?

Not as bad as yours, and even so, we generally don't like to compound mistakes with an image possibly added in error by adding another bad one.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3213 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I see, Dana thanks!

Just got this one rejected for too yellow and low contrast, reedited and submitted, please see if the new one is any better, thanks!

Rejected one : http://ww.airliners.net/addphotos/re...612_w1338859254.5195dsc_0028-2.jpg

New upload : http://ww.airliners.net/addphotos/bi...ady/j1339560977.1407dsc_0028-3.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 27, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3229 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 26):
Just got this one rejected for too yellow and low contrast, reedited and submitted, please see if the new one is any better, thanks!

Don't see an issue with the color, but the contrast isn't any better (probably worse in fact), it just looks brighter.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3188 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thanks Dana, just had these two new uploads, but not sure about their qualities, please comment, thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/y1340071846.3917dsc_1044.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/r1340072278.5846dsc_1002.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 29, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3178 times:

Chopper looks like there's a bit of haze; the close crop of the damaged prop looks ok for quality, but will likely be debated for motive.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3153 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, just a bit confused that the comment about motive for the damaged prop, I think it would be difficult to see the damage if I framed in the whole aircraft, so I did a close up. Or generally a damaged prop is not something amounts for a motive? thanks!

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (2 years 5 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3086 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi there, I just have two new uploads, would like to have some feedbacks, what do you think? I mostly worry about the contrast.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../ready/x1340755804.713dsc_1166.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/i1340760966.7853dsc_1144-3.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 32, posted (2 years 5 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3078 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 30):
Or generally a damaged prop is not something amounts for a motive? thanks!

Just not the best angle.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 31):
I just have two new uploads

Both a little bright, especially the first.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (2 years 5 months 23 hours ago) and read 3032 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thanks Dana!

just had this rejection for "motive, gear blocked", but it is by the door of the aircraft! so I think this rejection is questionable, what do you think?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20628_m1340281425.3017dsc_0926.jpg

Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 34, posted (2 years 5 months 21 hours ago) and read 3029 times:

Integral stairs shouldn't cause a motive rejection. You can appeal this.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2964 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, that one was appealed and accepted. Here are two new upload, please comment.

First one I worry about contrast, etc. http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/e1341406317.5811dsc_0805-2.jpg

Second one is dark? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/t1341406678.4721dsc_1187.jpg

Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 36, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 35):
First one I worry about contrast

A bit harsh, but motive would be more of a concern.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 35):
Second one is dark?

Don't think so.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2892 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thank you Dana!

Just got a lot of rejections for "soft", there are processed with the normal process I use now, which I found works most of time, but don't understand why suddenly they are soft now, so please provide a second opinion, thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20706_x1340935360.8952dsc_2137.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...706_q1340886987.3646dsc_2127-4.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...706_i1340936275.9062dsc_2141-2.jpg

and this one for level and cyan cast?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20706_c1340935555.0478dsc_1034.jpg

Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 38, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2884 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 37):
Just got a lot of rejections for "soft"

Sharpness looks passable to me.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2773 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, some were appealed and accepted.

Here is new upload, please comment, motive problem because wheels? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/z1342214241.9965dsc_1439.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 40, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2759 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 39):
motive problem because wheels?

Should be ok. Keep an eye on the main photography forum for an update on motive/obstruction rules (including vegetation) in the next day or two.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 41, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2732 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, will pay attention to the new rules.

Also, please comment on this new upload, this crop is ok? to include tower in? any other problem?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/b1342359153.1138dsc_1460-2.jpg

and this one? crop? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../ready/v1342359903.827dsc_1411.jpg


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 42, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2713 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi, I just got a picture kind of puzzles me. I hope someone can help me to feel a bit better. so first upload of this one was rejected for yellow tint,

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...706_w1340938517.4869dsc_9207-2.jpg

I thought ok, that is not difficult, I just removed some yellow from it and did not change other settings and resubmitted it as this one

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...715_z1341620385.3539dsc_9207-3.jpg

but this edition was also rejected for "cyan cast, please don't watse our time by uploading rejected images without any change, thank you"

well, it is not the rejected image because I removed the yellow tint (if it had it the first time to begin with, which I don't think so), and I honestly do not want to waste anyone's time! and now Cyan tint?

I guess well, then probably one of these two editions should be fine because it is only the matter of yellow tint or cyan tint, should be only one is correct, it can not be both. so I appealed both of them and hoping one would be ok.

They were both rejected very quickly, for "Little to no difference between the two; color oversaturated on both."

so maybe really the WB was ok, but oversaturated? I can correct that, but I did not enhance the saturation, it was just a deep blue sky on that day. but I can correct, that is fine.

It just this back and forth process makes me feel puzzled. Sorry for whining about it here, just hope someone can make me feel a bit better somehow. Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 43, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2710 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 42):
Hi, I just got a picture kind of puzzles me. I hope someone can help me to feel a bit better.

Colors look nearly identical on both to me, so I can see why there was a re-upload rejection. Can you honestly say there is a big difference between the two?

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 41):
Also, please comment on this new upload, this crop is ok? to include tower in?

I'd put it a little higher.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 41):
and this one? crop?

Should be fine.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week ago) and read 2670 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, for that picture, I de-saturated it then uploaded it, so hope it can be accepted this time.

For the following new one, it has #3 included, so I did not choose the nose categary, this is correct? any other problems with this picture? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/n1342994716.6303dsc_3238.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 45, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2668 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 44):
I did not choose the nose categary, this is correct?

Yes.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 44):
any other problems with this picture?

Bit of an awkward crop, given the portion on the left you decided to include is quite dark, but it might work.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 46, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2649 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thank you Dana! I am thinking to appeal this one, it was rejected for level, and the screener suggested some clockwise rotation, with respect, I don't think it needs that. What do you think? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...120724_v1342359903.827dsc_1411.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 47, posted (2 years 4 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2622 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 46):
I am thinking to appeal this one, it was rejected for level, and the screener suggested some clockwise rotation, with respect, I don't think it needs that. What do you think?

Hard to say either way. Might take a bit of rotation, but not much.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 48, posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2603 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

again, thnak you Dana for the help. Talking about level, I think this new upload is a difficult one, please comment, thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/p1343305517.9531dsc_1655-2.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 49, posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2594 times:

With no vertical references, go with any horizontals and feel.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 50, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2514 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana. Please also comment on this new upload, too dark or any other problems? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/c1343841842.5433dsc_5980-4.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 51, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2511 times:

Not the best light, but you might get away with it.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 52, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2501 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thank you Dana.

I also worry about these two being too dark, a lot of clouds.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/v1343916967.0156dsc_1721.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../ready/u1343917165.207dsc_1726.jpg

what do you think? Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 53, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2498 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 52):
I also worry about these two being too dark

Too dark? First one is bordering on over-exposed. I don't think dark will be an issue with these.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 54, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2448 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana. Now, do you think I can get away with these two new uploads? I know the lighting was not good. Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/l1344113993.8226dsc_2001-3.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/h1344113110.7206dsc_1792-2.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 55, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2391 times:

Second one is a bit sketchy, but the first should be ok for exposure.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 56, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2208 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thank Dana!

re-upload this one, earlier version was rejected for color and soft. Please comment on this new one, better now? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/j1345158695.4833dsc_1852-5.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 57, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2202 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 56):
Please comment on this new one, better now?

Should be passable.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 58, posted (2 years 3 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2088 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thank Dana. A few new uploads, please comment.

UA was rejected for low contrast, overexpose, and soft, here is the new edition

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/e1345690584.9667dsc_2030-4.jpg

JAL was rejected for soft, high in frame and overexpose, this is new edition:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/z1345206890.7301dsc_2001-5.jpg

This AF cargo is a new upload:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/d1345638840.4721dsc_2362-2.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 59, posted (2 years 3 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2078 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 58):
rejected for low contrast, overexpose, and soft, here is the new edition

Not the best light, and looks like some heat haze. You've probably done well with what you've got, but still I wouldn't get your hopes up too much.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 58):
rejected for soft, high in frame and overexpose, this is new edition:

Same as above, though the light is a bit better.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 58):
a new upload:

Should be ok.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 60, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2017 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thank Dana, I have removed the UA from the queue. Please comment on this nose shoot of the same UA, much closer this time, so heat haze should be much better, is it too dark? or too full on the frame? Thanks!

http://ww.airliners.net/addphotos/bi...ady/a1345809877.4698dsc_2035-2.jpg


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 61, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2005 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

And this A319 has been tried a couple times, rejected for contrast and sharpness, so now look fine? thanks!

http://ww.airliners.net/addphotos/bi...ady/d1346026942.7964dsc_1852-7.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 62, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2000 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 60):
Please comment on this nose shoot

Slightly soft and tough light.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 61):
nd this A319 has been tried a couple times, rejected for contrast and sharpness, so now look fine?

Looks oversharpened.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 63, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1883 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thank Dana for all the help.

please comment on these two, first one was rejected for dark and cyan cast, I feel it is bright enough, not sure about the cayn.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...901_d1345778968.0276dsc_1726-2.jpg

next one is a new upload, the aircraft was being pushed back, so the front wheel was blocked partially, motive?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/d1346507291.694dsc_5529-2.jpg

thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 64, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1855 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 63):
first one was rejected for dark and cyan cast,

Not dark, but I do see a slight color cast.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 63):
next one is a new upload,

A bit bright, but tug is not an issue.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 65, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1754 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thanks Dana, please comment on this F-18, sharpness/soft issue? also just above the cockpit, there is some bizzare light distortion or something, I hope this is not an issue, right?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/j1347194976.903dsc_2729-4.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 66, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1742 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 65):
sharpness/soft issue?

Don't see one.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 65):
some bizzare light distortion or something, I hope this is not an issue, right?

Have to admit, it doesn't seem too natural. I assume it's present on the original RAW file?


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 67, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1736 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

yes, that light distortion is present on the RAW. It seems a real thing to me, because it starts right at the cockpit glass, nothing into the cockpit, and it bends slightly forward as it goes up. Not sure what it is, but I believe it is real.

User currently offlineTomskii From Belgium, joined May 2011, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 68, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1734 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 67):
yes, that light distortion is present on the RAW. It seems a real thing to me, because it starts right at the cockpit glass, nothing into the cockpit, and it bends slightly forward as it goes up. Not sure what it is, but I believe it is real.

It does indeed look weird it's not like a scratch on your lens right?



Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 69, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1732 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

no, I don't think my lens has any scratch, and if it is scratch, it can not be so coincident that it starts right at the cockpit glass; plus this is the only time I see this, never seen it before on other pictures.

[Edited 2012-09-09 10:47:29]

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 70, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1722 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 67):
yes, that light distortion is present on the RAW. It seems a real thing to me, because it starts right at the cockpit glass, nothing into the cockpit, and it bends slightly forward as it goes up.

In that case, if the aircraft was traveling at a high rate of speed, it is likely the start of a pressure wave as the sound barrier is approached. See this example:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joerg Amann



If that is the case, you should probably include a note to the screeners indicating as much when you upload it.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 71, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1699 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, seems that's what happened. Like the blue angel, same position, just above the headrest, and only above the cockpit, not below the nose. of course, mine does not have the more abvious shock wave on the tail.

User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 72, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1568 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi everyone, just got a few rejections, need some comments them.

Dark and oversharpened for this one (this is the one i feel should be fine)

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0918_e1347248717.037dsc_2844-2.jpg

Dark and soft for this one, I can see maybe a bit dark, but not sure about the soft.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...918_h1347250705.3297dsc_1907-2.jpg

then soft for this one, really? if so, I might downsize it to 1024.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...918_f1347252789.9372dsc_2872-4.jpg

Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 73, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1562 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 72):

Dark and oversharpened for this one (this is the one i feel should be fine)

Exposure and sharpening should be ok, but I see a strong cyan cast.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 72):
Dark and soft for this one, I can see maybe a bit dark, but not sure about the soft.

Again sharpening looks ok, but not the best light.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 72):
then soft for this one, really?

A bit. Maybe dof issues?


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 74, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1465 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, as always.

Here got a couple rejections for Cyan cast, can someone confirm this? I can not really see it myself.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20924_h1347591854.9647dsc_4414.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...24_y1347599031.2381dsc_2740-11.jpg

And a couple new uploads, any problems with them? color? these were taken at late afternoon/sunset time, light was warm.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/k1348499205.0357dsc_2973.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/m1348499367.3087dsc_3071-2.jpg

Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 75, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1453 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 74):
Here got a couple rejections for Cyan cast

I see a slight cast, yes.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 74):
And a couple new uploads

First is dirty, and second will be a color rejection. Second also shows some vignetting.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 76, posted (2 years 1 month 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1376 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thank Dana.

this one was rejected for "Contrast low, yellow tint soft contrast colour personal"

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...120929_l1348026597.883dsc_3063.jpg

now the following is the new edition of this picture, better now?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/y1348927415.2239dsc_3063-2.jpg

thanks!


User currently offlinemjgbtv From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 893 posts, RR: 0
Reply 77, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1344 times:

Hi,

Both look just about the same to me. It seems quite minor, but I agree that the lettering in the back is probably what got the rejection. I would try to fix the brown 'Welkom'.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 78, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1342 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Seems my thread got more attention?  

Anyway, this is a re-submit too, please check if the color is ok, I am not sure about it, thanks

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/l1348973171.5853dsc_2990-2.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 79, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1308 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 76):
this one was rejected for "Contrast low, yellow tint soft contrast colour personal"

Contrast looks ok, but color still seems a bit off.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 79):
this is a re-submit too

I'm guessing there was an issue with the color/contrast? Light seems a bit..filtered, so dark/flat with a yellow cast.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 80, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1290 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

thanks Dana, I changed the color temperature, cool it down a bit to get these, now the color looks better and passable? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/q1349138336.7156dsc_3063-3.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/y1349138747.9432dsc_3071.jpg


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 81, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1213 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi, got both of these pictures rejected for Cyan cast, I have corrected that on one of them, but still have cyan cast? Thanks!

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...004_a1348536442.9536dsc_3083-3.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...04_h1348549908.9129dsc_2740-13.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 82, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1211 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 80):
now the color looks better and passable?

Still borderline, but maybe it's just the light.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 81):
Hi, got both of these pictures rejected for Cyan cast, I have corrected that on one of them, but still have cyan cast?

Still seem a bit cyan. A cyan cast usually means they need a bit more red.


User currently offlinepowwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 83, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1186 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thanks Dana, for those two with cyan tint, I try to correct them, please see if they are better now.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/k1349399785.9216dsc_2740-15.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/u1349399904.5973dsc_3083-4.jpg

and the next two are new uploads, any problem with them? soft/OS or dark?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/u1349353705.5745dsc_6208.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/a1349400810.077dsc_6195-3.jpg

Thanks!


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 84, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1182 times:

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 83):
please see if they are better now

Should be ok now.

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 83):
the next two are new uploads

Don't see any major issues.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Pre & Post Screening--- Comments & Critics Welcome
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format