Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre-Screening (Gianni Deligny)  
User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2898 times:

Hey folks,

I've recently uploaded these & would like your opinion on their chances for acceptance.

Regards,

G   

1 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....9425skb_14jul2012_0619_edited.jpg

2 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....0063anu_06jul2012_1738_edited.jpg

3 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....8197anu_01jul2012_1438_edited.jpg

4 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....6334slu_22jun2012_1653_edited.jpg

5 - http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....0593anu_13jul2012_1408_edited.jpg

54 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2892 times:

First should be ok; middle three are borderline for the light; last is soft.

User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2887 times:

Thanks very much Dana!

 


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2873 times:

Re-upload (High In Frame):

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....3079eis_29jun2012_0639_edited.jpg

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2868 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 3):
Re-upload (High In Frame):

Should be ok.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2826 times:

Does this one stand a chance?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....3451bgi_07jul2012_0736_edited.jpg

Thanks in advance.

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2819 times:

Bit dark, but quality looks ok otherwise.

User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2786 times:

Very tough light with this one, however a rare shot. Anything I could do to help it into the database?

Best regards,

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....5132anu_25jan2010_1258_edited.jpg

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 8, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2763 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 7):
Anything I could do to help it into the database?

A bit soft, and as you say pretty poor light. Not much you can do to make its chances better than borderline at best.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (2 years 7 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2687 times:

How does this one look? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....6406anu_28jul2012_1609_edited.jpg

Regards,
 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 10, posted (2 years 7 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2682 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 9):
How does this one look?

A touch dark, but otherwise ok.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (2 years 7 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2677 times:

Thanks very much as always Dana  
I'll try brighten it up a little before I upload.

How does this one look?   

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....7964sdq_22jul2012_1310_edited.jpg

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 12, posted (2 years 7 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2665 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 11):
How does this one look?

Also harsh light, but otherwise ok.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2601 times:

Your opinions on the below photo are most welcome..

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....6673bgi_08aug2012_1722_edited.jpg

Regards,
 


User currently offlinegasman From New Zealand, joined Mar 2004, 1045 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2589 times:

Awesome panning, but I suspect the contrasty lighting will probably preclude it from being accepted.

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 15, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2576 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 13):
Your opinions on the below photo are most welcome..

Bit soft in places, but otherwise should be ok.

Quoting gasman (Reply 14):
I suspect the contrasty lighting will probably preclude it from being accepted.

No, it won't.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks ago) and read 2572 times:

Thanks for the great opinions! Especially for your honest input as always Dana  

I had a query regarding the following recent rejections.

Initially rejected for SOFT:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r....4423bgi_17jul2012_1705_edited.jpg

Photo was carefully sharpened with USM & re-uploaded. Sadly rejected for DARK:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r....9632bgi_17jul2012_1705_edited.jpg

I haven't touched the contrast/levels in the 2nd image after the initial rejection. Should I appeal?  

Regards,
 


User currently offlinegasman From New Zealand, joined Mar 2004, 1045 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2569 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 16):
Photo was carefully sharpened with USM & re-uploaded. Sadly rejected for DARK:

I think you've beautifully reflected the prevailing lighting conditions at the time. That said, I do agree the picture would look even better with about 0.25 of a stop more exposure.

They seem harsh on dark. I had this one rejected for dark (also for being too common, which is why I'm not going to resubmit)



User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 18, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2532 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 16):
I haven't touched the contrast/levels in the 2nd image after the initial rejection. Should I appeal?

No, it probably should have been rejected for dark the first time as well. Sorry it was missed.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2511 times:

Ok, I'll work on those!

Have some new material I'd like your views on:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....4453anu_03jul2010_1654_edited.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....1551bgi_17jul2012_1705_edited.jpg - Re-upload (DARK)

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....2227bgi_07jul2012_0736_edited.jpg (Still Grainy?)

Thanks,
G   


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 20, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2505 times:

First is a bit flat, but no major flaws.

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 19):
Re-upload (DARK)

Still dark/poor light.

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 19):
(Still Grainy?)

Noise looks ok, but as with above, looks a little dark.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2497 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 20):
Still dark/poor light.

After a re-edit   :
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....2497bgi_17jul2012_1705_edited.jpg

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 20):
Noise looks ok, but as with above, looks a little dark.

The backlit angle certainly made this one fairly tricky to save. Tried to brighen it one last time before it ends up in the archives  .
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....8631bgi_07jul2012_0736_edited.jpg

Best regards,
G   


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 22, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2492 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 21):
After a re-edit

Not much chance, the contrast is quite harsh.

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 21):
The backlit angle certainly made this one fairly tricky to save. Tried to brighen it one last time before it ends up in the archives

Better, but still borderline dark.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2488 times:

Thanks Dana.

Different angle for JetBlue: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....2269bgi_17jul2012_1706_edited.jpg

Also: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....8465eis_06jul2012_0629_edited.jpg (DARK?)

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 24, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2482 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 23):
Different angle for JetBlue:

Better; still not great.

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 23):
Also:

Also a bit dark/contrasty.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 25, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2467 times:

Ok, thanks.

Re-edited the JetStream: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....1159eis_06jul2012_0629_edited.jpg

Also:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....8403anu_22jun2012_1514_edited.jpg

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 26, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2454 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 25):
Re-edited the JetStream:
Quoting AviatorG (Reply 25):
Also:

Neither have great light, but that shouldn't be an immediate rejection.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 27, posted (2 years 6 months 20 hours ago) and read 2340 times:

Tough light, but any opinions on this one?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....6456geo_08aug2012_1510_edited.jpg

Regards,

Gianni Deligny


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 28, posted (2 years 6 months 17 hours ago) and read 2325 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 27):
any opinions on this one?

It would be rejected for dark.


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2945 posts, RR: 2
Reply 30, posted (2 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 29):
How are these?

1. Looks good on my screen.
2. It's a little noisy (for a.net), especially in the blue areas of the sky.
3. Great panning, only problem I see is a little noise in the sky (for a.net standards)
4. As No3.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 31, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2249 times:

Thanks for your honest opinion Darren! Always appreciated  

How does this one look to you?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....2202slu_31aug2012_1444_edited.jpg

Recently ungraded my 50D to a 7D & I've seen a noticeable increase in my acceptance ratio (also much thanks to imput from you all in the forum! &nbsp . I've been using 'levels' quite a bit recently trying to enhance some shots I may have taken in relatively tough light. In time with practice & gettin' used to the new camera in different settings, hope to share some good material here!

Regards
 


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2945 posts, RR: 2
Reply 32, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 31):
How does this one look to you?

It's pretty good but maybe not quite as sharp as it could be. Was the originally a tiny bit blurry? The scenery looks familar, is that on approach to Castries?

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 31):
hope to share some good material here!

I can safely say you've been doing that for some time!

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 33, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2240 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 32):
The scenery looks familar, is that on approach to Castries?

It Is.

A shot I've been able to finally get as I'm on vacation, a short walk from my home in St. Lucia. BWA recently started sending their new ATR (3 in all to date) on a new service from Piarco (TTPP).

The original image itself seemed sharp to me. Went over it a couple times with USM layers at .2 x 20%, then again at .1 x 20% which may have softened it a bit too much. Not sure what chances it stands to get in as is..   

Regards,
 


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2945 posts, RR: 2
Reply 34, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2233 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 33):
It Is.

Brings back happy memories although there was very little traffic the last time I was there.

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 33):
Not sure what chances it stands to get in as is..

I wouldn't have though much as it is. I normally use more agressive sharpening setting than that. I'd normally use 300-500, 0.2, 0 (PSE7, USM). It's not far off, but just seems a little soft on my screen.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 35, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2189 times:

Opinions on this photograph?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....3647uvf_02sep2012_1542_edited.jpg

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 36, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2184 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 35):
Opinions on this photograph?

I would drop the contrast a bit, so the background doesn't look quite as dark.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 37, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2183 times:

Thanks very much Dana.

Helped a bit?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...0156uvf_02sep2012_1542_edited2.jpg

 


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 38, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1965 times:

How are these guys?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....6127uvf_02sep2012_1549_edited.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....2223pos_17sep2012_1322_edited.jpg

Regards,
 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 39, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1962 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 38):
How are these guys?

Poor light, especially the first. Likely a dark rejection.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 40, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1960 times:

Thanks Dana!

 


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 41, posted (2 years 5 months 1 hour ago) and read 1800 times:

Any visible issues with this photo?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....3342anu_18sep2012_1510_edited.jpg

Thanks!
G   


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 42, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1793 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 41):
Any visible issues with this photo?

Maybe slight issues with noise & sharpening (a little too much of both), but pretty close as-is.


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 43, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1788 times:

Thanks Dana, I've done some work to adjust those ares & notice a huge improvement (which is always great!) 

Would like to know what your opinions are on this one shot in very little light (sun below the horizon). Particularly, is the sky too noisy, sharpness etc.?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....9421atl_27may2012_1837_edited.jpg

Best regards.

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 44, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1771 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 43):
Would like to know what your opinions are on this one shot

A bit noisy and soft, maybe blurry.


User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 10136 posts, RR: 15
Reply 45, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1744 times:

Nice photos Giann0. A bit off topic but KLM is phasing out their MD11 so should you want to photograph it, you can do that in CUR on mondays when the second KLM flights leaves just after the LIAT flight arrives. Those KLM MD11's will be gone soon!!! Plan a flight to CUR  

A388


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 46, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1624 times:

Thanks buddy! I will try get down there on my next off days!

 


User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 10136 posts, RR: 15
Reply 47, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1587 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 46):
Thanks buddy! I will try get down there on my next off days!

G

You're welcome my friend but hurry up. You now have only two chances to photograph these rare MD11's (which is on mondays).

A388


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 48, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1446 times:

Does this photo have a red / magenta cast? Any other visible issues?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....7873stt_03jan2012_1402_edited.jpg

Best regards,

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 49, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1436 times:

Slight red cast, yes, but probably should be fine.

User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 50, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1253 times:

Hey folks,

I'd like your views / opinions on the below images:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...5604bgi_22oct2012_1642_edited2.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....4256anu_20nov2011_1611_edited.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....3747anu_04nov2012_1624_edited.jpg

Tried my hardest to crop the last one whilst maintaining the sign. Hope the screeners don't see it too off center or high.

Best regards,

 


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 51, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1254 times:

First is verging on being backlit, second is soft/blurry, third is a little high but should be passable.

User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 52, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1254 times:

Thanks Dana,

Ran a edit on this one shot after sunset. How are it's chances?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....8186bgi_13nov2012_1718_edited.jpg

 


User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 10136 posts, RR: 15
Reply 53, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1251 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 52):
Ran a edit on this one shot after sunset. How are it's chances?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b....8186bgi_13nov2012_1718_edited.jpg

G

I think it is too dark. This is a time of the day where photography isn't preferable unless there is actually a sunset to be seen in the photo. Otherwise I think it will be rejected for being dark.

A388


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 54, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1249 times:

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 52):
Ran a edit on this one shot after sunset. How are it's chances?

Image has been removed.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Pre-Screening (Gianni Deligny)
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format