Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Post-Screening: Overexposed King Air?  
User currently offlinecombatshadow From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 149 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 863 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thoughts please? I don't believe this is overexposed, because I took several shots at different shutter speeds, and this is the best one, in my opinion. Maybe I'm not seeing it.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...6915.7639n77hd_nose_klit_1200p.jpg


Bob
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 862 times:

Quoting combatshadow (Thread starter):
Thoughts please?

Yes, it is too bright.


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 839 times:

Quoting combatshadow (Thread starter):
I don't believe this is overexposed

Technically, it's not overexposed. The rejection title is misleading here. It's just too bright for what this site requires. Did you get a centre rejection as well? It looks too high in the frame to me.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10335 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 817 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 2):
Technically, it's not overexposed. The rejection title is misleading here. It's just too bright for what this site requires. Did you get a centre rejection as well? It looks too high in the frame to me.

I opened the shot in Photoshop last night, and there's a large area that is technically overexposed (assuming your definition of "technical overexposure" is 255,255,255).

I agree, the shot doesn't look technically overexposed, and I was a bit surprised to see such a large area actually maxed out.



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlinecombatshadow From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks ago) and read 785 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks guys, I appreciate your time to look and give me some feedback.

didn't get any mention of center, just "overexposed"

I'll try submitting another with the next shutter speed.



Bob
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Post-Screening: Overexposed King Air?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format