Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre-Screening QF88  
User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1107 times:

Here my picturehttp://farm9.staticflickr.com/8469/8115760973_0084b90065_b.jpg
Go ahead critique

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinearndt262 From Germany, joined Mar 2010, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1102 times:

It has a light yellow cast. Easy to fix...

Arndt


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2888 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1100 times:

Quoting arndt262 (Reply 1):
It has a light yellow cast. Easy to fix...

I would also add there's noticable noise, it's a little blurry and oversharp to compensate.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1093 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8047/8115877085_65ac580846_b.jpg Well I tried reducing the yellow cast by reducing saturation and vibrance. If I was to re-edit instead of 85%, 0.2, 0 I should use 70%, 0.2, 0

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1079 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting QF88 (Reply 3):

Still a bit noisy & oversharpened.


User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1062 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8047/8116909553_f2abedc8f6_b.jpg
I tried to reduce the noise and eliminate oversharpness by reducing to 70% 0.2 0


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2888 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1055 times:

QF88,

It looks better on my screen now.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1017 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8472/8121716221_98f5034b8a_b.jpg
So what do you guys think of this picture?

Thanks for your opinions


User currently offlinehenkita217 From Australia, joined Apr 2007, 386 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1013 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi QF88,

Nice photo indeed but due to the interference/obstruction of the fence at the bottom of aircraft, I think it would be rejected for motive.

Also, not sure how to put it, but the colors looks off. Did you use shadow/highlight tool? Over saturated, probably?

Regards,
HB

[Edited 2012-10-25 04:13:55]

User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2888 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1009 times:

Quoting QF88 (Reply 7):
So what do you guys think of this picture?

It'll get motive due to the fence blocking part of the rear fuselage. Do you have a shot taken a second later to avoid the fence?

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1005 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8185/8121795740_75135f3dc8_b.jpg
Here is one I took around one second latter.


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 996 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting QF88 (Reply 10):
Here is one I took around one second latter.

A little yellow, but otherwise should be ok.


User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 972 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8187/8124669512_2f3e11d8f4_b.jpg
I tried to compensate for the yellow by adding a bit of blue colour balance


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 961 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting QF88 (Reply 12):
I tried to compensate for the yellow by adding a bit of blue colour balance

A bit flat, but color looks ok.


User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 897 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8064/8192138069_8879fdc6c0_b.jpg

Your opinions is welcomed. And my SIA 777 got rejected for being soft. Is that right because first it was too sharp now its too soft?


User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 897 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8203/8192198317_19b630e4af_b.jpg

Here the 777-300ER SIA. I fixed the green cast issue but i'm not sure if I should do Additional sharpening.


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 16, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 897 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting QF88 (Reply 14):
Your opinions is welcomed.

Flat, dark, and noisy.

Quoting QF88 (Reply 15):
Here the 777-300ER SIA.

Looks oversharpened, and there is an obvious dust spot that was missed top of frame.

Quoting QF88 (Reply 14):
And my SIA 777 got rejected for being soft. Is that right because first it was too sharp now its too soft?

Looking at it in the rejection log, it seems like you never posted that one for feedback. Yes it is too soft.


User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 897 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8062/8201868505_ed8c3d3ec0_b.jpg I've played around with the colour to make look less dull and compressed so if this one gets the tick it will be submitted

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 18, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 897 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting QF88 (Reply 17):
played around with the colour to make look less dull and compressed so if this one gets the tick it will be submitted

Contrast better, but looks a bit noisier.


User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 897 times:

I didn't do any additional sharpening so I don't see how it can be noisier. Maybe when photoshop compressed it it made it more noisy. I really can't figure out why it more noisier

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 20, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 897 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting QF88 (Reply 19):
so I don't see how it can be noisier.

Adding contrast can easily introduce more noise.


User currently offlineQF88 From Australia, joined Feb 2011, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 873 times:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8343/8213742250_625f55d065_b.jpg

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Pre-Screening QF88
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format