dazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2580 posts, RR: 2 Reply 1, posted (7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 693 times:
Epten,
It looks soft in places, oversharp in others, but mainly soft on my screen. How sharp was the original? There's some chromatic aberration as well. Be careful with the noise. I wouldn't say there's too much, but it's borderline for here.
Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7247 posts, RR: 32 Reply 3, posted (7 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
The aberration Darren points out is a pretty good indication that your lens wasn't quite up to the task, either you were shooting at the extreme end of its range, or it was relatively wide open, which would account for the noticeable softness/blur. If that's not the case, the overall quality of the lens might just not be up to par.
dazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2580 posts, RR: 2 Reply 7, posted (7 months 22 hours ago) and read 584 times:
Quoting Epten (Reply 6): Low in frame and oversharpened?
Are you asking if they are correct rejection reasons or for pre-screening? The aircraft isn't low in the frame for me, it's correctly centred and doesn't look oversharp on my screen.
Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
dazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2580 posts, RR: 2 Reply 16, posted (6 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 462 times:
Quoting frado (Reply 15): Could one please help me here?
Great shot, I love the angle but it's oversharpened. How sharp was the original? Motion blur can be difficult to avoid at that angle if your shutter speed isn't pretty fast so I suspect there's a little blurriness in the original and you've have to apply a lot of sharpening?
Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX