Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre-screening: Oversharpened?  
User currently offlineEpten From Macedonia, joined Sep 2007, 192 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 981 times:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/r1351021402.0143ur-gax1.jpg

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2954 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 974 times:

Epten,

It looks soft in places, oversharp in others, but mainly soft on my screen. How sharp was the original? There's some chromatic aberration as well. Be careful with the noise. I wouldn't say there's too much, but it's borderline for here.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 11098 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 957 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 1):
It looks soft in places, oversharp in others

Same here, which usually leads me to believe it may have been a bit blurry.



I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 930 times:

The aberration Darren points out is a pretty good indication that your lens wasn't quite up to the task, either you were shooting at the extreme end of its range, or it was relatively wide open, which would account for the noticeable softness/blur. If that's not the case, the overall quality of the lens might just not be up to par.

User currently offlineEpten From Macedonia, joined Sep 2007, 192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 895 times:

Yes, it was shot at maximum zoom and maximum aperture.

How about this one:



User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 887 times:

Quoting Epten (Reply 4):
How about this one:

This image is below the minimum size, so can't say anything about quality.


User currently offlineEpten From Macedonia, joined Sep 2007, 192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 873 times:

Low in frame and oversharpened?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/i1351183831.4074hbijb.jpg

[Edited 2012-10-25 09:55:30]

User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2954 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 865 times:

Quoting Epten (Reply 6):
Low in frame and oversharpened?

Are you asking if they are correct rejection reasons or for pre-screening? The aircraft isn't low in the frame for me, it's correctly centred and doesn't look oversharp on my screen.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineepten From Macedonia, joined Sep 2007, 192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 864 times:

I am asking for pre-screening, about things I am not sure about, like center and sharpen in the last example.

Thank you for your feedback!


User currently offlineepten From Macedonia, joined Sep 2007, 192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 845 times:

Yet another: is it oversharpened and low in frame. Any other issues?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/f1351260523.2669tc-fbr.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 10, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 837 times:

Quoting epten (Reply 9):
is it oversharpened and low in frame. Any other issues?

Maybe a touch low, but the bigger problem is the tail is blurry.


User currently offlineepten From Macedonia, joined Sep 2007, 192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 831 times:

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 10):

Maybe a touch low, but the bigger problem is the tail is blurry.

Thank you for your response! Do you mean the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer?


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 12, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 806 times:

Quoting epten (Reply 11):
Do you mean the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer?

No, the whole tail is either blurry, or very, very soft.


User currently offlineepten From Macedonia, joined Sep 2007, 192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 743 times:

Any hope for this one?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/t1351969593.7703ef2000.jpg


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 743 times:

Quoting epten (Reply 13):
Any hope for this one?

Not too bad, just slightly oversharpened/noisy. I don't see why you wouldn't be able to fix it up.


User currently offlinefrado From Germany, joined Jan 2005, 1 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 743 times:

Could one please help me here?

http://smtp.airliners.net/addphotos/...106_l1351468217.97350495_4934b.jpg


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2954 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (2 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 743 times:

Quoting frado (Reply 15):
Could one please help me here?

Great shot, I love the angle but it's oversharpened. How sharp was the original? Motion blur can be difficult to avoid at that angle if your shutter speed isn't pretty fast so I suspect there's a little blurriness in the original and you've have to apply a lot of sharpening?

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 17, posted (2 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 743 times:

Quoting frado (Reply 15):
Could one please help me here?

You should probably start your own thread.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Pre-screening: Oversharpened?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format