Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thoughts On These 2 Shots?  
User currently offlineSGAviation From Singapore, joined Dec 2006, 54 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 1 month 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 873 times:

Hello. Would like some feedback on these two shots currently in the queue.

http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb429/747-412/IMG_1804Edited.jpg

http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb429/747-412/IMG_1690Edited.jpg


"Boeing FTW!"
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 866 times:

Quoting SGAviation (Thread starter):
Would like some feedback on these two shots currently in the queue.

The AB A320 might be too bright for here and get an overexposed rejection. It's a touch soft on the titles as well. The LH A321 is a touch soft on my screen but looks good other than that.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 847 times:

Sharpness should be ok, but both are a little flat.

User currently offlineSGAviation From Singapore, joined Dec 2006, 54 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 766 times:

Both images were rejected.  

For the Air Berlin A320, the comment was:

"too bright"

I lightened it slightly and re-uploaded it into the queue.

The Lufthansa A321, the comment was:

"Weak contrast. Portions of the AC are soft."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have another image that I need feedback on:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/811/img1557edit.jpg/

P.S Should this be put under "Airport Overview"?

Thanks.



"Boeing FTW!"
User currently onlineairkas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 4028 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 762 times:

When you get an overexposed rejection ("too bright"), it's generally not a good idea to make it lighter.

For the airport overview, I can almost guarantee that it will be rejected for motive. It has no airplane to draw your eyes too, and it seems like you wanted to show an air bridge with a couple of planes in the background. It would work if there is an aircraft attached to the air bridge and you showed that aswell (search the database for examples, AMS comes to mind for these kind of shots)


User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 762 times:

Quoting SGAviation (Reply 3):
Both images were rejected

Did you not pull them from the queue and take in to account the comments above? If not, rejections shouldn't have come as a surprise.

Quoting SGAviation (Reply 3):
I lightened it slightly and re-uploaded it into the queue.

That's the oposite of what is needed. The Air Berlin is bordering overexposed, ie is too bright. It needs the exposure reducing, not increasing.

Quoting SGAviation (Reply 3):
P.S Should this be put under "Airport Overview"?

It needs to be uploaded using the registration of the nearest aircraft and isn't an airport overview in my view. It'll probably get rejected for motive though.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 758 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 5):
Did you not pull them from the queue and take in to account the comments above?

Have to agree; what's the point in asking for advice when you're simply going to ignore it? Not sure about Darren, but I tend to stop giving advice if people don't listen to it.


User currently offlineSGAviation From Singapore, joined Dec 2006, 54 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 755 times:

I'm sorry I didn't make this clear. I did take out the Air Berlin A320 and changed the lightness, but not the Lufthansa A321 since that picture generally seemed okay, based on the comments.

But even after the change, they both were rejected. I suppose I didn't "make it less bright enough".

I really do appreciate all the advice and do not ignore them.  

[Edited 2012-11-03 03:00:54]


"Boeing FTW!"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Thoughts On These 2 Shots?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format