I know that I often push this to the limit, without exaggeration (IMHO) and hence sometimes bump into double rejections, as in this case. I assume it was rejected double with this one in mind:
Although it was shot on the same day, I thought it was different enough not to warrant a double rejection, since:
* the aircraft is in a different configuration (one with wings swept forward, the other with wings swept fully aft)
* one shot shows the aircraft making a roll, the other shot is a formation fly-past
* one shot shows more the right side of the aircraft, the other the left side of the aircraft (although I admit they both show more of the bottom-side, but top-side and bottom-side were never used to avoid double rejections).
alevik From Canada, joined Mar 2009, 806 posts, RR: 8 Reply 1, posted (6 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 375 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Walter -
The rules are very clear that those shots would be considered double. The reasons you give do not clarify that there is a clearly different motive. Same side, same day, same aircraft.
walter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1272 posts, RR: 31 Reply 2, posted (6 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 369 times:
Hi Peter,
Actually, the rejected shot shows the left side (indeed seen from below), whereas the other shot shows the right side (also seen from below).
PS: I 've had shots accepted (in the past), where the only difference was "canopy open vs canopy closed" or "gear down vs gear up". So I thought that the wing configuration was a different enough motive (together with the other side), but I guess that I 'll have to accept that screeners see it differently
Sponsor Message: 
From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1272 posts, 
From Canada, joined Mar 2009, 806 posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
