Ok, it did say noisy sky too (is it that bad..?) but I'm still confused about this whole compression rejection thing... Surely the grainy sky isn't an attribute to compression? And if there is compression, can someone point out where?
dazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2603 posts, RR: 2 Reply 1, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 396 times:
Quoting NZ107 (Thread starter): Surely the grainy sky isn't an attribute to compression? And if there is compression, can someone point out where?
I think the noisy sky is a little harsh, it's just about visible if you look for it but you know what this site is like where noise is concerned. There are several recent additions to the database where noise is more apparent than on yours. As for compression, if that was your only rejection reason it would be an appeal for me as i'm struggling to find any compression artifacts.
Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
NZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 5702 posts, RR: 39 Reply 2, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 395 times:
Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 1): As for compression, if that was your only rejection reason it would be an appeal for me as i'm struggling to find any compression artifacts.
How much does a 'personal' count towards being a reason per se? Because taking out the personal leaves it with just the compression rejection; which I think I'll appeal shortly..
Sponsor Message: 
From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 5702 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2603 posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
