"vignetting Visible" — Photography Feedback Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

"vignetting Visible"

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 723 times:

Hello

I uploaded my first picture to Airliners.net but unfortunately it was rejected and i got this comment regarding my picture :

A comment from the screener regarding this upload:
"vignetting visible"

Could anyone tell me what does this exactly mean ?

this is my picture i need your opinion about it :

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...in?filename=d1350829492.076499.jpg

and,, if it will be accepted after some editing ? or i have to capture completely different one ?

Thnx.

17 replies: All unread, jump to last

dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 720 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Hello, and welcome.

Quoting maodeh (Thread starter):
if it will be accepted after some editing ?

I'll asume vignetting wasn't the only rejection reason? I see issues with softness, color, size, and centering as well. That having been said, it's not too bad for your first attempt, though I don't know if you will be able to edit it to standards for here. Assuming you can fix the issues I have just mentioned, the image will still be backlit, which in general, doesn't work too well for here. In any case, you can try giving this one a re-edit addressing the problems mentioned above, and we'll how that turns out.

Dana

JKPhotos From Germany, joined Nov 2011, 110 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 704 times:

Hi,

Take a look at the sky, it is darker on the sides and especially in the corners. This is called "Vignetting".

Wiki: "In photography and optics, vignetting ( /vɪnˈjɛtɪŋ/; French: "vignette") is a reduction of an image's brightness or saturation at the periphery compared to the image center. "

You could try to solve this problem by using a Lens Correction filter for example in Photoshop.

But you should trust Dana's words, there seem to be other obstacles to get it accepted.

Anyway good luck and don't give up.

Perhaps take a look at airliners editing guide, it might help:
http://www.airliners.net/faq/editing_guide.php?

jay

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 672 times:

Thanks Dana and Jay for your help and advice

here is the picture after editing :

http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee504/maodeh/Untitled6.jpg

i'm not good at editing picture let me be honest

so how is it now ?

Thnx .

Mahmoud .

dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31
Reply 4, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 672 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting maodeh (Reply 3):
so how is it now ?

Framing & size are ok now, but still quite soft. How sharp is the original?

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 668 times:

here is the original picture :

http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee504/maodeh/049.jpg

when i try to sharp it , it affects the color . i don't know

maybe i should ask an expert

dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31
Reply 6, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 666 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting maodeh (Reply 5):
here is the original picture :

If the original image is only 1023 pixels across, there is probably not much that you will be able to do. You should keep in mind that while very versatile cameras, super-zooms like your SX40 make great compromises in terms of quality to fit such a massive focal range into a single camera/lens combination. You shouldn't expect results to be too good in anything but the best light, and at relatively close range. Anything outside of those conditions, and you'll start to see quality issues, like with the image above.

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 664 times:

it's actually 4000 pixels across , i think the uploading website is minimizing the image size

i captured this pic by the SX40

and i can see that you are completely right about what you said MR.Dana

so anything to do more or i have to captre another picture

Thanks a lot .

dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31
Reply 8, posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 655 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting maodeh (Reply 7):
so anything to do more or i have to captre another picture

Like I said, I would need to see the original before making any final conclusions, but I wouldn't get your hopes up for this one.

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 645 times:

i re-uploaded the picture , it's 4000*2248 Pixels

http://www.m5zn.com/img/?img=d3a1f777e6d696d.jpg

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 8):
but I wouldn't get your hopes up for this one.

no problem , i really appreciate your help and advice and this is enough for me .

dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31
Reply 10, posted (7 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 634 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting maodeh (Reply 9):
re-uploaded the picture , it's 4000*2248 Pixels

That's quite soft, almost to the point of being blurry, so I don't think there is much you can do with this one. Sorry.

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (7 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 625 times:

aha , no problem

what about this one :

http://www.m5zn.com/img/?img=7c79414394d8d1b.jpg

many thanks .

dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31
Reply 12, posted (7 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 604 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting maodeh (Reply 11):
what about this one :

Also quite soft and noisy, and the fact that you would need to crop a significant part of the frame means the quality issues would be quite obvious.

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 582 times:

Thank you MR.Dana i will try to catch better pictures

Thanks a lot

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 557 times:

I didn't find any airplanes to catch

After trying to sharp the photo here is the result :

http://www.m5zn.com/img/?img=8c71cf04e0f1395.jpg

this is the best thing i've got , bad eh ?

dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31
Reply 15, posted (7 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 557 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting maodeh (Reply 14):
this is the best thing i've got

Unfortunately would still be rejected for multiple reasons.

maodeh From Jordan, joined Jul 2012, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 557 times:

the multiple reasons is what i want to know

Thanks dana

here is the 3rd atempt
http://www.airplane-pictures.net/ima...es/forum/attached/2012/11/376m.jpg

dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7318 posts, RR: 31
Reply 17, posted (7 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 557 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting maodeh (Reply 16):
here is the 3rd atempt

Not much better. I don't think this one is going to be possible, so better to start anew with a different image.

Top Of Page

Forum Index

Sponsor Message:

Printer friendly format