Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Post-screening (Centered)  
User currently onlinewalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1272 posts, RR: 31
Posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 455 times:

Hi All,

Looking for some advise on better centering for this rejection:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ebfs_20120624_img_36440_wvb_nr.jpg

I never measure shots for centering, I just look at it for balance and then that's it. Now, that I have got a centering rejection (I normally get rejections for soft and dark, for which I know more or less to improve on it or to forget about it), I would like some advise here. Since my first "looks good" was not good, I would like some advise on "how much" should I change?

Thanks and regards,

Walter


canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2570 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 448 times:

Walter,

It looks pretty good to me as it is, but it may benefit from being a little higher in the frame. I guess that's where the rejection came from.

Darren


Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7236 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 439 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Looks a little low, and checking the log, there was a personal message included with the rejection indicating such.

User currently onlinewalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1272 posts, RR: 31
Reply 3, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 437 times:

Hi Darren, Dana,

Indeed, there was a message that it was a little low in the frame. But what is meant with "a little". As I explained, I always center it based on "balance look" (to me), and since it was stated to to put it "a little" higher, I am seeking some advice to just quantify it a bit better. Just trying to avoid another rejection...

Thanks and regards,

Walter


canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2570 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 433 times:

Quoting walter2222 (Reply 3):
But what is meant with "a little".

It's difficult to say how much to raise it in the frame as it's how it looks, but I'd say try reducing the dead space at the top of the frame by about a 1/3 and see how that looks.

Darren


Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently onlinewalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1272 posts, RR: 31
Reply 5, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 417 times:

Thanks, Darren!

I will give it a try tomorrow.

Best regards,

Walter


canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Post-screening (Centered)
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format