powwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 250 posts, RR: 0 Posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3291 times:
opening a new thread for my uploads, the old one has been locked.
Please comment on these two new uploads, which one to keep? probably can not have both because of the double rule.
These are the first 787 flight arriving at ORD, I like the second one better because the angle probably will be a bit different with others and the 320 adds some interest too. but the light was not as good, so I hope it can make it, what do you think? Thanks!
NZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6081 posts, RR: 40 Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3291 times:
UA 738 - more of a cast here than on the others, that's for sure; if that helps, I'm not too sure.. It only really exists towards the nose.
I see no cyan on the BR MD11.
I hardly see a cyan cast on the A320.. If there was one, it's extremely faint. I'd probably add a wee bit more contrast to this one if you were going to edit it further..
powwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 250 posts, RR: 0 Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3291 times:
Thanks NZ107, and thank Dana for the edition, now I can see the color tint.
Now, these two new rejections are for grainy and soft, I have taken many pictures with similar light condition, ISO was still 200 I believe, same work flow as many accepted pictures, never had a grainy rejection, soft is different question. so I want to ask for a second opinion to see if you see grainy and soft. thanks!
powwwiii From United States of America, joined May 2011, 250 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3194 times:
I just recently got a new monitor, seems the color and brightness are different with the old one, probably my eyes are already used to the old one. Please help me to calibrate my eyes to the new monitor. Here are three new uploads, please comment on the quaility, especially color, brightness, etc. Thanks!
NZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6081 posts, RR: 40 Reply 21, posted (11 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2894 times:
1. A bit soft, possibly due to the noise reduction and still a little flat.
2. Might be ok but to me, it doesn't really add too much to the picture. Seems a little on the cool side too.
3. It's low in the frame to begin with and the other bits are distracting, especially the overhead light.