JGreg From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 46 posts, RR: 0 Posted (3 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 834 times:
I'd welcome a bit of advice on this one which has been rejected as soft. This is the second time it has been rejected - the first time being for low contrast with no mention of softness, but I can see that it does look a little soft.
What I would like to know from an experienced eye is whether there are particular parts of it which look soft or whether it just needs another pass of USM over all of it. I know that the red diagonal line on the fuselage looks a little soft but I always find that these lines can easily look oversharpened (a big problem on PIA aircraft) - am I right to be cautious with that?
Thanks in advance.
I'd be grateful if someone could point out which bits look oversharp as I'm still not a great judge of sharpening.
I'd also welcome comments on the 'darkness' - its a difficult one to get right because of the angle of the sun - and these aircraft are a strange shade of grey anyway - they always look (to my eyes at least ) a bit darker than most grey military aircraft.
Many thanks in advance.