I can see ever-so-slightly more noise than a regular side-on but:
a) this is from 2005.
b) this was very low, sunset light at ISO400, on a 350D.
c) this features an aircraft and scheme not well represented in the database.
Silver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4536 posts, RR: 26 Reply 4, posted (6 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 474 times:
Quoting JakTrax (Reply 3): Vk, I'm not claiming it's noise-free, but for me it's negligible considering it's an older image of a rare aircraft.
Cheers,
Karl
Makes no difference to Airliners.net.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
1. "Images taken before the digital era (pre 2002 as a rough guideline) will be screened with more leniency..."
2. "Rare aircraft and new registrations will also be screened with more leniency."
Not sure if you are referring to the amount of noise or the rarity, but if the latter that is absolutely not true. Older, rare, and in some cases new registrations have more lax standards applied to them.
Quoting mjgbtv (Reply 5): But is this old and rare enough? I don't know.
2005 and 43 images already on the db, so no, it is not.
Sorry, I'm on my iPhone and mistakenly quoted the wrong reply.
This is what I meant to quote...
Quoting JakTrax (Thread starter): I can see ever-so-slightly more noise than a regular side-on but:
a) this is from 2005.
b) this was very low, sunset light at ISO400, on a 350D.
c) this features an aircraft and scheme not well represented in the database.
It seems a bit picky to me, given the rarity.
2005 isn't old enough.
Sun being low and shot at ISO 400 on an older camera doesn't matter to anet, I'm sure. We'd all like it to, but the when and how doesn't mean much to anet. Final result is what matters.
It's not the first photo of the aircraft in the DB.
Hope that clears it up.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7238 posts, RR: 32 Reply 8, posted (6 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 474 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 7): Sorry, I'm on my iPhone and mistakenly quoted the wrong reply.
Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 7): Sun being low and shot at ISO 400 on an older camera doesn't matter to anet, I'm sure. We'd all like it to, but the when and how doesn't mean much to anet. Final result is what matters.
Ok, that makes a lot more sense , and you're about right with that.
Sponsor Message: 
From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4735 posts, 
From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 5672 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 8215 posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7238 posts, 
, and you're about right with that.
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
